Not GOP
Well-Known Member
You dont speak for me. I'll decide if the wager is relevant. Loses to who?irrelevant. he will lose. he will not be the GOP nominee or the president.
You dont speak for me. I'll decide if the wager is relevant. Loses to who?irrelevant. he will lose. he will not be the GOP nominee or the president.
I'll decide if the wager is relevant. Loses to who?
The technology part is irrelevant. If Hillary had 100 file cabinets in her basement full of every piece of correspondence during her tenure, the result would be the same. She was briefed on the proper handling of information. She signed the NDA acknowledging that she understood the legal requirements about handling classified information. If somebody else had diverted government email to a non-government server they would already be in jail.
<edit> if the choice is between Hillary and Bernie, then Bernie is the obvious choice, so we agree on that point.
With you, it's just one personal attack after another. Isn't it?notice how you keep falling back on stances like "peoples rights"in these situations? No shit he has the right. that's not what we're talking about.we're discussing the merits of whether he would make a qualified president or not. this is not unlike when in 4th Grade you were studying long division and they made you show your work.
you yourself have the right to vote for trump, no one here is arguing that fact. however if you are going to say it's an intelligent decision we should follow, you will need to show your explanation as to why. if you don't have one based in verifiable fact and not just conjecture then simply stop talking about it.
Cause truly it means you have nothing to say but " Trump = win..because he is rich!"
With you, it's just one personal attack after another. Isn't it?
People quote politicians all the time. You posted that it's stupid to assume Trump is not controlled by corporate money and outside interests. How so?
Not good enough. Until you mention the person you support and believe will be the next Democrat nominee. It's a no deal. Otherwise your odds go up dramatically. duh. I might not be pro, but I have gambled beforelook at you, you pathetic little loser.
i already said who: anyone. he will not get the nomination. he will lose.
can't you read, moron?
Not good enough. Until you mention the person you support and believe will be the next Democrat nominee. It's a no deal. Otherwise your odds go up dramatically. duh
His tax plan says otherwiseHe is corporate money and he"s his own interest?
Like I have already stated many times in the past. I am willing to bet nominee for nominee, but you have refused to participate.are you retarded?
that has nothing to do with the fact that donald trump will lose.
tronald dump will not get the GOP nomination.
and you are too much of a pussy to wager $10,000 on it.
So because he's a successful business man and has money that automatically discludes him from being a good president? Most people could argue the exact opposite
no. And who says it has to be a "he"? Women have every right to run for president, just as much as men do.What if there were an equally good or better choice with no money..should he be precluded from running?
Think very carefully and just focus on the question, not who the candidate is.
In this digital world, you've never violated anyone's TOS..pirating laws etc?
Think very carefully before you answer this.
Feeling The Bern: Ronda Rousey Endorses Bernie Sanders
http://sports.politicususa.com/2015/11/11/feeling-the-bern-ronda-rousey-endorses-bernie-sanders.html
I don't really have an opinion of her. I'm just passing on the info.She's the equivalent of a wife beater. Beat the shit out of her boy friend. No double standard, she's trash along with all the other spousal abusers.
Pretty sure that would be the case will ALL of the candidates.Does Ronda support Bernie because she can whip his ass into submission, like an old beat down dog?
Whats with your inability to understand simple english or take a question for what it is instead of infwring some other meaning?With you, it's just one personal attack after another. Isn't it?
What if there were an equally good or better choice with no money..should he be precluded from running?