UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the decreased buying power of the dollar.
do you ever get even a single fact right?
the decreased buying power of the dollar.
Monitoring software? Explain please.ISP's compete with one another. If one raises it's rates then you can go to another one. The competition is what keeps costs down despite inflation and the decreased buying power of the dollar.
You dont see how it will slow things down because of monitoring software?
You dont see how it will be more expensive with the extra reporting requirements?
You dont understand that taxpayers will have to fund a new bureacracy entitled to decide who is being treated fairly/unfairly regarding the internet? Someone probably the age of your grandpa and more worried about votes than bytes right?
You dont see how it will be more expensive and slower for everyone in the name of fairness??
Monitoring software? Explain please.
Personally if I was the NSA I would use a mirror to collect the data it is easier and much more simple. You use a mirror box to duplicate the fiber optic signal, no loss of quality.
Then Netflix has a right to switch ISP's or become an ISP itself...
So Netflix should just ignore comcast customers and only be available to AT&T uverse and time warner huh?
Just switch ISPs...
So dumb.
You are the product. You are not the consumer. Only net neutrality solves this problem.
It would simply leave its infrastructure that way it currently is.How would the ISP prove that it was being *neutral* ?
Do they even grow, bro?why have these idiots chosen our forum to sully?
there are so many other forums where their nonsense would be welcomed.
It would simply leave its infrastructure that way it currently is.
To make the Internet 'not neutral' would actually take a little bit of work from the ISPSs, they will need to do a fuckload of coding and lease a shitload more servers.
No need to employ hundreds, just have someone from the FCC respond to complaints when companies come in and tell them that they are being extorted by an ISP and are breaking regulations. Easy.
Nice straw man.So you want a government body to tell yet another industry what they can and cannot do with their own private products and services?
You guys never end... But hey, it is bad to make weed illegal... Yeah right... People are delusional.
So you want a government body to tell yet another industry what they can and cannot do with their own private products and services?
Comcast doesn't own the internet.
Comcast doesn't own the internet.
Forgive me, I has the Dumb (great catch phrase), If Comcast put the cables on the pole, wouldn`t they own it ? and...Why do people care how fast the internet is ? I know I don`t.
Comcast doesn't own the internet.
A few cables and poles in a few towns is not the internet. However, yes, that infrastructure should be public like roads and parks.Comcast doesnt spend money on infrastructure? Is that suddenly public property when it touches the internet?
Do you live in an underground bunker somewhere and comcast is the only provider?
A few cables and poles in a few towns is not the internet. However, yes, that infrastructure should be public like roads and parks.
Please explain to me how an OC3 backbone works bro. I was sixteen when I got my first A+ certification, 18 when I landed my first Cisco CCNA. Want to discuss the finer details of networking security in work forces larger then one thousand workstations?They are introducing gigabit internet.
This issue is a strawman created by people who's interest it is in to shut down the little guy and these people who are arguing for it are too stupid to see that.
In addition, it appears that many of the people arguing simply do not understand the structure of the internet.
Please explain to me how an OC3 backbone works bro. I was sixteen when I got my first A+ certification, 18 when I landed my first Cisco CCNA. Want to discuss the finer details of networking security in work forces larger then one thousand workstations?