• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Affordable?

londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Now that Suh had his suspension overturned and Fairly is practicing, I don't have much faith in Murray winning the game. He'll get his yards, he's that good, but he won't be the difference. If the cowboys win it will be because of Romo, not in spite of him. That's why I'm picking the Lions. I have no faith in Romo either.
Click to expand...
WTF is wrong with Matthew this year. His numbers are nothing like his past. Lions defense is nice this year. It's just that o can't put up the points like yesteryear
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I already said I don't view the government as just force. I see good, bad and room for improvement. You only see bad bad government very bad
Click to expand...
Is a coercive means against peaceful people bad?

I bet you won't answer that question either.

Stop looking at one side of the equation and you'll find the answers much easier to derive.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
I've noticed those who say "You have to share" the most are the ones who usually bring nothing to the table.
Click to expand...
It's that kindergarten mentality. Johnny's mom won't let him have gummy bears so no one else can have them either or it wouldn't be fair to Johnny. Johnny has an awesome 128 box of crayons and Billy only has 6 so Johnny has to give part of his away or it's not fair.

Why can't Billy be happy eating gummy bears while being happy for Johnny that he has great crayons? We are taught at an early age about "fairness" and "sharing". Johnny may want to share his crayons with Suzy and not Billy, but it wouldn't be fair. Besides, it's his damn fault we can't have gummy bears, so who cares who shares them with as long as the little gummy natzi doesn't have too many crayons.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
WTF is wrong with Matthew this year. His numbers are nothing like his past. Lions defense is nice this year. It's just that o can't put up the points like yesteryear
Click to expand...
A lot of it is the O-line, a lot is the new system. I refuse to believe Linnehan is an offensive genius but he sure has made a difference in Romo and Staff had a huge drop-off. I look for him to return to pro-bowl form next year.

Our O-coordinator is Vince Lombardi's grandson. He's still learning.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I have no problem sharing. I share and also make sure I put away for my children
Click to expand...
If you have money to "put away", you're not sharing enough. YOU don't get to decide how much you share. "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs, as decided by the ruling party.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
It's that kindergarten mentality. Johnny's mom won't let him have gummy bears so no one else can have them either or it wouldn't be fair to Johnny. Johnny has an awesome 128 box of crayons and Billy only has 6 so Johnny has to give part of his away or it's not fair.

Why can't Billy be happy eating gummy bears while being happy for Johnny that he has great crayons? We are taught at an early age about "fairness" and "sharing". Johnny may want to share his crayons with Suzy and not Billy, but it wouldn't be fair. Besides, it's his damn fault we can't have gummy bears, so who cares who shares them with as long as the little gummy natzi doesn't have too many crayons.
Click to expand...
what kindergarten school did you attend. Kids can choke on gummy bears. Apple slices would be much better
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
If you have money to "put away", you're not sharing enough. YOU don't get to decide how much you share. "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs, as decided by the ruling party.
Click to expand...
now you are about to go off the stupid end again. Try to stay focus.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Wrong again. Barriers to entry are imposed by restricting a persons use of their own property, not by forcing them to use it in ways another person dictates to them.

Did you major in Dumb, before you quit college?
Click to expand...
so barriers to entry and reduced competition are harmful to businesses, but not to black patrons?

because if we follow your model of segregation based on skin color, black people will be barred from entry and given a reduced number of competitors to choose from, which you have stated outright is harmful to businesses.

so are you for harming black people? you think that should be legal?
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
what kindergarten school did you attend. Kids can choke on gummy bears. Apple slices would be much better
Click to expand...
How can you have any pudding if you won't eat your meat?

All right, you just went full commie trying to outlaw gummy bears. That's wear I draw the line ;) You'll have to leave now..

We could have a policy where schools don't supply gummy bears but if parents want their kids to have them we could butt out. Is that view extremist?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top