Official Lolbertarian thread. Discuss the benefits of No goverment

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
He thinks when he gets to hold the gun, he will shoot happy flowers from it and everyone's life will be better when his ideas run others lives for them. He probably cries at movies too and has a Labrador Retriever with a colorful collar....and a kayak.. and a penchant for saying things like "sustainable" and "buy local"....maybe a little liberal pony tail too.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you think I'm a pretty nice fella. Thanks for the good thoughts. I'd think you were a nice person too if you didn't advocate for the right of pedophiles to have their way with other people's children.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
They would not exist, NOR be maintained in the fashion that they are today. What type of regulations would your Utopia have concerning roads ? Will you have any ? Who does the building ? Who maintains ? Who decides what roads go where. What if we disagree ?
I have more questions about roads after you answer these few.
Click to expand...
The first roads were not built by government, so they indeed would exist. You seem enamored with being told what to think.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You quote them too well for that to be true. Too funny you are.
Click to expand...
You're boring as hell. low IQ Democrats have been using the fox news line for 10 years now. How unoriginal.
You don't even make it entertaining, or follow it up with an argument. Like I said bro, you're boring
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
This is a good talk on Libertarianism


Specifically the section around 16:35. Earlier, Sandel gives the two main requirements based on Robert Nozick's justification of what makes income distribution just; 1. Justice in Acquisition (initial holdings) & 2. Justice in Transfer (free market)

The problem I have with the discrepancy in income is the justice of acquisition for corporations like Walmart or McDonalds. They're very clearly exploiting their employees labor, the fact that they utilize government welfare programs to survive is the evidence. So @ginwilly or @Rob Roy , according to Nozick's interpretation of libertarianism, why do you believe corporations like the ones in my example are justly acquiring their wealth even though they're exploiting their labor force?
Click to expand...
So your solution is to end Welfare?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Nah man, your bike is a "protected class" and your woman should understand that.

Fuck, man...we disagree on alot of shit but don't let her put your balls in her handbag...
Click to expand...
She keeps them on a hook over the kitchen sink. So he can "visit" with them while he washed dishes.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
You're boring as hell. low IQ Democrats have been using the fox news line for 10 years now. How unoriginal.
You don't even make it entertaining, or follow it up with an argument. Like I said bro, you're boring
Click to expand...
Yup, Fox News does this to people. When they don't have anything to say themselves, they start to insult others.

soo, you were the one that posted the cryptic photo of the spill in New Mexico without any explanation. What point were you trying to make? Do you just expect others to carry you along in the conversation so that you can nod knowingly. Every now and then you spout a conservative talking point just so that you can feel a part of the conversation. You call others dumb?
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Yup, Fox News does this to people. When they don't have anything to say themselves, they start to insult others.

soo, you were the one that posted the cryptic photo of the spill in New Mexico without any explanation. What point were you trying to make? Do you just expect others to carry you along in the conversation so that you can nod knowingly. Every now and then you spout a conservative talking point just so that you can feel a part of the conversation. You call others dumb?
Click to expand...
Why are you so defensive about the toxic chemicals? You've been on my ass about this for two days now. Did I make a statement that is contoversial or untrue? If so, then explain and allow me to correct the record
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Red you quoted me 4 seperate times in the one thread.

What the fuck you blowing up my alerts for?

Such a Buck thing to do, bro.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Every private road back then failed financially

Every single one of them
Click to expand...
how does a road fail financially? Are you saying they were toll roads and didn't pay for themselves or something? What about the turnpikes in Ohio, Penn, and KY that have paid for themselves enough times over they have stopped charging tolls in some places.

So your claim is that no private road ever in existence is still around? Or ?... I honestly don't know what you are trying to say.

Were you aware the two bridges into Canada from MI are privately owned? Probably not, or you wouldn't have made that claim. Pretty profitable too. Soooo, if you want to get into Canada from MI, and you only want to travel public roads, it's the tunnel or nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top