No. I said people are not property. Property rights come from government. Human rights come from being human. The problem with your lolbertarian pseudophilosophy is that you think that all rights spring from property.
Actually, no, you are wrong.
Property rights do not require a central government to exist. A central theme and agreement of what a property right IS, would be helpful though. It could then be expressed on an individual person basis, if it can't, it's not really a right is it?
The very existence of a central coercive authority negates the ability of an individual to exercise HIS property rights. Go ahead and refute that...if you can.
Just because government can and does protect THEIR interests by depriving other INDIVIDUAL peoples interests, doesn't mean that protection of property COMES from government as we know it. They (central coercive authorities) employ offensive tactics. Employing offensive tactics is not a real exercise of a property right.
What we need is a multiplicity of SELF GOVERNING individuals for property rights to be fully expressed, not the other way around, as you state, via a central authority.
I also realize in your mothers basement your library of books you like to quote from doesn't cover what I just said and that you are miserably lost in a real discussion.
Might I suggest a real conversation some day?