i've flung poo..dog poo..over my hedge and into a nasty neighbors pristine yard.Welp, the bull in the China shop awakens from another drunken slumber, time for things to come to a screeching halt again.
i've flung poo..dog poo..over my hedge and into a nasty neighbors pristine yard.Welp, the bull in the China shop awakens from another drunken slumber, time for things to come to a screeching halt again.
It might only confuse the high school drop outs, FOX news watchers, and people who are basically basic.I started watching a show called house of cards and the democratic president's last name is "WALKER" so how ironic would it be to have a real republican president named "WALKER". It might confuse the Dems when they vote, if they vote.
We will have to wait and see. Twenty more months until we vote again is just around the corner. And the KING of VETO's will more than likely set a new veto record to run on for the dems . The party of veto should be a real winner for voters. good luck with that.It might only confuse the high school drop outs, FOX news watchers, and people who are basically basic.
I suggest you don't let the "House of Cards" confused that limited mind of yours.We will have to wait and see. Twenty more months until we vote again is just around the corner. And the KING of VETO's will more than likely set a new veto record to run on for the dems . The party of veto should be a real winner for voters. good luck with that.
Actually it is a very informative TV show how politics can be played on both sides. Except sooner or later the other team gets the ball and the new play book. So I can wait, because the new democratic play book is pretty bad ass. And I am looking forward to seeing it being used by the other side when the time comes. fucking A.I suggest you don't let the "House of Cards" confused that limited mind of yours.
WOW so you get informed from a make believe TV show and think others will get confused. I think the only one confused here is you my limited minded friend.Actually it is a very informative TV show how politics can be played on both sides. Except sooner or later the other team gets the ball and the new play book. So I can wait, because the new democratic play book is pretty bad ass. And I am looking forward to seeing it being used by the other side when the time comes. fucking A.
You only have to look like a rapist to be banned from interacting with other people in Oregon.http://jezebel.com/scott-walker-wants-colleges-to-stop-reporting-sexual-as-1688375293
Scott Walker Wants Colleges to Stop Reporting Sexual Assaults
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's proposed budget—which would cut $300 million dollars out of the state's beloved public university system—has a non-fiscal bombshell tucked in between its insane pages.
Under Walker's budget, universities would no longer have to report the number of sexual assaults that take place on a campus to the Department of Justice. Under Walker's plan, university employees who witness a sexual assault would no longer have to report it.
There are no policy recommendations in Walker's budget how or what would replace these reporting mechanisms. The Governor simply instructs that they should be deleted.
For those of you who are unfamiliar with the bewildering force that is Scott Walker, know this: he is a small-time guy who is having a big-time moment by playing the conservative werewolf, a role Chris Christie and Jeb Bush are so far unwilling to play in their presidential bids.
As the election cycle drags on you will be able to tick off the boxes on Scott Walker's CONSERVATIVE STRONG MAN card. Count this as the first of many boxes.
Below is the text from the budget proposal to 'delete' the requirements.
25. DELETE LANGUAGE RELATED TO SEXUAL ASSAULT INFORMATION AND REPORTING
Delete the requirement that the Board direct each institution and college campus to incorporate oral and written or electronic information on sexual assault in its orientation program for newly entering students and to supply all students enrolled in the institution or college campus with the same information in either printed or electronic form.
Delete the requirement that the Board of Regents submit an annual report to the Legislature regarding the methods used to comply with the above requirement.
Delete the requirement that any person employed at an institution who witnesses a sexual assault on campus or receives a report from a student enrolled in the institution that the student has been sexually assaulted report the assault to the dean of students. Delete the requirement that each institution report annually to the Department of Justice (DOJ) statistics on sexual assaults and on sexual assaults committed by acquaintances of the victims that occurred on the campus of that institution in the previous years, and that DOJ include those statistics in appropriate crime reports.
Its a budget, not a new law. Its getting rid of discretionary spending, it in no way requires schools to stop reporting assaults. The schools will still report those things, its the law. They just won't have to make a whole bunch of reports to a whole bunch of people that can't do a damn thing about those assaults and rapes.Maybe schools should not report report murders, suicide, arson or vandalism either? Those are all bad for attracting prospective students and businesses as well.
dude did you just quote an article from drudge on a professors CLAIMYou only have to look like a rapist to be banned from interacting with other people in Oregon.
"A Harvard professor claimed in a Harvard Law Review article that a male college student in Oregon was ordered to stay away from another student solely because he resembled a man who raped her."
http://www.drudge.com/news/185870/college-punishes-student-looking-like
sounds like good policy to me, but an insecure little shitling like you probably gets off on intimidating women. all part of your crippling insecurity, probably the same reason why you have to remind us constantly that you were in the mARINES.You only have to look like a rapist to be banned from interacting with other people in Oregon.
"A Harvard professor claimed in a Harvard Law Review article that a male college student in Oregon was ordered to stay away from another student solely because he resembled a man who raped her."
http://www.drudge.com/news/185870/college-punishes-student-looking-like
why are you an insecure rape apologist?Its a budget, not a new law. Its getting rid of discretionary spending, it in no way requires schools to stop reporting assaults. The schools will still report those things, its the law. They just won't have to make a whole bunch of reports to a whole bunch of people that can't do a damn thing about those assaults and rapes.
If a faculty member sees a man assaulting a woman, he will still be required to call the police/authorities, he just doesn't have to type up a 10 page report to hand to the Dean.
capisce?
You seem confused about what a good job is so good luck in 2016.WOW so you get informed from a make believe TV show and think others will get confused. I think the only one confused here is you my limited minded friend.
Yep sure did, can you refute it?dude did you just quote an article from drudge on a professors CLAIM
I recently assisted a young man who was subjected by administrators at his small liberal arts university in Oregon to a month-long investigation into all his campus relationships, seeking information about his possible sexual misconduct in them (an immense invasion of his and his friends’ privacy), and who was ordered to stay away from a fellow student (cutting him off from his housing, his campus job, and educational opportunity) — all because he reminded her of the man who had raped her months before and thousands of miles away.
I'm retired and own my own business, so I'm sure I understand what is a good job that will last and support a family for years.You seem confused about what a good job is so good luck in 2016.
How can I refute things with unknown names. At least provide the professors name or the guy who was told to stay away. He must have a great case for a lawsuit.Yep sure did, can you refute it?
If you would like to see the actual report
http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/02/trading-the-megaphone-for-the-gavel-in-title-ix-enforcement-2/
This is just one more piece of evidence that tells me you never attended any college and barely made it through High School.How can I refute things with unknown names. At least provide the professors name or the guy who was told to stay away. He must have a great case for a lawsuit.
in grade school, they also teach the difference between plural and singular.This is just one more piece of evidence that tells me you never attended any college and barely made it through High School.
In 1st grade they teach you to put your name at the top of your work. Were you gone that day?
Prof Janet Halley certainly didn't forget that lesson, she put her name right at the top, yet you say her name is nowhere to be found. where are you looking for it? In the margins? Scrawled on a napkin and attached to the review by paperclip?
Do you really think The Harvard Review publishes anonymous material?
Stop being so fucking dumb.
View attachment 3360789