Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
We're not talking about the check you get, "Anarchist".The fact is, the only reason you own it is that the gov't took it from its original inhabitants.
We're not talking about the check you get, "Anarchist".The fact is, the only reason you own it is that the gov't took it from its original inhabitants.
He's an anti-Gov't socialist...We're not talking about the check you get, "Anarchist".
Letting others define our reality can be dangerous. For instance, many political borders tend to be imaginary lines....You are living in a first world country and arguing with another first world citizen. None of you ideas apply outside of our protected borders. Try telling this to MS-13.
I agree, his position does seem to rely on a contradiction and the existence of a central authority doesn't it?He's an anti-Gov't socialist...
You can't get much moar retarded than that.
Speaking of contradictions, if you're so opposed to socialism, why do you often quote socialists like George Orwell and Lysander Spooner?I agree, his position does seem to rely on a contradiction and the existence of a central authority doesn't it?
Neither can forced socialism, but a free market can.Capitalism can not exist without government to protect private property.
We're talking about the land you bitch about paying property taxes on. You only own it because the gov't took it from its original inhabitants.We're not talking about the check you get, "Anarchist".
Ah, so now you're a socialist who opposes private property.Neither can forced socialism, but a free market can.
Speaking of contradictions, if you're so opposed to socialism, why do you often quote socialists like George Orwell and Lysander Spooner?
The actual reason is that anarchism is a form of socialism. There is no such thing as Anarchocapitalism. You want to quote anarchists, but they're all socialists.It's not contradictory to acknowledge a good idea, even if the person espousing it doesn't measure up to your ideals in every other way.
No. I am an individual that rejects forced collectivism and embraces free and consensual human interactions.Ah, so now you're a socialist who opposes private property.
The actual reason is that anarchism is a form of socialism. There is no such thing as Anarchocapitalism. You want to quote anarchists, but they're all socialists.
Private property is not free or consensual.No. I am an individual that rejects forced collectivism and embraces free and consensual human interactions.
When you use the words of a socialist to express your views, you are either endorsing their views (socialism) or pulling something out of context to distort their views.Quoting a person isn't a blanket endorsement or rejection of them, is it?
Private property is not free or consensual.
So you concede that my point is valid.Okay.
Not really. You might coin a good saying, that doesn't mean by repeating what you say in that instance, I am embracing every other thing you say or have said, some of which I might find objectionable or inaccurate.When you use the words of a socialist to express your views, you are either endorsing their views (socialism) or pulling something out of context to distort their views.
So you concede that my point is valid.
Notice that I don't acknowledge your hypothetical bs because we live in reality.
Yes really. The word libertarian was coined by a socialist. You're not just quoting socialists in order to describe your philosophy but the actual pioneers of your philosophy are so reproachable that you refuse to quote them.Not really.