Confederate flag

[abandonconflict]

Is it Photoshop? I didn't think Ron Paul was like that, all the talk of freedom and shit.

"Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in one maxim: The fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate." -Bertrand Russell

Ron Paul opposed the civil rights act.

 

[abandonconflict]

"very first"
"only"
=2ez.


get to googlin tagteamers.

ILOLz.

Deciphering...

"I don't deny that slavery was the primary cause for the civil war but I'm going to start a polemic and blame you leftists anyway."

 

[NewtoMJ]

"Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in one maxim: The fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate." -Bertrand Russell

Ron Paul opposed the civil rights act.

That's crazy. I thought he was alright, too.

"very first"
"only"
=2ez.


get to googlin tagteamers.

ILOLz.

I look at your posts, and I can't help but wonder "what am I reading".

 

[fobesterdam]

i havent reframed anyones statements to fit my self righteous polemic focus.
guess who has. yet again. and what they have in common.

=2ez.

ILOLz.

 

[Pinworm]

fuck you, dumb sock puppet.

This puppet is beyond dumb. Way beyond dumb. It would take the light from dumb 100 years to catch up to his dumb ass.

I'm gonna go make a sandwich. You guys want anything?

 

[abandonconflict]

i havent reframed anyones statements to fit my self righteous polemic focus.
guess who has. yet again. and what they have in common.

Opposing slavery...

So self righteous.

 

[fobesterdam]

flailing flimsy implications of others supporting slavery.

so inherently righteous that it merits conceding authority and acknowledgement of the self proclaimed moral highground

=2ez.

 

[abandonconflict]

flailing flimsy implications of others supporting slavery.

so inherently righteous that it merits conceding authority and acknowledgement of the self proclaimed moral highground

Does it bother you though?

 

[NewtoMJ]

flailing flimsy implications of others supporting slavery.

so inherently righteous that it merits conceding authority and acknowledgement of the self proclaimed moral highground

Do you have autism?

 

[Pinworm]

flailing flimsy implications of others supporting slavery.

so inherently righteous that it merits conceding authority and acknowledgement of the self proclaimed moral highground

Is that you, Kynes?

 

[DirtyMcCurdy]

fuck you, dumb sock puppet.

Intelligent

they didn't want the government to have so much control?

they were for states rights?

LAUGH OUT LOUD.

are you talking about the same group of southern states that lobbied for and got the fugitive slave act, aka the biggest federal power grab in history to that point?

the south was all about government control and ignoring states rights entirely when it came to getting their runaway slaves back. so excuse me while i laugh my fucking ass off when you claim the south was for states rights, as they trampled all over the will of the free north and cried for government control over them.

i won't even get into your mention of 'social inequalities' in the slaveholding south for fuck sake. that would give me a fucking aneurysm.

the confederacy was about one thing: slavery. hence why every single state that seceded mentioned it as the very first reason for seceding.

I am not going to get dragged into a stupid argument over slavery with some clown shoe who's just loooking for an argument, for fucks sake. Yeah, we all got it. Slavery was 1 reason they seceded.... Moving on then... Let it go dude, let it go.

 

[abandonconflict]

Is that you, Kynes?

Too dumb to be kkkynes, which is really saying a lot.

 

[abandonconflict]

Intelligent


I am not going to get dragged into a stupid argument over slavery with some clown shoe who's just loooking for an argument, for fucks sake. Yeah, we all got it. Slavery was 1 reason they seceded.... Moving on then... Let it go dude, let it go.

You kinda started it.

 

[DirtyMcCurdy]

You kinda started it.

How? By pointing out the fact that the confederate flag isn't all about slavery. But then that doesn't fit into yours or the other morons argument. Because for some reason you guys want to argue about slavery?

 

[abandonconflict]

How? By pointing out the fact that the confederate flag isn't all about slavery. But then that doesn't fit into yours or the other morons argument. Because for some reason you guys want to argue about slavery?

Lol

You really seem to want to argue about the connection between the confederate flag and slavery and to call anyone who disagrees with you 'morons'.

The thread has a theme, and nobody begged for you to post your misguided opinion in it. Just as an FYI, you don't even know my opinion regarding the flag. The war was definitely about slavery, but flags mean nothing to me.

 

[abandonconflict]

Hindu symbol.

 

[fobesterdam]

Yeah, we all got it. Slavery was 1 reason they seceded....

yessir. i just question the use of buckybrah's term "only" in his bingocard-esque nerve struck reaction to your statement. though the term "only" may apply to some self righteous serial ideologue's narrative, it really doesnt seem to apply in the context of reality. but im open to buckybrah's relevance on the matter if he has anything tangible to share.

but you know how "those guys" are when it comes to narratives vs. reality.

thanks for the LOLemic though guys.


is this one as authentic as the "rawn pawl" one?

 

[abandonconflict]

yessir. i just question the use of buckybrah's term "only" in his bingocard-esque nerve struck reaction to your statement. though the term "only" may apply to some self righteous serial ideologue's narrative, it really doesnt seem to apply in the context of reality. but im open to buckybrah's relevance on the matter if he has anything tangible to share.

but you know how "those guys" are when it comes to narratives vs. reality.

thanks for the LOLemic though guys.


is this one as authentic as the "rawn pawl" one?

So you admit that you're "not a fluent historian" regarding the issue but vehemently disagree with the notion that the war was fought solely over slavery. By all means, please elucidate any other causes of the civil war and see how they stand up to examination. That is, unless you're just a self righteous ideologue attempting to foster polemic exchange.

 

[fobesterdam]

"solely"?

"only"?

or "very first"?



this polemic stuff is confusing me. seems one doesnt fit the definition of the others in context though.

i already asked buckybrah to elaborate if he has something tangible to support his SUPPORT of ONLY equating VERY FIRST. LOL. you see, VERY FIRST itself implies other following issues. which is confusing when you would use it to counter the notion that of NOT THE ONLY.

you enlightened ones should be doing the schooling. instead of focusing on random internet users and personality googles.

your focus is self evident. again. my interest at this point, is the LOLemic. again. until the point where something tangible and relevant is shared that is worth pondering. i wont hold my breath. partly due to iLOLification.

call anyone who disagrees with you 'morons'.

iLOL@the irony.

again.

 

[DirtyMcCurdy]

Lol

You really seem to want to argue about the connection between the confederate flag and slavery and to call anyone who disagrees with you 'morons'.

The thread has a theme, and nobody begged for you to post your misguided opinion in it. Just as an FYI, you don't even know my opinion regarding the flag. The war was definitely about slavery, but flags mean nothing to me.

The OP specifically asked for opinions lol. You really that dense? You are a sad individual. Have nothing better to do than try to troll forums. I feel for you... no i don't. fobesterdam has you and unclechucks numbers. Neither of you have anything intelligent to say. But that sure doesn't keep you from posting stupid pics and quotes doing anything you can to sound relevant. Nobody cares about your lame attempts at humor.