Do you have any arguments other than "Socialism was bad in the past so that means it's bad now!"? Because I've already explained to you that the kind of socialism I am advocating for is not anywhere near the kind of "socialism" implemented by Stalin in the Soviet Union or Mao in China. Do you think social security is comparable to anything in either of those societies? Universal healthcare? Universal education? A UBI? Economic policies that favor the poor & middle-class?
I'm not going to sit here and argue your position that I've repeatedly told you I don't support.
Are you capable of having an intellectually honest discussion?
So, this time it will be different. That is your argument for "your" socialism?
Who will pay for all the good stuff you think you deserve?
I grew up poor. Very poor. Now, I am middle class. I did that in America, the land of "unequal distribution of income, and racism, and sexism... so, vote for me!"
Ben Carson rose through every economic stratum. In America.
Trump started rich and egotistical, and he remains there.
Barack Obama was born a poor, black child in Hawaii. Now he is the president.
Clarence Thomas was born a share cropper's child. He is now on the US Supreme Court.
Life ain't easy. People are not equal. Some will rise in the economy, and some will fall, and it will be mostly their own doing that determines their outcome. Having a department of equal outcomes will only benefit the politburo.