actually. you are incorrect. citation would be here..find posts in which i say these things..you can't because i don't speak like that..you're just mad because i'm an educated white female with a good arguments and can easily run circles around yours.It says much about you too schu,..........Do you often say,...."trust me,...or believe me,...or I promise" ....I bet you do,......
similar to oddball1st..To answer the original question how dumb is the GOP.
The GOP has a stupidity so dense it is a singularity of stupid, no intellect can escape its gravity
love guiness..the darker the betterHow about instead of funding Israel, you buy $4 bill per years worth of Guiness off us?
Boost a friendly nation's economy and a healthy dose of iron for the masses.
#effectivenutrition
Once you go black...love guiness..the darker the better
News flash from 1945: We - the US - didn't liberate the Middle East. Everyone else did, and it wasn't really a liberation at that if anything.After liberating the Middle East during WWII, we promised the Jews a place to live and pray. There was nothing left of where they came from, There were treaties and other promises made. The Muslim quickly forget this and want that land back.
How many Americans died in the N African campaign (Patton) ? How many died saving the World from the 3rd ? They owe us nothing over there but to the victor go the spoils, and we got a promise to keep, treaty to honor and them in the way.
Question,...How long did it take Hitler to conquer the Middle East ?
No one talks to you in public, so I'm calling "bullshit". Gee Schuylaar, no one wants to take care of you either, are 60th trimester abortions legal?so i was talking to a women in her 40's republican soccer mom today at mcd..and i'm gonna say very, very dumb..all she knew were talking points..blah, blah..abortion!..right to life!..and i retorted..but you don't want to take care of them once they're here..this did not go over well.
So, warmongers support the deal?"The Iran Deal Benefits U.S. National Security
An Open Letter from Retired Generals and Admirals
On July 14, 2015, after two years of intense international
negotiations, an agreement was announced by the United States,
the United Kingdom, France, Germany, China and Russia to contain
Iran’s nuclear program. We, the undersigned retired military
officers, support the agreement as the most effective means currently
available to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
The international deal blocks the potential pathways to a nuclear
bomb, provides for intrusive verification, and strengthens American
national security. America and our allies, in the Middle East and
around the world, will be safer when this agreement is fully
implemented. It is not based on trust; the deal requires verification
and tough sanctions for failure to comply.
There is no better option to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon.
Military action would be less effective than the deal, assuming it is
fully implemented. If the Iranians cheat, our advanced technology,
intelligence and the inspections will reveal it, and U.S. military
options remain on the table. And if the deal is rejected by America,
the Iranians could have a nuclear weapon within a year. The choice is
that stark.
We agree with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General
Martin Dempsey, who said on July 29, 2015, “[r]elieving the risk of a
nuclear conflict with Iran diplomatically is superior than trying to do
that militarily.”
If at some point it becomes necessary to consider military action
against Iran, gathering sufficient international support for such an
effort would only be possible if we have first given the diplomatic
path a chance. We must exhaust diplomatic options before moving to
military ones.
For these reasons, for the security of our Nation, we call upon
Congress and the American people to support this agreement.
GEN James “Hoss” Cartwright, U.S. Marine Corps
MGEN William L. Nash, U.S. Army
GEN Joseph P. Hoar, U.S. Marine Corps
MGEN Tony Taguba, U.S. Army
GEN Merrill “Tony” McPeak, U.S. Air Force
RADM John Hutson, U.S. Navy
GEN Lloyd W. "Fig" Newton, U.S. Air Force
RADM Malcolm MacKinnon III, U.S. Navy
LGEN Robert G. Gard, Jr., U.S. Army
RADM Edward "Sonny" Masso, U.S. Navy
LGEN Arlen D. Jameson, U.S. Air Force
RADM Joseph Sestak, U.S. Navy
LGEN Frank Kearney, U.S. Army
RADM Garland “Gar” P. Wright, U.S. Navy
LGEN Claudia J. Kennedy, U.S. Army
BGEN John Adams, U.S. Air Force
LGEN Donald L. Kerrick, U.S. Army
BGEN Stephen A. Cheney, U.S. Marine Corps
LGEN Charles P. Otstott, U.S. Army
BGEN Patricia "Pat" Foote, U.S. Army
LGEN Norman R. Seip, U.S. Air Force
BGEN Lawrence E. Gillespie, U.S. Army
LGEN James M. Thompson, U.S. Army
BGEN John Johns, U.S. Army
VADM Kevin P. Green, U.S. Navy
BGEN David McGinnis, U.S. Army
VADM Lee F. Gunn, U.S. Navy
BGEN Stephen Xenakis, U.S. Army
MGEN George Buskirk, US Army
RDML James Arden "Jamie" Barnett, Jr., U.S. Navy
MGEN Paul D. Eaton, U.S. Army
RDML Jay A. DeLoach, U.S. Navy
MGEN Marcelite J. Harris, U.S. Air Force
RDML Harold L. Robinson, U.S. Navy
MGEN Frederick H. Lawson, U.S. Army
RDML Alan Steinman, U.S. Coast Guard"
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/read-an-open-letter-from-retired-generals-and-admirals-on-the-iran-nuclear-deal/1689/
But I suppose you know better than a few dozen generals and admirals...
you know, just when i was enjoying talking to you..and looking forward to your next post.No one talks to you in public, so I'm calling "bullshit". Gee Schuylaar, no one wants to take care of you either, are 60th trimester abortions legal?
Yes, that is an accurate description of your political theories.my brand of connect the dots.
So, we should not honor our treaties?who we? i disagree..the country has an 'under new management' sign in the window..fuck that! we owe them NOTHING.
Come on, we know you love me. When I was 13, I had a perpetual hard on. Those days are long gone.you know, just when i was enjoying talking to you..and looking forward to your next post.
you're about as sexually mature around a girl as doer..age 13
No, your citations either prove you wrong on your sole citation is "Ask Bucky".actually. you are incorrect. citation would be here..find posts in which i say these things..you can't because i don't speak like that..you're just mad because i'm an educated white female with a good arguments and can easily run circles around yours.
amirite?
yeah, red..when the course was still a two state option..which it is no longer is..So, we should not honor our treaties?
"two state option" wasn't mentioned in the treaties. So, nobody's advocating "changing the rules", except you.yeah, red..when the course was still a two state option..which it is no longer is..
when you change the rules?..well..just that.
it was understood. garbage in/garbage out. we no longer wish to support them. plain and simple. only rightie wants to keep the war machine going..because rightie profit$$$$$$$$."two state option" wasn't mentioned in the treaties. So, nobody's advocating "changing the rules", except you.
No, it wasn't "understood". The term wasn't even coined until 6 decades later. "We" no longer wishes to support herself, so "we" doesn't have shit to say about it. Israel isn't the "war machine".it was understood. garbage in/garbage out. we no longer wish to support them. plain and simple. only rightie wants to keep the war machine going..because rightie profit$$$$$$$$.
israel is NOT our friend by any measure..the consensus is, we (american majority) do not wish to assist them any longer. period.No, it wasn't "understood". The term wasn't even coined until 6 decades later. "We" no longer wishes to support herself, so "we" doesn't have shit to say about it. Israel isn't the "war machine".