record low maximum arctic sea ice

[see4]

Your opinion means nothing to me. If I reply to you it's simply to pull your chain. I live my life based on me. You have no affect on me whatsoever. I don't need to prove anything here. I'm demanding nothing from nobody.

You, on the other hand ... lol

So you are simply wasting your time on a website you care nothing about, on people you care nothing about, just simply to pull people's chain?

That is a very very sad existence. I really honestly feel bad for you. I mean that with all sincerity.

 

[see4]

Actually there are people who realize if you were truly interested in peer reviewed articles that contradict the consensus you could use google and entertain yourself for hours.

This is how blindly religious you are. You are claiming that one was a blog post and I posted a magazine article. All I did was post the same exact link with 1350 links containing what you asked for that was already posted. It wasn't even my link, it was one from a few pages ago that you dismissed. You can't even tell it was the same link, that's how much you "care" about your research.

No, nobody believes you are on the hunt for information, you can go ahead and stop trying, it just makes you look even more pitiful the more you do it. Well, actually keep doing it, it really is kinda entertaining.

No, what it means is that he has presented you with a series are information that are based on fact that derive a conclusion. You, and your Klansmen, have shared your feelings with no evidence of fact to contradict the proposed data. And when he asked for you to cite something that is both factual and credible, you get defensive and start name calling.

I whole heartedly want to meet some of you people in person. I really hope I get that opportunity one day.

 

[sheskunk]

So you are simply wasting your time on a website you care nothing about, on people you care nothing about, just simply to pull people's chain?

That is a very very sad existence. I really honestly feel bad for you. I mean that with all sincerity.

So I assume you are here for some greater cause?

Tell us more about your penis.

 

[ginwilly]

No, what it means is that he has presented you with a series are information that are based on fact that derive a conclusion. You, and your Klansmen, have shared your feelings with no evidence of fact to contradict the proposed data. And when he asked for you to cite something that is both factual and credible, you get defensive and start name calling.

I whole heartedly want to meet some of you people in person. I really hope I get that opportunity one day.

I keep forgetting which one you are.

You have me confused with a denier, but I've noticed you assign positions to people on the reg that they don't actually represent. Much easier to take down that strawman though than a position you don't understand. Can't say I blame you.

You do realize that a vast majority still leaves a minority. To see the minority of peer reviewed studies that have been published, there has been a fancy new tool invented called a search engine. If I were truly interested in those, I would do a search myself instead of demanding someone do it for me on a pot forum. That's just me though, I learned how to "google" a long time ago.

 

[see4]

So I assume you are here for some greater cause?

Tell us more about your penis.

Well, my penis has never mailed large sums of drugs across state lines by mail, that would just be full on retarded. And my penis has never been ass fucked in jail, so that's a good thing. And my penis doesn't know how to make shitty pieces of glass. I'd say all in all, my penis is doing quite well thank you for inquiring about my penis.

I'm here to give advice to some, entertain others, and try my best to weed out those who support racist, rapist causes. Sort of like those who support right wing moral leaders like Robertson who believe that it's ok to rape and murder women and children. I suspect by your interactions with me, that you are that type of person. Otherwise you'd be in agreement with me on some of the things I've said.

But honestly, we weren't talking about me, we were talking about you. Stop deflecting, be a fucking man, and own up to your bullshit. Bitch.

 

[see4]

I keep forgetting which one you are.

You have me confused with a denier, but I've noticed you assign positions to people on the reg that they don't actually represent. Much easier to take down that strawman though than a position you don't understand. Can't say I blame you.

You do realize that a vast majority still leaves a minority. To see the minority of peer reviewed studies that have been published, there has been a fancy new tool invented called a search engine. If I were truly interested in those, I would do a search myself instead of demanding someone do it for me on a pot forum. That's just me though, I learned how to "google" a long time ago.

You don't ever actually own up to any position. You sort of state an opinion on something, very wishy washy, but the when called out on, you back away and pull this shit I just quoted.

How about you state and clear position on something, then go from there. And maybe once and a while how about you answer a direct question.

 

[see4]

I would do a search myself instead of demanding someone do it for me on a pot forum. That's just me though, I learned how to "google" a long time ago.

lol. Google uses some of my code in some of its web applications. Don't lecture me on the internet.

 

[ginwilly]

You don't ever actually own up to any position. You sort of state an opinion on something, very wishy washy, but the when called out on, you back away and pull this shit I just quoted.

How about you state and clear position on something, then go from there. And maybe once and a while how about you answer a direct question.

You are so fos I'm leaning toward you are actually UB.

I've stated many times I believe man is at least partially to cause for climate change.

What I refuse to do is dismiss the fact that there are qualified scientists in the minority who have a differing opinion. That's borderline insanity in the face of fact that the consensus is not 100%.

I also refuse to post a graph that uses only the high side of a variable equation to prove my point. I refuse to post pictures of 100 ft cliff and claim that road will be under water. You can call that stance wishy washy if it suits your agenda, it's kinda your thing.

The climatereligtards do nothing but fuel the flames of skepticism.

 

[sheskunk]

Well, my penis has never mailed large sums of drugs across state lines by mail, that would just be full on retarded. And my penis has never been ass fucked in jail, so that's a good thing. And my penis doesn't know how to make shitty pieces of glass. I'd say all in all, my penis is doing quite well thank you for inquiring about my penis.

I'm here to give advice to some, entertain others, and try my best to weed out those who support racist, rapist causes. Sort of like those who support right wing moral leaders like Robertson who believe that it's ok to rape and murder women and children. I suspect by your interactions with me, that you are that type of person. Otherwise you'd be in agreement with me on some of the things I've said.

But honestly, we weren't talking about me, we were talking about you. Stop deflecting, be a fucking man, and own up to your bullshit. Bitch.

You mean absolutely nothing to me.

Please continue.

 

[Pinworm]

 

[abandonconflict]

Well, my penis has never mailed large sums of drugs across state lines by mail, that would just be full on retarded. And my penis has never been ass fucked in jail, so that's a good thing. And my penis doesn't know how to make shitty pieces of glass. I'd say all in all, my penis is doing quite well thank you for inquiring about my penis.

I'm here to give advice to some, entertain others, and try my best to weed out those who support racist, rapist causes. Sort of like those who support right wing moral leaders like Robertson who believe that it's ok to rape and murder women and children. I suspect by your interactions with me, that you are that type of person. Otherwise you'd be in agreement with me on some of the things I've said.

But honestly, we weren't talking about me, we were talking about you. Stop deflecting, be a fucking man, and own up to your bullshit. Bitch.

Pwnt

 

[abandonconflict]

You are so fos I'm leaning toward you are actually UB.

I've stated many times I believe man is at least partially to cause for climate change.

What I refuse to do is dismiss the fact that there are qualified scientists in the minority who have a differing opinion. That's borderline insanity in the face of fact that the consensus is not 100%.

I also refuse to post a graph that uses only the high side of a variable equation to prove my point. I refuse to post pictures of 100 ft cliff and claim that road will be under water. You can call that stance wishy washy if it suits your agenda, it's kinda your thing.

The climatereligtards do nothing but fuel the flames of skepticism.

Magazine article.

 

[UncleBuck]

The first one I looked at didn't contradict the consensus. The second was a controversial piece by Lindzen which has had holes poked in it by objective scientists. The third I looked at didn't contradict the consensus. Then I noticed a pattern and regretted wasting my time on third-party bullshit.

I'm still waiting for someone to cite a peer-reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists.

yeah, anything by lindzen can be automatically discarded.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

You can literally taste the liberal fear in the air. They have whipped themselves up into a frenzy because they know the party is almost over. Can you imagine how batshit they'll be if they lose the White House?

There is nothing sweeter than feeding on the tears of a liberal. Mmm, mmm good.

 

[UncleBuck]

I learned long ago not to argue religion

religion has no predictive value. climate science does.

hence, you are a fucking idiot.

 

[UncleBuck]

Your stance is adding fuel to the fire for the deniers, well done religious whacko.

no, you're stuck on denial no matter what he says, retard.

 

[UncleBuck]

You have no affect on me whatsoever.

all the meltdowns and crying to the mods says otherwise.

 

[sheskunk]

So much butthurt. So entertaining. Beats what's on TV tonight. Thanks for all the rage. It's always good for a laugh.

 

[UncleBuck]

Actually there are people who realize if you were truly interested in peer reviewed articles that contradict the consensus you could use google and entertain yourself for hours.

This is how blindly religious you are. You are claiming that one was a blog post and I posted a magazine article. All I did was post the same exact link with 1350 links containing what you asked for that was already posted. It wasn't even my link, it was one from a few pages ago that you dismissed. You can't even tell it was the same link, that's how much you "care" about your research.

No, nobody believes you are on the hunt for information, you can go ahead and stop trying, it just makes you look even more pitiful the more you do it. Well, actually keep doing it, it really is kinda entertaining.

no, have a meltdown. i insist.

 

[UncleBuck]

You have me confused with a denier.

lol.