abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
No thanks, I'm not a fan of extreme right wing propaganda.You might benefit by going to the website Center for a Stateless Society
No thanks, I'm not a fan of extreme right wing propaganda.You might benefit by going to the website Center for a Stateless Society
Actually, I trusted 'the next guy' more. Kennedy may have been the last guy to tell the Joint Chiefs to fuck off. They all sat around a table telling JFK his only hope was to attack and invade Cuba during the missile crisis. If he would have listened to those jerks, there could have been a nuclear exchange. Fortunately he said no, we're not going to be like Japan at Pearl Harbor.He was also a champion of equal rights for all. He had two civil rights bills shot down by the leadership of LBJ and Daddy Gore (isn't that ironic).
He also greatly expanded the military industrial complex before he warned about the expansion. "You can trust me with these toys, but that doesn't mean you can trust the next guy". He was right in a way, we couldn't trust the next guy, or the next, or the next, or the next, but also a hypocrite.
It's considered by some to be "left" libertarian and I thought an inquisitive lad like you might appreciate some of the perspectives. I'd even help with you some of the complex concepts and big words.No thanks, I'm not a fan of extreme right wing propaganda.
Some idiots...It's considered by some to be "left" libertarian and I thought an inquisitive lad like you might appreciate some of the perspectives. I'd even help with you some of the complex concepts and big words.
Okay, maybe you won't need alot of help with the big words...however your actions run contrary to your "knowledge".Some idiots...
Kevin Carson is an ancap who is desperate to redefine the word capitalism in order to distance himself from the people who were historically laisssez faire proponents. One example would be the guy who coined the oxymoronic term "anarchocapitalism", Murray Rothbard.
Like I said, I'm not interested in extreme right-wing propaganda. I clearly know more about it than you do.
@abandonconflict seems paranoid everythings is propaganda after him. I cannot say I blame him considering his pointless military service, but he would be better served doing some soul searching in how it effected him (convinced its good to murder. wheres that on the left/right spectrum?) or perhaps is still effecting him? (ive seen him tout his military schooling as accomplishments) instead of hunting witches like a crazy person, with the other crazy people.Okay, maybe you won't need alot of help with the big words...however your actions run contrary to your "knowledge".
I don't tout people so much as ideas. I think Rothbard had a funny tie.
TL;DR@abandonconflict seems paranoid everythings is propaganda
I dismiss people with stupid ideas.I don't tout people so much as ideas.
The regulations have so many loop holes.There's a very 'dark side' of capitalism that had emerged (or re-emerged) over the last 30 years.
The redistribution of wealth upwards... greedy CEO's... military industrial complex that profits from wars...
Greedy drug companies charging hundreds for drugs that cost a couple dollars to make...
Shrinking middle class that foots the bill for the poor AND the rich....
Tax evading off shore bank accounts... system is a little fucked up these days...
You need to throw the tax code out the window and start again.The regulations have so many loop holes.
Corp get lawyers to find them so they don't pay the taxes.
A simpler tax code would fix this. Try excusing not paying taxes when there are no loop holes to excuse it.
I dismiss people with stupid ideas.
The regulations have so many loop holes.
Corp get lawyers to find them so they don't pay the taxes.
A simpler tax code would fix this. Try excusing not paying taxes when there are no loop holes to excuse it.
Listen RR, I try to take your side on things but taxes need to be collected to keep shit running...Okay, I'll address your statement about excuses, loop holes and taxation etc.
First of all an arbitrary and forcibly imposed tax in itself relies upon a rationalization or "excuse" from the person(s) or entities imposing it and enforcing it. It's really a matter of faulty perspective and fails to consider BOTH the means and the end in the evaluation.
Viewing the situation from the assumption that a forcibly imposed tax is automatically valid and then quickly moving onto how to implement it, ignores the means (method) of how taxation is imposed.
First before we talk about the proper amount of theft and how to equalize and balance the inflicted pain amongst the captive tax payers, whoever they might, we should discuss whether or not the means itself is valid. It is not. Thus what follows, the end (theft) is invalid, no matter how it is distributed or implemented.
Oh look, a new member who talks Marxism even before picking an avatar. So believable.The overthrow of the capitalist system is long overdue. The so-called "good old days" are gone and never coming back. The only class capable of leading humanity forward are the proletariats, but first they must organize. Easier said than done.
Oh look, a new member who talks Marxism even before picking an avatar. So believable.
Oh look, a new member who talks Marxism even before picking an avatar. So believable.
Already have, thanks.At least post in the grow sections first and fucking pretend to be a troll, right?!
You tell me, that's not what I said. I'm just seeing if you're a sock puppet or not.So an avatar makes it okay for me to express an opinion? How silly is that?
Why do you argue this constantly?Okay, I'll address your statement about excuses, loop holes and taxation etc.
First of all an arbitrary and forcibly imposed tax in itself relies upon a rationalization or "excuse" from the person(s) or entities imposing it and enforcing it. It's really a matter of faulty perspective and fails to consider BOTH the means and the end in the evaluation.
Viewing the situation from the assumption that a forcibly imposed tax is automatically valid and then quickly moving onto how to implement it, ignores the means (method) of how taxation is imposed.
First before we talk about the proper amount of theft and how to equalize and balance the inflicted pain amongst the captive tax payers, whoever they might, we should discuss whether or not the means itself is valid. It is not. Thus what follows, the end (theft) is invalid, no matter how it is distributed or implemented.