AURORA CANNABIS ENTERPRISES SCARED OF OWN SHADOW worst lighting ever prompts deleting photos online.

Do you trust a company who forces removing photos of their STREETLAMPS


  • Total voters
    8

leaffan

Well-Known Member
Your nucking fut's. This is my last attempt to communicate with you Pete.

"Not defending your self admits guilt"

That's ridiculous, your accusations are ludicris, and unfounded.

"Now what are the lumen per square foot of those street lamps"

Lumen are irrelevant in growing plants, however cannabis is a high light plant and can tolerate 1000micomole, lettuce is around 300micromole. Those street lights produce 2100 micromoles at 1ft from the fixture, at 3ft it's 1000micromole. Perfect for cannabis, and away from the heat of the bulb and ballast. Which if you knew anything about new digital technology ballasts they run virtually with no heat. They are attached directly to the shade and bulb to eliminate RF (radio frequency) interference. Ever tried to use a phone or tablet in a room with 50 lights? Try in a facility with 500 lights or 1000 lights. Every one of those cables from the ballast to the bulb acts like an antenna. Even your tinfoil hat and sunglasses wouldn't protect you.

General rule of thumb Pete, 50 watts per square foot up to 100 watts per square foot was the old way of thinking. Now science is contributing to growing cannabis indoors.

Par and micromoles is the science behind lighting, to grow plants. A lumen is how well a human can see in a wharehouse, nothing to do with growing. Educate yourself, Pete. Or this will be my last lesson.

Itsme.
I appreciate the information, thank you
 
Your nucking fut's. This is my last attempt to communicate with you Pete.

"Not defending your self admits guilt"

That's ridiculous, your accusations are ludicris, and unfounded.

"Now what are the lumen per square foot of those street lamps"

Lumen are irrelevant in growing plants, however cannabis is a high light plant and can tolerate 1000micomole, lettuce is around 300micromole. Those street lights produce 2100 micromoles at 1ft from the fixture, at 3ft it's 1000micromole. Perfect for cannabis, and away from the heat of the bulb and ballast. Which if you knew anything about new digital technology ballasts they run virtually with no heat. They are attached directly to the shade and bulb to eliminate RF (radio frequency) interference. Ever tried to use a phone or tablet in a room with 50 lights? Try in a facility with 500 lights or 1000 lights. Every one of those cables from the ballast to the bulb acts like an antenna. Even your tinfoil hat and sunglasses wouldn't protect you.

General rule of thumb Pete, 50 watts per square foot up to 100 watts per square foot was the old way of thinking. Now science is contributing to growing cannabis indoors.

Par and micromoles is the science behind lighting, to grow plants. A lumen is how well a human can see in a wharehouse, nothing to do with growing. Educate yourself, Pete. Or this will be my last lesson.

Itsme.
Again.. Whoever paid you got ripped off. Stating that lettuce cannot tolerate full sunlight is ridiculous. Your 3 feet away lights being half the intensity of 1foot is also very wrong. Distance is inversely proportional to the square of intensity when making light calculations. Thus 3 times the distance equates to 1/9th the intensity. You need 9 times the lights. This is because you bought street lamps which are hot. You broke the NDA only to make a fool out of yourself. This is physics, one of my specialities. The only thing to do now is stop talking nonsense. The world is listening to you and you can't delete this thread to cover up your foolishness. You got called out with your fake Rastafarian foolishness and now your lack of understanding simple math. You misguided Aurora and broke NDA. Not too BRIGHT. Horace Andy - In The Light (label B).jpg
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
Again you are talking about lighting a wharehouse for humans and light intensity. Which has nothing to do with growing plants, Photosynthetically active radiation. PAR. Is the measurement of photons that hit a square metre(3ft) per second.

We are done, I'm done wasting my time on you.

Itsme.
 
Again you are talking about lighting a wharehouse for humans and light intensity. Which has nothing to do with growing plants, Photosynthetically active radiation. PAR. Is the measurement of photons that hit a square metre(3ft) per second.

We are done, I'm done wasting my time on you.

Itsme.
even if talking water sprinkler... The intensity of water will spread out to one ninth in triple the distance. Usable spectrum is a whole different issue which all the blue light indicates that you know nothing about that either. Take a highschool physics course and stop repeating yourself. Your warehouse reference indicates you know nothing about the basic principles of light. It spreads out and loses intensity. Again you broke the NDA and showed what horrible street lamps with ballast attached Aurora has and have damaged the company in reputation transparency deemed Aurora incompetent. There is no help for ITSMEHIGH nor anyone who has taken his ridiculous lighting advice.sprinkler-repair-spokane.gif
Again the only thing now to do is stop talking nonsense and hope you don't get burned for breaking NDA. STREETLAMPS...Foolish..
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
BREAKING NEWS!
Peter Tosh works for Monsanto. Proper grow lighting destroys their genetics and Petey wants to save them. I think his posts are written by Bill Gates...they just ooze intellect.
 
Any more street lamp supporters here? I have the photo of Aurora in full colour and it is really funny to think they wanted to hide it by removing a thread on roll it up. Who the cap fits.. Let them wear it..Modern_street_lamp.jpg
 
STREETLAMPS. Why even look beyond the STREETLAMPS? Where is their starting material coming from? Why not start with finished MMAR plants? Isn't that what starting materials mean?
 
Top