OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
You can count those on your hands and,.. more importantly, they were not, that`s not, following scripture or law.
Those Priests were breaking laws, the Muslim are not,...see the difference?
Trump will shut down mosques in America.
- Thread starter BM9AGS
- Start date
You can count those on your hands and,.. more importantly, they were not, that`s not, following scripture or law.
Those Priests were breaking laws, the Muslim are not,...see the difference?
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
How did they take Mosul ? They are still holding it and about twenty other small cities./settlements
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
They will soon have the American lawyer created, United Nation approved, right to Self Determination.
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
I love threads like this cause it shows the true corrupt ways i am friends with Muslims as well believe it or not not once have they pushed me into there religion , they treat me with dignity and respect , and vice versa there no different then you or me actually i am lieing here they are there not arrogant, they rather not fight then start one , they will invite you into there home give you there shirt of there back likesaid above go overand above there ways to make you confortable and food feed you like said above force feed you lol there great people
but its your fucking government that makes them out as bad ,,
you country walks in dictates how they should live take away there dignity embarrass them infront of there Family , and you call your country civilized..
You go into these countries or should i say invade these countries to change there morals and beliefs , over throw there governments to benifit YOU ..
do you not think if rolls were turned around and they did this to each n every one of you you would not resort to what ever ??
Bunch of fucking Hyprocrites USA is
Do onto others as they do onto you
When looking at the Syria crisis Seriously WTF is USA doing there other then causing turmoil again trying to over throw a government
Who in the hell gave USA the right ??? now Russia is there owe how things have changed ..
What Russia has done in 1 week USA has not done in one year but again go to social media and censored news telling everyone there attacking the wrong people
Same people on USA side or same people USA is supporting ..
But the average american brain washed into thinking there the bad people
no wonder USA stats show them as one of the stupiest nations on this earth as for education Cause you sit there blindly and do fuck all
your brain washed into thinking the muslim is bad there the terrorists
Actually if you look at stats on all terrorist acts on USA land you might be shocked who the fuck is the terrorists
But your government and media hides the truth here look at the chart on who is terrorizing
USA
but its your fucking government that makes them out as bad ,,
you country walks in dictates how they should live take away there dignity embarrass them infront of there Family , and you call your country civilized..
You go into these countries or should i say invade these countries to change there morals and beliefs , over throw there governments to benifit YOU ..
do you not think if rolls were turned around and they did this to each n every one of you you would not resort to what ever ??
Bunch of fucking Hyprocrites USA is
Do onto others as they do onto you
When looking at the Syria crisis Seriously WTF is USA doing there other then causing turmoil again trying to over throw a government
Who in the hell gave USA the right ??? now Russia is there owe how things have changed ..
What Russia has done in 1 week USA has not done in one year but again go to social media and censored news telling everyone there attacking the wrong people
Same people on USA side or same people USA is supporting ..
But the average american brain washed into thinking there the bad people
no wonder USA stats show them as one of the stupiest nations on this earth as for education Cause you sit there blindly and do fuck all
your brain washed into thinking the muslim is bad there the terrorists
Actually if you look at stats on all terrorist acts on USA land you might be shocked who the fuck is the terrorists
But your government and media hides the truth here look at the chart on who is terrorizing
USA
pnwmystery
Well-Known Member
You can count the Catholic priests and evangelical pastors that molested and raped children on one hand? Really? Go ahead and google that, and some of these priests and pastors have been doing it for decades.
Cite me where in the Quran it says "Rape little boys." Go ahead.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So you were going to concisely explain how the POTUS has violated the constitution? Or do you prefer not being taken seriously?
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Thought I did when I mentioned the due process thing.
Oh well, thanks for playing, gonna go back to talking to the adults again.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Oh, you're still here? I stopped noticing you after the meltdown you had.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
No, you just made a vague reference to some terrorist and now you're vaguely tying it to due process. Clearly you're unable to form a coherent argument as to how the POTUS violated the constitution. You're even dumber than I thought, which is surprising since I really have no respect for the cognitive abilities of conservatives.
Which executive order did he sign and how was it a violation of the constitution? Which part of the constitution forbade said order?
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
It's only vague to you.
You calling ANYONE here dumb is pretty ballsy of you.
Meltdown!!!
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
deciphering...
"Obama has never actually violated the US constitution. I'm just trolling to impress the rest of the conservitards and birthers around here."
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So nobody can explain how the POTUS has violated the US constitution?
The_Herban_Legend
Well-Known Member
That is a start but if he were to ban all religion, then he would have my attention.
BM9AGS
Well-Known Member
No, think of religion as a how to live your life guide.
For society as a whole they need something intangible to believe in that controls them so to speak. Or forces them to control theirselves. With out it the sheeple would generally love much more corrupt lives.
The_Herban_Legend
Well-Known Member
If you think the Patriot act is constitutional then, nothing will convince you otherwise. Yes, yes, I know it was done under the Bush administration, as Obama called it UNCONSTITUTIONAL as a sitting Senator. Why did he renew the patriot act?
The_Herban_Legend
Well-Known Member
Being associated with a religion does not make you a less corrupt individual. Force education upon all eradicate those who refuse.
BM9AGS
Well-Known Member
I'm talking about the masses. Those who fear an intangible entity judging them for their actions. No different then parents telling children around xmas time that Santa is watching so be good.
Also you can't educate everyone. Large majority cannot think deeply on their own. Look at how many people believe every conspiracy theory they ever hear.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I blame the chemtrails for that.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Don't go thinking I respect the constitution, just because I am familiar with it. Or that I am defending the POTUS, just because I'm not convinced he violated it.
Actually, I want to be convinced otherwise. However, only a cogent argument will suffice. To say a "president has violated the constitution" is quite a statement, yet it is thrown around flippantly. So despite my regular trollery, I assure you, a cogent argument can convince me. I just haven't seen one yet. However, you seem confident that his push to approve extension of Dubya's Patriot Act is in violation of the United States Constitution. I would like to observe your argument.
Which part of the constitution forbids the Patriot Act? I am asking you to be very specific as to how Obama has acted in violation of the Untied States Constitution.
Here is a copy/paste from Heritage.org, which I think we can agree is not biased in favor of Obama:
- It protects civil liberties and provides for the common defense.The Constitution requires the President and Congress to respect and defend individual civil liberties but also provide for the common defense. The Constitution weighs heavily on both sides of the debate over national security and civil liberties—it is important to recognize both factors.
- Expectation of privacy is not unlimited. The Supreme Court has ruled that Americans enjoy a “reasonable” expectation of privacy; however, this is not an unlimited expectation of privacy. This means that anything one exposes voluntarily to the public—or even to a third party—is not considered protected. Congress of course can expand these rights (and it has repeatedly); however, these protections yield to criminal and national security investigations.
- The law provides significant safeguards. The PATRIOT Act does not provide investigators with unfettered power to spy on innocent Americans. What it does do is ensure that national security investigators have the same tools at their disposal to investigate terrorists that law enforcement agents have to investigate and prosecute drug dealers and rapists. These tools come with significant procedural safeguards, oversight, and reporting requirements and are subject to routine and aggressive oversight by the FISA court and Congress.
- It has passed constitutional muster. No single provision of the PATRIOT Act has ever been found unconstitutional. This is a testament to the act’s limited applicability, procedural safeguards, and extensive oversight mechanisms—as well as the fact that it often provides more protections than are afforded in criminal proceedings.
- Disagreements over the role of government are different from actual abuse. Mere expansion of executive authority in the context of national security investigations alone does not in itself create actual abuse. Certainly, there are fundamental disagreements over the role of the executive branch during wartime. However, careful monitoring and vigilant oversight are oftentimes the answer to potential abuses of power—not all-out prohibition.