Official Lolbertarian thread. Discuss the benefits of No goverment

Wavels

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Your comprehension problem is immense. I don't say that to fuck with you, I say it in sincerity.

I've stated that people that can consent, can consent. People that cannot, cannot. The ability to consent isn't something that appears and disappears based on whether you or I like or endorse a given act. It is independent of the act, in most cases.

If a person does not have the wherewithal to consent, they cannot consent. The ability of a person to consent is not fixed at a given age, but generally speaking the older a person becomes the more likely the ability will occur.

If you think different than what I posted above, present your argument as to why my argument is wrong.

In your case if a person does not have the wherewithal to comprehend, they are unable to comprehend. Which is a a nice way of my saying, you're not very bright.
Click to expand...
ChesusRice said:
TLDR
Try yes or no
Click to expand...
Wowee Kazowie!
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Your comprehension problem is immense. I don't say that to fuck with you, I say it in sincerity.

I've stated that people that can consent, can consent. People that cannot, cannot. The ability to consent isn't something that appears and disappears based on whether you or I like or endorse a given act. It is independent of the act, in most cases.

If a person does not have the wherewithal to consent, they cannot consent. The ability of a person to consent is not fixed at a given age, but generally speaking the older a person becomes the more likely the ability will occur.

If you think different than what I posted above, present your argument as to why my argument is wrong.

In your case if a person does not have the wherewithal to comprehend, they are unable to comprehend. Which is a a nice way of my saying, you're not very bright.
Click to expand...
Cheesus is still under the impression that a Libertarian form of government is the same as no government. Weird I know, but I saw LF jump right in and "help". If you can't grasp the simple concept that a libertarian party candidate is trying to work in government means that libertarians still believe in government, then you will never be able to explain the ability to consent to him.

You think that's why we have arbitrary age restrictions on things, like that day you reach an age is magical? It's easier that way. People my brothers age got to drink at 18 until they were 20, then they had to wait until they were 21 as the arbitrary number changed. Unless of course Uncle Sam decided you needed to go kill yellow people, then you could drink at 18.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Cheesus is still under the impression that a Libertarian form of government is the same as no government. Weird I know, but I saw LF jump right in and "help". If you can't grasp the simple concept that a libertarian party candidate is trying to work in government means that libertarians still believe in government, then you will never be able to explain the ability to consent to him.

You think that's why we have arbitrary age restrictions on things, like that day you reach an age is magical? It's easier that way. People my brothers age got to drink at 18 until they were 20, then they had to wait until they were 21 as the arbitrary number changed. Unless of course Uncle Sam decided you needed to go kill yellow people, then you could drink at 18.
Click to expand...
WOW...now I can't ask legitimate questions about how his utopia would work. It seems like you jumping in to save Rob Roy. Rob Roy wants no part of government. Have you been paying attention to what he says ?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Im not the one who let's his Holocaust Guilt let him turn a blind eye to baby dick sucking as long as it's only Jews doing it.

Those Jews a pedophiles and you support their disgusting practices.

Sexualizing infants?

That's the baby dick suckers doing that.

Let me explain it to you one more time:

It doesn't matter who it is, sucking a baby's dick is wrong.

End of story, no more explanation required.
Click to expand...
Holocaust guilt?

No, you're just ananti Semite who sexualities infants.

Kill yourself
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Cheesus is still under the impression that a Libertarian form of government is the same as no government. Weird I know, but I saw LF jump right in and "help". If you can't grasp the simple concept that a libertarian party candidate is trying to work in government means that libertarians still believe in government, then you will never be able to explain the ability to consent to him.

You think that's why we have arbitrary age restrictions on things, like that day you reach an age is magical? It's easier that way. People my brothers age got to drink at 18 until they were 20, then they had to wait until they were 21 as the arbitrary number changed. Unless of course Uncle Sam decided you needed to go kill yellow people, then you could drink at 18.
Click to expand...
Pedophilia laws are not arbitrary you sick fucking perv.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
TLDR
Try yes or no
Click to expand...
You created a thread to specifically discuss Rob Roy's POV and then pull this crap in it?

Seriously, you are a troll and have no interest in gaining any understanding. You are just mad that he pissed in your cheerios...
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
I am interpreting his response as a "no".
Ask your next question, and I'll see if I can translate his response for you in binary code.
Click to expand...
Your interpretation machine is out of oil apparently.

My answer is I am not comfortable with it, don't like it and would prefer it was impossible, but it could only be impossible if it weren't possible. My answer was not intended to be evasive. He asked a question that by his insistence"required" a yes or no answer, when the question to be properly answered needed qualification. I did that. His inability to comprehend the nature of what consent is, is not my problem.

I challenge you to go back read what I said and then refute it. If you don't or can't, I'll know why.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Why does rob Roy refuse to state that it should be illegal for an adult to have sex with a 9 year old?

And why do harrekin, desert douche, and others agree with him?
Click to expand...
The answer to the second question is, they are all smarter than you.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
WOW...now I can't ask legitimate questions about how his utopia would work. It seems like you jumping in to save Rob Roy. Rob Roy wants no part of government. Have you been paying attention to what he says ?
Click to expand...
I want no part of coercion or things which arise from coercion. I'm fine with people forming a club, community or "government" wherein all the people within it are there on a consensual and peaceful basis.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
WOW...now I can't ask legitimate questions about how his utopia would work. It seems like you jumping in to save Rob Roy. Rob Roy wants no part of government. Have you been paying attention to what he says ?
Click to expand...
Sure, that's why I'm confident in saying Rob Roy isn't libertarian. That doesn't stop the peanut gallery from saying stupid shit like move to Somalia if you want libertarianism. Sorry to offend, just pointing out the thread is built on a false premise by a few who are not real bright.

If you want to make fun of people who respect individual rights and want to minimize the intrusiveness of the central planners then have it. Just try to do it without making up things like it's the same as wanting no government.

As far as Rob Roy's philosophy, I've already stated my issues with that. How do we deal with the floor shitters if there is no authority? If there are people that broken during times of a nanny state, can you imagine how they'd be without it? So no, until humanity evolves to the point where people like the floor shitter no longer exists, I can't get behind anarchy.
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Your interpretation machine is out of oil apparently.

My answer is I am not comfortable with it, don't like it and would prefer it was impossible, but it could only be impossible if it weren't possible.

I challenge you to go back read what I said and then refute it. If you don't or can't, I'll know why.
Click to expand...
There is nothing to refute.
Your answer clearly leans to the negative; I just don't understand why you can't bluntly say "no, it is wrong". You--more often than not--seek to obfuscate the response using a style akin to "legalese", tossing in confusing caveats to seemingly cover your ass for no apparent reason. That's just fucking dumb. You only create more problems for yourself by doing so.

If you were in a court of Law in your Utopia, how long do you think it would take before the judge found you in contempt?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I want no part of coercion or things which arise from coercion. I'm fine with people forming a club, community or "government" wherein all the people within it are there on a consensual and peaceful basis.
Click to expand...
heckler73 said:
There is nothing to refute.
Your answer clearly leans to the negative; I just don't understand why you can't bluntly say "no, it is wrong". You--more often than not--seek to obfuscate the response using a style akin to "legalese", tossing in confusing caveats to seemingly cover your ass for no apparent reason. That's just fucking dumb. You only create more problems for yourself by doing so.

If you were in a court of Law in your Utopia, how long do you think it would take before the judge found you in contempt?
Click to expand...
Sorry but his utopia would not have any laws. Laws mean force to Rob Roy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top