guod
Well-Known Member
NOT "american" enough

Italian designed!..................count me in....................
Italian designed!..................count me in....................
NOT "american" enough![]()
Is their a reason why we don't recommend LG since the release of these?.......was it always just about them pissing us off over the BS par#s and not mostly "white" power ??............I don't remember what went down anymore
Those were the early days when we were trying to wrap our head around PAR spectrums from different light sources and the fact that we were seeing comparable yields despite having a PPFD that was half that of HPS. I felt the backslash for the ill-conceived term, "LumiPAR," so I pulled the concept from our collateral soon after. Yes, it was confusing and the BS radars rippled through the forums; seems the damage was significant. Mea culpa.
I just posted a thread about the photosynthetic rates of HPS vs LG LEDs for Gerbera. As it turns out we weren't too far off from our estimate on effective PPFD for our LED spectrum; a small consolation.
About those LG Pro OSRAM diodes; yes, they're top-bin. Just in the last year, the diodes' efficiencies coming off the line have improved. The Pro 650 and Pro 325 are now running at 615w and 310w respectively; the high-voltage units are even better at 285w and 538w respectively (edit: although this is because of the power supply, not the diodes). Now I have a problem of a product name that doesn't match the wattage pull; another lesson learned.
Can you clarify on how close the yields where?? @ half the ppfd
Is their a way for the growers to know that they're getting the latest/most efficient LG units when purchasing?? model/sku # on the casing??
I would also try to remove " par #'s equal to 2 1000w hps" from your product description ........it's misleading(in terms of yield) to the average consumer IMO
damn close, manThe Pro 325 provides red and blue PAR equivalent to that of a 1000 Watt HID light while it reduces energy consumption by a whopping 70%.
.
About those LG Pro OSRAM diodes; yes, they're top-bin. Just in the last year, the diodes' efficiencies coming off the line have improved.
I've asked a few times for suggestions, and while I would love to follow up with those and order a nice led unit from a reputable company, my funds are all but tied right now.
What i do have, is a $50 amazon credit, and i have been browsing various led bulbs/fixtures that are available on that site.
Can you send me some suggestions on what a good investment would be for $50 with little or no added from my pocket, just for now until I have the resources available again for a nice led unit.
Thank you
Also, if i were to get led bulbs, which spectrum? Should i go specific for vegetation and flower like with cfls, or just go for daylight spectrum?
Can you clarify on how close the yields where?? @ half the ppfd
Yeah I remember how excited we all where when the #s released for the proline, then guod "straightened out" our math
Good to hear about the chips all being top-bin now, Is their a way for the growers to know that their getting the latest/most efficient LG units when purchasing?? model/sku # on the casing??
I would also try to remove " par #'s equal to 2 1000w hps" from your product description ........it's misleading(in terms of yield) to the average consumer IMO
http://growershouse.com/lumigrow-pro-650
good luck
Depends...
View attachment 3298993
Hope all is well Psuagro, did you happen to catch my latest time lapse with the Hated HydroGrow LEDS? lol... I didn't do as well as anticipated. didn't reach my gram per watt that I did with the extreme series..but hey 397 grams aint bad for just two plants.....
sounds like the best option. using a bunch of 3 watt diodes spread over a large area.just need to find a large aluminum sheet to keep them cool. thank youOkay..makes sense now. If it's one of those affordable ebay multichips I would just switch it for a few smaller ones and spread the light out