BHO federally illegal?

torturekiller420

Well-Known Member
Colorado rec laws do suck, granted im in Oregon under medical now, but our rec laws seem pretty legit and go into effect in about 2 weeks. Were also allowed to grow 4 plants for rec per household. We can have 8 ounces at home, 1 on us while out and about, we can have upto 1 ounce of concentrate, a pound of edibles, and 72oz of fluid(drinks and such)
 

GreenStick85

Well-Known Member
Soon Washington will move it around, soon to grow up to two plants personally although I can't say people aren't going ahead and growing their own for personal use.
Honestly thats my goal.
Im not medically approved although in some circles it could be possible.
Im just not quite ready situationally right now. It would become a good passion for me. It would be great to see the law move forward and see all forms of mj be acceptable and legal on a federal level. Work the greater danger of the drug war, it certainly doesn't exist here
 

7mend07SweetnSticky

Well-Known Member
Back in 1950's before they banned it. It was most commonly consumed through tinctures and edibles. They still smoked hashish. But people really didn't start smoking it until it was banned and harder to find. They used it to treat a paragraph worth or illnesses and deseases. It actually prevents cancer from growing. Its more natural and better for you than Tylenol
 

GreenStick85

Well-Known Member
Yeah seems outrageous. It is. In fact if you have a medical marijuana license you can grow in places such as eastern Washington which has no dispensaries and lets say you have even permits to own a gun in Wa.
If you're caught by federal officials they slap you with a 5-10 year additional for the first firearm found and 25 years for every additional gun after that and that isn't even including the original sentencing! Makes me wish I had continued to argue to someone about this very thing a little bit back but makes
Me wonder if he realized all the laws
Not just his state alone. You may be OK by state but federally....you're fucked up over and out.

Reading this months national geographic I could only find barely a a paragraph of stuff that resembled anything negative about MJ to cautions. Everything else ranged from cbd treatments to comparisons to strains used for pain or nausea caused by cancer or nerve pain to uses of hemp in everyday products. The last time this country freely used hemp was in WW2. Talk about a cash crop that successfully helped the war effort. Then they shut it
All down because someone got red eyes and wanted 6 cheeseburgers and 11 candy bars. Don't think about blaming weed for obesity, it actually does the opposite : )

Legalization will soon become a part the medical trials of pot: soon this will happen and the states will find someone to do this. It is necessary that these are done to ensure that
Marijuana has indeed medicinal properties on paper. So far this is not possible: since it remains illegal there are no accepted medicinal properties according to our federal gov.

Recently the NIDA approved that marijuana kills and/or stops growing new cancer cells. This is only the beginning but it is a breakthrough on a medical scale.
But again to get the fed gov to approve, bills need to be put in effect and get that schedule 1 classification figured out.

They also classify weed in the same category as heroine. Even though its no where near the same[/QUOT
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
Yeah seems outrageous. It is. In fact if you have a medical marijuana license you can grow in places such as eastern Washington which has no dispensaries and lets say you have even permits to own a gun in Wa.
If you're caught by federal officials they slap you with a 5-10 year additional for the first firearm found and 25 years for every additional gun after that and that isn't even including the original sentencing! Makes me wish I had continued to argue to someone about this very thing a little bit back but makes
Me wonder if he realized all the laws
Not just his state alone. You may be OK by state but federally....you're fucked up over and out.

Reading this months national geographic I could only find barely a a paragraph of stuff that resembled anything negative about MJ to cautions. Everything else ranged from cbd treatments to comparisons to strains used for pain or nausea caused by cancer or nerve pain to uses of hemp in everyday products. The last time this country freely used hemp was in WW2. Talk about a cash crop that successfully helped the war effort. Then they shut it
All down because someone got red eyes and wanted 6 cheeseburgers and 11 candy bars. Don't think about blaming weed for obesity, it actually does the opposite : )

Legalization will soon become a part the medical trials of pot: soon this will happen and the states will find someone to do this. It is necessary that these are done to ensure that
Marijuana has indeed medicinal properties on paper. So far this is not possible: since it remains illegal there are no accepted medicinal properties according to our federal gov.

Recently the NIDA approved that marijuana kills and/or stops growing new cancer cells. This is only the beginning but it is a breakthrough on a medical scale.
But again to get the fed gov to approve, bills need to be put in effect and get that schedule 1 classification figured out.

american cancer research center released a study in 2007 saying pretty much the same thing. I That was probably from the last Mississippi grow. U.S. Studies now are finally starting again. I'm sure the politicians will find some way to skew the results or make them up like fox news does. The same politicians have tried to discredited the results of studies from Israel, Spain and the UK labs. There's so many studies already from Oxford University.

it will be like the climate change hearings. Saying the scientists made it up because they got paid to do their job. Even though the politicians get paid from special interest groups and pharmaceutical companies.
 

GreenStick85

Well-Known Member
I feel like its just going to snowball from here on out. Get some small stories but soon even more breakthroughs will be made aware. Its hard to censor such a viable medicine that has so many treatments. If anyone watched the Union documentary, I love it when this one doctor is asked " have you come across any other medicines that are as versatile as marijuana?" the slight pensive pause and serious "no" is extremely straightforward.
 

R&RHashman

Well-Known Member
If they legalize it it better be completely 100% legal. Non of the bs they pulled in Colorado with all the laws and regulations. Sure it's legal. But you can't grow your own. Until it gets put on a bill to be passed as 100% legal my vote will be no.
you can grow your own so I don't know where that came from man
 

GreenStick85

Well-Known Member
you can grow your own so I don't know where that came from man
He. Means I can buy my own in the state of Wa, legal to have an ounce on your person. Can't grow it though. Or rather Colorado that is but buying it somewhat openly. Nowadays the medical marijuana storess are being looped into recreational so selling to 21+ will be the norm and patients will have to go to rec stores to buy. There are some measures to go through soon to grow like 6 plants and have 8 ounces instead
Of 1. Honestly I have more than that but it doesn't matter since I don't carry on my person very often publicly anyways and I can always pass it off as my girlfriends possession if police even wanted to look around but cant do that without a warrant.
 
Last edited:

hyroot

Well-Known Member
I feel like its just going to snowball from here on out. Get some small stories but soon even more breakthroughs will be made aware. Its hard to censor such a viable medicine that has so many treatments. If anyone watched the Union documentary, I love it when this one doctor is asked " have you come across any other medicines that are as versatile as marijuana?" the slight pensive pause and serious "no" is extremely straightforward.
A few days ago bill O'Reilly had a segment on the dangers of marijuana. I was at my mom's house and she likes fox news. They kept quoting studies but wouldn't say anything about the study itself. Everything they said was 100% false. The worst lie they said was that marijuana increases the rate of suicides in young adults and teens. When ptsd was brought up. They redirected the discussion. It wad just so much propaganda b.s. to boost ratings.. so many people including my mom believe what they say. It's so shitty....
 

GreenStick85

Well-Known Member
A few days ago bill O'Reilly had a segment on the dangers of marijuana. I was at my mom's house and she likes fox news. They kept quoting studies but wouldn't say anything about the study itself. Everything they said was 100% false. The worst lie they said was that marijuana increases the rate of suicides in young adults and teens. When ptsd was brought up. They redirected the discussion. It wad just so much propaganda b.s. to boost ratings.. so many people including my mom believe what they say. It's so shitty....
Bill O'Reilly and Nancy...... Two people who use asinine conjecture to make their argument without using Any new material. That "news" is info from the past and full of it. The fact that they can't be legitimate because the trials were never legitimate in the first place. Everyone talks about the monkey trials but folks don't get that it was a test of suffocation not exposure. Sheep will believe media like moth to a flame.
If you can stand it, sit idle. The truth is there but it is ABSOLUTELY maddening when someone just decides to quote or be influenced by famously infamous people. It is taken for granted but it is Wrong, factually wrong. Soon new info is to be put out and that 96 percent of internet negativity of marijuana that is backed up by archaic government opinion will dissipate. The idea is to
right the wrong by letting them admit they got the wrong idea.
They (the uninformed) will eat humble pie, or just get their foot in their mouth, egg on their face for a lack of a better term. Im happy that my parents have accepted good things about pot, they are aware of it but not sure they are aware of my pot smoking.
Heeh but they probably do have an idea since I mention it from time to time. Hard to dispel that rumor.
 

7mend07SweetnSticky

Well-Known Member
Bill O'Reilly and Nancy...... Two people who use asinine conjecture to make their argument without using Any new material. That "news" is info from the past and full of it. The fact that they can't be legitimate because the trials were never legitimate in the first place. Everyone talks about the monkey trials but folks don't get that it was a test of suffocation not exposure. Sheep will believe media like moth to a flame.
If you can stand it, sit idle. The truth is there but it is ABSOLUTELY maddening when someone just decides to quote or be influenced by famously infamous people. It is taken for granted but it is Wrong, factually wrong. Soon new info is to be put out and that 96 percent of internet negativity of marijuana that is backed up by archaic government opinion will dissipate. The idea is to
right the wrong by letting them admit they got the wrong idea.
They (the uninformed) will eat humble pie, or just get their foot in their mouth, egg on their face for a lack of a better term. Im happy that my parents have accepted good things about pot, they are aware of it but not sure they are aware of my pot smoking.
Heeh but they probably do have an idea since I mention it from time to time. Hard to dispel that rumor.
I heard about this monkey trial. But I also heard the monkey lasted 22 hours with no oxygen, nothing but weed smoke. Normal smoke will kill you in minutes...
 

R&RHashman

Well-Known Member
ok im stoned. you understand you can grow your own rec weed in Colorado right? what is wrong with having a strong regulatory framework to help keep the feds at a distance so to speak? while I agree with you that it should be 100% legal you have to get non pot supporters to vote for it and the only way that happens is with promising strong regulation to "protect the children"
 

GreenStick85

Well-Known Member
ok im stoned. you understand you can grow your own rec weed in Colorado right? what is wrong with having a strong regulatory framework to help keep the feds at a distance so to speak? while I agree with you that it should be 100% legal you have to get non pot supporters to vote for it and the only way that happens is with promising strong regulation to "protect the children"
First and foremost that I explained a little while ago that if the feds catch you growing weed, they can throw you in the slammer? Doesn't matter about locality you are medically enabled to grow or whether your state has legalized it. The point to get across to anyone is have legalization across the board. Meaning you can grow it any way you want, provided you pay a tax for it. Its the American Government; they dont want you to be able to do anything for free. Having a grow license would be for personal use, no sales or must give it away. This would be much like buying a fishing license, pay anywhere from 20-60 bucks depending on your grow and you're golden. Rules would apply to be environmentally friendly and stick to a regimen.


Hear me out when I say this that this is just a small proposed plan if legislation made its way through for national legality of marijuana, it would look like this. The federal government just trumps the local police and law but they won't send people to find it unless it is a copious amount.

Correct me if I am wrong but I think the majority of us on this site alone wants something like that legality, it puts money in the system and encourages us to grow openly and protects us on a federal level. I understand folks don't want to have to pay any tax on it but there must be a form of give and take honestly. I don't see the federal law just allowing the people just free pot but rather just tax it and be protected if you have a simple license to grow. They may set statutes but nothing is forever. Grow and smoke openly,
Absolutely.
There is a market waiting to open up so wide, I can't wait to just sit in a cafe or outside and light up in the streets of seattle or boston and not be subject to removal and arrest.
 
Top