Flip Chip Opto High Power Build Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, when Green and Scotch get this defensive, it means I busted them. :)

And I didn't evoke them with @, so they must be reading it.
 
Lol then hang a shit ton of em and call it a day. Save yourself some money. O wait, they don't sell them anymore. I wonder what could've driven them to that....inefficient, safety (mercury)? Hm...

Loud and clear. Consider me Stan.

 
Scotch089 said:
Lol then hang a shit ton of em and call it a day. Save yourself some money. O wait, they don't sell them anymore. I wonder what could've driven them to that....inefficient, safety (mercury)? Hm...

Loud and clear. Consider me Stan.

Click to expand...

Incandescents are not for horticulture. Everyone knows that.
 
Lol no 25% efficient light source is for horticulture, or an industry. Obviously.

But hell they have close to 100 CRI so at this point I think that'd be a better option. I set my ego aside for a living, frankly it is nonexistent, if you gave a shit to respect anyone than your own ideas you'd probably realize that. Prime example is me trying to move past this, eh?
 
My problem is with you being a rude dick, trying to diminish anything I have to say just for the hell of it. Then after the outburst, you pick it up and continue to try and diminish me and my contribution. And if you were correct or I was off I would have no problems admitting it. But that isn't the case and if it was you would need to actually show how/why. If you said nothing that is fine, but you don't, you try and turn me into something negative. You have not shown anything to support your arguments. You have not countered anything I have presented with any valid info. When ever I get involved you resort to name calling and a small tantrum to deflect.
 
Scotch089 said:
Lol no 25% efficient light source is for horticulture, or an industry. Obviously.

But hell they have close to 100 CRI so at this point I think that'd be a better option. I set my ego aside for a living, frankly it is nonexistent, if you gave a shit to respect anyone than your own ideas you'd probably realize that. Prime example is me trying to move past this, eh?
Click to expand...

Are you moving past? The first sway guess was 25% effecint running at the recommended boost current.

Did I recommend that? No.

Did I say I would build a system, for myself that wastes that much Kwh.

HELL No.

I said I was researching a patent. That is something I do for a living.

So you do ride the Ego High Horse with a shield of scorn and are quite self deceived.
 
Last edited:
Greengenes707 said:
My problem is with you being a rude dick, trying to diminish anything I have to say just for the hell of it. Then after the outburst, you pick it up and continue to try and diminish me and my contribution. And if you were correct or I was off I would have no problems admitting it. But that isn't the case and if it was you would need to actually show how/why. If you said nothing that is fine, but you don't, you try and turn me into something negative. You have not shown anything to support your arguments. You have not countered anything I have presented with any valid info. When ever I get involved you resort to name calling and a small tantrum to deflect.
Click to expand...

Go far away and never return. I am not having an argument.

You are a fight boy.
 
I am researching a patent your poor jerks, if you have a problem with that you could just go suck rocks.
 
So just for kicks...
Did I tell you to change your design when offering suggestions?
Did I offer anything that makes you design worse?
Did I explain and show evidence of everything I recommended or posted?
Did I explain to you concepts that you were misunderstanding
Did I defend my own self against unwarranted attacks?
 
SupraSPL said:
Yes sunlight has an LER. In space, it is about 5000K 100 CRi. So LER is about 280lm/W (my conjecture)

While you are extracting LER from an SPD curve, you will also come across another useful number, the umol/PAR W constant for that particular SPD curve. That allows us to convert from % efficiency into umol/W.

One that I am familiar with is the CXA 3000K, the figure is 4.88umol/W. So a 50% efficient CXA 3000K would create 2.44umol/ dissipation W.
Click to expand...

LER of the sun in space is significantly lower because of the ionizing radiation (cosmic, gamma, xray, UVC, UVB), and the infrared region. (non-visible, but tremendous amounts of energy radiated. LER of the sun is more like 93lm/W according to wikipedia. Truncated LER might be 280lm/W.
 
Well, the problem is the human eye is not a good detector.

lightresponse.gif
 
Doer said:
No one is attacking but you
Click to expand...
Really?
This is how it all started...
Screen Shot 2015-03-16 at 11.13.57 AM.png

So show me where I attacked you here or before this...There is one post of you and me before this one...and there is no attack there either.
You are the one attacking.
You can just not respond and we are done. But if you care to keep this going I have all day to show you every time you are wrong and lying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top