Arkansas state senator Bart Hester gets owned trying to defend 'religious freedom' bill

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Destroying the constitution is the progressive agenda. Many who value individual freedom are fighting to keep the the US a free, constitutional republic. We'll see who wins in due time.
Click to expand...
You're the one that just admitted you would support a law that effectively eliminates the 1st amendment to the Constitution..

Do you ever think before you try to make a point or just blab out whatever comes to your mind first?
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You're the one that just admitted you would support a law that effectively eliminates the 1st amendment to the Constitution..

Do you ever think before you try to make a point or just blab out whatever comes to your mind first?
Click to expand...
It's clear that you don't have the first clue what 1A means. You seem to think the government gets to mandate that I associate with Christians. It doesn't. Nor does it mean that I cannot associate with Christians. "Free association" means that I am free to associate with whomever I choose, and for whatever reasons I choose.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Why do progressives loathe the constitution? Is it because it's "like 200 years old, dude, and was written by white guys."?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
It's clear that you don't have the first clue what 1A means. You seem to think the government gets to mandate that I associate with Christians. It doesn't. Nor does it mean that I cannot associate with Christians. "Free association" means that I am free to associate with whomever I choose, and for whatever reasons I choose.
Click to expand...
the supreme court didn't see it that way when they tried civil rights. they certainly don't think you're entitled to kick black people out of your store, even though we all know that is what you would like to do.

why did you join a white supremacy group?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
It's clear that you don't have the first clue what 1A means. You seem to think the government gets to mandate that I associate with Christians. It doesn't. Nor does it mean that I cannot associate with Christians. "Free association" means that I am free to associate with whomever I choose, and for whatever reasons I choose.
Click to expand...
You just said you would support a law that would allow me to deny the sale of goods/services to Christians based on my religious beliefs and you don't think that goes against the Constitution?

Why don't religious people have the right to discriminate against black people based on their religious beliefs?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Answer the question. If I as a business owner denied Christians the sale of goods/services because it's against my religious belief, would you support that position or not?
Click to expand...
I would. Well. not you, but someone else. YOU should be forced to serve everyone because you like to force people to your desires. Let's be honest here, you'll never own a business. You couldn't even manage a paper route.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
You just said you would support a law that would allow me to deny the sale of goods/services to Christians based on my religious beliefs and you don't think that goes against the Constitution?

Why don't religious people have the right to discriminate against black people based on their religious beliefs?
Click to expand...
You aren't asking about the sale of goods and services, tho. You're demanding the participation and attendence. Totaly different.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
I would. Well. not you, but someone else. YOU should be forced to serve everyone because you like to force people to your desires. Let's be honest here, you'll never own a business. You couldn't even manage a paper route.
Click to expand...
What's the difference between denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their skin color with denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their sexual orientation or identity?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
You aren't asking about the sale of goods and services, tho. You're demanding the participation and attendence. Totaly different.
Click to expand...
Do you think it's OK for a religious business owner to deny the sale of goods/services to someone because he is gay?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
What's the difference between denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their skin color with denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their sexual orientation or identity?
Click to expand...
You're demanding the attendance and participation, not the sale.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top