• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Affordable?

Red1966

Well-Known Member
but if they can and do eat it (making themselves sick; having the healthy pick-up tab) why should they benefit when others don't?

NO EFFECTIVE TAX RATE BELOW 35%? AMIRITE?
You are the one advocating that exact scenario. Have you changed your position? How are you going to pay back that illegal subsidy you got? The IRS doesn't care whether or not you have a job, they'll just come and auction off your car, home, clothing, and any other personal belongings they find. They'll confiscate your Pell grant, too.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You are the one advocating that exact scenario. Have you changed your position? How are you going to pay back that illegal subsidy you got? The IRS doesn't care whether or not you have a job, they'll just come and auction off your car, home, clothing, and any other personal belongings they find. They'll confiscate your Pell grant, too.
and just how would they go about confiscating the Pell?

EDIT: and just what make you think that i received a subsidy erroneously?

<schuylaar refills her coffee, this should be good>
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
but if they can and do eat it (making themselves sick; having the healthy pick-up tab) why should they benefit when others don't?

NO EFFECTIVE TAX RATE BELOW 35%? AMIRITE?
You are going to break a lot of poor people with that tax rate. I hope you realize that some poor pay a negative effective rate meaning they get back more than they pay. You want them to pay 35%?

You mean no effective tax rate below 35% for the rich so you can get more free shit?

Look at the record revenues our country is bringing in now. Our country has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
and just how would they go about confiscating the Pell?

EDIT: and just what make you think that i received a subsidy erroneously?

<schuylaar refills her coffee, this should be good>
The IRS can take anything they want, by force if need be. You were bragging about getting the subsidy. Did you lie?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The IRS can take anything they want, by force if need be. You were bragging about getting the subsidy. Did you lie?
1. bragging?; more like happy that something actually trickles down..you know the trickle down economy you righties used to talk about?

2. fail. the IRS cannot take just anything and/or everything.

have you by any chance able to catch this? if you can't take 12 minutes feel free to start at 5:00:

 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member

Red1966

Well-Known Member
1. bragging?; more like happy that something actually trickles down..you know the trickle down economy you righties used to talk about?

2. fail. the IRS cannot take just anything and/or everything.

have you by any chance able to catch this? if you can't take 12 minutes feel free to start at 5:00:

So now you admit to it? Why try to imply I was incorrect? Could it be that libtards condone lying if it furthers their agenda? Well, no, not anything, but just about anything.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
So now you admit to it? Why try to imply I was incorrect? Could it be that libtards condone lying if it furthers their agenda? Well, no, not anything, but just about anything.
Libtards arent too cheap to buy simple insurance and piece of mind items like smoke detectors.
Will you reunite with your family this year?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You are going to break a lot of poor people with that tax rate. I hope you realize that some poor pay a negative effective rate meaning they get back more than they pay. You want them to pay 35%?

You mean no effective tax rate below 35% for the rich so you can get more free shit?

Look at the record revenues our country is bringing in now. Our country has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

the wealthy hides their money and mr. obama is gunning for it, wait and see.

you guys don't really listen/pay attention to the "winds of washington".

FATCA was only the beginning:wink:

 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
So now you admit to it? Why try to imply I was incorrect? Could it be that libtards condone lying if it furthers their agenda? Well, no, not anything, but just about anything.
is this a meltdown brewing? ohhhhhhhh, buuuuuucky...

<schuylaar tries to shake bucky awake>
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Washington, D.C., November 29, 2012—The average federal tax rate for all taxpayers rose slightly in 2010 to 11.81 percent, up from 11.06 percent the previous year. The tax rate paid by individuals with incomes in the top 1 percent averaged 23.39 percent, while all filers in the bottom 50 percent paid an average tax rate of 2.37 percent, according to a new Tax Foundation analysis.

http://taxfoundation.org/article/what-do-americans-really-pay-income-taxes
yet it doesn't mention what percentage of their wealth they truly pay..those numbers.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
But aren't they the ones you are advocating that others subsidize?
i'm a firm believer of putting it all on the table and this includes all your cash.

if everyone paid their fair share from all their cash we wouldn't be in this situation.

it's because of the broken tax code..its wild west city..but we still have the new sheriff in town. he's gunning for 3 key issues (last 2 years) and tax code is one of them..a republican congress you say? teehee..then EO pen is mightier than the rescumlican sword.

a flat 15% from everyone*..win-win

*% of poverty is excluded from everyone
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Red you said you didn't have a smoke alarm, you claimed they had not been invented yet.
I couldn't remember if I had a smoke alarm or not. It was 35 years ago. I don't even recall if they were even available. I never said I didn't have one. You did. Repeatedly. With no evidence at all. So, basically, you were lying. Just for your desperation to demonize me because you can't refute me. Sucks to be you.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I couldn't remember if I had a smoke alarm or not. It was 35 years ago. I don't even recall if they were even available. I never said I didn't have one. You did. Repeatedly. With no evidence at all. So, basically, you were lying. Just for your desperation to demonize me because you can't refute me. Sucks to be you.
he did show evidence and posted.

they were invented in 1965 and available to the public for purchase.
 
Top