Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
That's not a bad question, except you made a few erroneous assumptions.
When you answer some of my questions, I'll answer this one for you.
Two eyes for an eye
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
When you answer some of my questions, I'll answer this one for you.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
How do you know I didn't make this spear?
Oh you mean property like land? Okay, a person a thousand years ago comes across unowned unused land and decides to build a hut there, he then starts an agricultural endeavor. His ancestors remain there for 2 hundred years, making improvements and farming that land. Do they own the land? I say yes.
If you advocate for forced interactions when one party would rather not interact, you are ultimately approving of the use of a gun to enforce your will. The fact you employ a substitute thug might just mean you are too fearful or lazy to do your own dirty work.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Okay. Let's examine your assertions.
You are saying that a person that will not force another person to interact with somebody on their own property is a racist, is that correct?
You are also saying you find it acceptable to force people to interact against their will, is that correct?
You are also claiming that I eat cheetohs...oh forget that one...but I do have an awesome beard dammit!!
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Not private.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I'm saying you're a racist because you spam this pro racial discrimination shit daily.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
A hundred years later, a terrible plague caused by shitting on the floor wipes out everybody but one industrious fellow. He continues to farm the land and use it. Does he own the land?
Also, you apparently are afraid to answer MY questions.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
There is no need for hypothetical bullshit examples when really existing ones don't jive with your bullshit views.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No I do not. I spam leaving people alone that are remaining on their own property.
While I don't always approve of what people might do or not do with their property, I respect that I do not own them, neither do you or anybody else. Your viewpoint allows things like prohibition to exist, where one party can make another party do things or not do things with their own property or body. Logic insists that is so, you run from that assertion I just made and dig into your deck of Uncle Buck race cards, which is kind of funny, but also absurd.
You also are afraid to answer most of my questions. That makes me think you can't answer them.
What is property and who can own it?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Is that another way of deflecting? Why yes it is.
You are afraid to answer MY questions. Good night.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Abandon Conflict is afraid to address these points and has a neck beard.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Thanks to government, yes, he does. Now he moans about paying property tax and thinks that he should have the right to discriminate based solely on race.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
It is a way of telling you to embrace reality.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
The dictionary has one.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Snitch says what?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
You better check if he has a definition for snitch before having a conversation with him about it...
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
He says he "outed" me and "blew my cover", yet he can't admit to being a snitch.
His dictionary is broken.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
He says he "outed" me and "blew my cover", yet he can't admit to being a snitch.
His dictionary is broken.
Apparently he lives on the charity of disability so there are more things than that broken with him...
I sorta get a William Shattner 50# overweight vibe from him...
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Check out his posting history. He's on here most of the day, every day. He takes a break for about 6 - 8 hours, once a day. He claims to be traveling the world, yet never leaves his hotel room. One day he's in one country, the next day he's 4000 miles in the other direction. I bet if you ask he him wouldn't be able to produce a simple picture of a recent plane ticket stub with his name crossed out. The dude's a fraud as far as I can tell.
For the record, I find nothing wrong with collecting disability. It's there to be used. He sure does go out of the way to flaunt it though. I don't know if he's insecure, proud, or immature. OK, you collect disability. And then ... ?