Don't let this monsterscrogger bother you, just another dude thinks hes some cannabis stud. I don't think the experiment failed. The plants did exactly what nature intended: produce seeds, really good looking seeds at that, I figured the bud size would diminish with such early pollination. Fuck the haters.I will take that as a challenge and i look forward to posting some pictures that are up to your standards.
I hear ya man- don't let them get you down.Im usually pretty good about handling critisism and keep my cool but its been one of those weeks
U know.
Why am i a hater? because i ask a question as to what made him decide hell never do 12/12 again?Don't let this monsterscrogger bother you, just another dude thinks hes some cannabis stud. I don't think the experiment failed. The plants did exactly what nature intended: produce seeds, really good looking seeds at that, I figured the bud size would diminish with such early pollination. Fuck the haters.
not me. i want both.Everyone claims to want quality over quantity anyway but yet everyones first comment is about the lower yield lol its maddening.
That is the ideal scenario.not me. i want both.
What? The pic u posted didnt show upLooks remarkably like the allbud pheno of super lemon haze .. hardmode4life
its quite possible that on a 6 hour photoperiod your plant received less heat damage and survived the battering a little better than it would of done under 12/12That is the ideal scenario.
With some more fine tuning who knows whats possible. I ran an entire flower cycle of 6/18 and yes my plants seemed to stop growing the second they were pollinated. However other peoole who have since tried the 6/18 are getting better results.
What i learned so far is contrary to popular belief going into this everyone told me that the plants would wilt up and die. They didnt die obviously and in fact preflowering seemed to happen sooner than usual.
In my little cabinet my experiment hit a serious hurdle and stunted but there is reason to experiment further with a new run.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions and i didnt beg anyone to read This thread or believe anything.
If you still think 12/12 is the only way to flower a plant thats fine enjoy it.
16 pages of thread and no where does anyone claim superior results so not sure where that came from.its quite possible that on a 6 hour photoperiod your plant received less heat damage and survived the battering a little better than it would of done under 12/12
even so with just the most basic knowledge of photosynthesis surely it is obvious that a 6 hour photoperiod will result in less photosynthesis occurring
if you were trying a 14 hour on 10 hour off photoperiod and claiming superior results at least you would have the laws of science on your side
peace
I feel like im in a different universe here, what exactly has offended you?I will be doing this whole thing over again as soon as the next set of girls are big enough.
Not sure i will start another thread or not. Im always on here anyway so i probably will but we shall see.
Just like the canadian patient section of this site it just seems that alot of people online joined this site to argue and flex their internet dicks. I never claimed to be the science guru or said i had it all figured out.
I dont consider myself being picked on..I feel like im in a different universe here, what exactly has offended you?
Its a forum its about discussions i dont know why you posted on here if you dont want people to ask questions
I havent seen any malicous or nasty comments towards you at all your acting like your being picked on its ridiculous