OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
thankyou!
i have been corrected
i thought it was the E-Papillon
Gavita's rock
i have been corrected
i thought it was the E-Papillon
Gavita's rock
What your referring to is the law of inverse squares, which does mean your lumens are spread out the further up they hang, but if other lights are providing side lighting you need to factor this in.Again.. Whoever paid you got ripped off. Stating that lettuce cannot tolerate full sunlight is ridiculous. Your 3 feet away lights being half the intensity of 1foot is also very wrong. Distance is inversely proportional to the square of intensity when making light calculations. Thus 3 times the distance equates to 1/9th the intensity. You need 9 times the lights. This is because you bought street lamps which are hot. You broke the NDA only to make a fool out of yourself. This is physics, one of my specialities. The only thing to do now is stop talking nonsense. The world is listening to you and you can't delete this thread to cover up your foolishness. You got called out with your fake Rastafarian foolishness and now your lack of understanding simple math. You misguided Aurora and broke NDA. Not too BRIGHT. View attachment 3360414
lolThat's the one. Thanks. Interesting how these STREETLAMPS are not advertised in any cannabis magazine. That reflector is dope. Haha. Aurora is out 10 million. Big hill to climb with no lights. Or brains.View attachment 3370262
I love it when someone who really knows their shit comes in and gives Peter a good lesson.
Why do I get the feeling there is a white punk wannabe rasta frantically Googling info on Gavita's at this very moment?
We used to call it book smart. Now I call it Google smart. A whole generation coming up who think they know everything but couldnt get a campfire going with a fucking bic lighter
Again.. Whoever paid you got ripped off. Stating that lettuce cannot tolerate full sunlight is ridiculous. Your 3 feet away lights being half the intensity of 1foot is also very wrong. Distance is inversely proportional to the square of intensity when making light calculations. Thus 3 times the distance equates to 1/9th the intensity. You need 9 times the lights. This is because you bought street lamps which are hot. You broke the NDA only to make a fool out of yourself. This is physics, one of my specialities. The only thing to do now is stop talking nonsense. The world is listening to you and you can't delete this thread to cover up your foolishness. You got called out with your fake Rastafarian foolishness and now your lack of understanding simple math. You misguided Aurora and broke NDA. Not too BRIGHT. View attachment 3360414
Name the lights... Photos Taken from newspaper article of aurora.Just watched the video of the auroras facility...
The funny thing is, that setup is fire!!
Those hoods are so close they are hitting well above target PAR. The reason they are not vented is the ceiling space. Radiant heat rises, and with what looks like over 10,000cfm of ventilation atleast it will be much more cost effective to cool the room rather than the hoods themselves.
Have you any experience with commercial ag? Cause your small change as far as I can tell, so wondering why your critiquing the big dogs. You main beef is their lighting lol. Which by my calculations is more than adequate. (Google inverse square law, factor watt people sq foot)
With the side lighting and overlap your ridiculous if you think they skimped on the setup.
Rookies..
TruthRadiant Heat Radiates. It is directed from the source outward. Radiant heat does not rise.View attachment 3371642
It is nice to see a detailed post. Nice to see things being thought out. Now if the plant tops are 3.5 feet away. What are the lumens hitting the bottom of the plant 4.5+ feet away? The sun doesn't have that bottom branch problem. Neither does air cooled on rails six inches from the tops. BIAS comes from Aurora getting Roll it up to remove a thread about them. Anyone who controls and filters media is bad news. That form of opression brings up some serious red flags about the transparency of such a company. Who the cap fits let them wear it. Freedom of speech is a must. Freedom is a must.Truth
But do you think this is going to be a stagnate environment?
From the ventwork shown in the video I saw, I guarantee there is extensive A.C. running.
Cool air falls, creating an insulator.
While the radiant heat from the hoods themselves won't rise, it won't "fall" either. The heat emitted into the air itself will rise until its at an elevation containing simular temps.
Cool air being dumped low, hot air being sucked from top.
With a huge space this is much more practical. No need for vented hoods, they have enough lights hanging to be 3.5' from the canopy with ample lumen coverage.
The glass is taking away about 6% of PAR, and also emitting heat, but there's probably no way around having glass in your hoods with regulations.
I dont really see what your argument is anymore.
Is it really all about the "brand" now?
Because before you were preaching they we "street lamps" due to the connected b allasts. Afew people posted eexamples of lights meant for growing with the same design, you switch to sub par lumens.
After I proved that wrong, now your all about the "brand"?
News flash, China can make ballasts with the same capacities as American made... but cheaper. Just because they outsourced to save cash doesnt mean they totally skimped on assembly.
Can you even actually put your finger on the reason behind your bias?
Their pictures are all over the internet. I highly doubt they *forced* RUI to remove anything. Wheres tje proof? Any moderators that can shed light on this?It is nice to see a detailed post. Nice to see things being thought out. Now if the plant tops are 3.5 feet away. What are the lumens hitting the bottom of the plant 4.5+ feet away? The sun doesn't have that bottom branch problem. Neither does air cooled on rails six inches from the tops. BIAS comes from Aurora getting Roll it up to remove a thread about them. Anyone who controls and filters media is bad news. That form of opression brings up some serious red flags about the transparency of such a company. Who the cap fits let them wear it. Freedom of speech is a must. Freedom is a must.View attachment 3372067
These pictures showed up on Twitter and I copy and pasted them here. Soon after they were deleted, because Aurrora claimed the pictures were in breech of a NDA, and either threatened or requested RIU to remove them. Then Tosh tried to associate me with Aurora claiming that I took the pictures and set up the facility, and I was in breech of the NDA, total rubbish.Is it a legality?
Either way,its fun debating with googlers