Standing O..Bernie Sanders!

S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
The technology part is irrelevant. If Hillary had 100 file cabinets in her basement full of every piece of correspondence during her tenure, the result would be the same. She was briefed on the proper handling of information. She signed the NDA acknowledging that she understood the legal requirements about handling classified information. If somebody else had diverted government email to a non-government server they would already be in jail.

<edit> if the choice is between Hillary and Bernie, then Bernie is the obvious choice, so we agree on that point.
Click to expand...
In this digital world, you've never violated anyone's TOS..pirating laws etc?

Think very carefully before you answer this.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
FauxRoux said:
notice how you keep falling back on stances like "peoples rights"in these situations? No shit he has the right. that's not what we're talking about.we're discussing the merits of whether he would make a qualified president or not. this is not unlike when in 4th Grade you were studying long division and they made you show your work.

you yourself have the right to vote for trump, no one here is arguing that fact. however if you are going to say it's an intelligent decision we should follow, you will need to show your explanation as to why. if you don't have one based in verifiable fact and not just conjecture then simply stop talking about it.

Cause truly it means you have nothing to say but " Trump = win..because he is rich!"
Click to expand...
With you, it's just one personal attack after another. Isn't it?
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
look at you, you pathetic little loser.

i already said who: anyone. he will not get the nomination. he will lose.

can't you read, moron?
Click to expand...
Not good enough. Until you mention the person you support and believe will be the next Democrat nominee. It's a no deal. Otherwise your odds go up dramatically. duh. I might not be pro, but I have gambled before
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
Not good enough. Until you mention the person you support and believe will be the next Democrat nominee. It's a no deal. Otherwise your odds go up dramatically. duh
Click to expand...
are you retarded?

that has nothing to do with the fact that donald trump will lose.

tronald dump will not get the GOP nomination.

and you are too much of a pussy to wager $10,000 on it.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
are you retarded?

that has nothing to do with the fact that donald trump will lose.

tronald dump will not get the GOP nomination.

and you are too much of a pussy to wager $10,000 on it.
Click to expand...
Like I have already stated many times in the past. I am willing to bet nominee for nominee, but you have refused to participate.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
So because he's a successful business man and has money that automatically discludes him from being a good president? Most people could argue the exact opposite
Click to expand...
What if there were an equally good or better choice with no money..should he be precluded from running?

Think very carefully and just focus on the question, not who the candidate is.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
What if there were an equally good or better choice with no money..should he be precluded from running?

Think very carefully and just focus on the question, not who the candidate is.
Click to expand...
no. And who says it has to be a "he"? Women have every right to run for president, just as much as men do.
 
Last edited:
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
In this digital world, you've never violated anyone's TOS..pirating laws etc?

Think very carefully before you answer this.
Click to expand...
Hillary's crime is mishandling of classified, national security information. This has nothing whatever to do with violation of "terms of service" of digital information. The fact that Hillary's emails are in digital form are irrelevant. What is relevant is that those classified communications were stored on a non-government server. It is the same crime committed by Scooter Libby and Paetraeus, but on a MUCH larger scale.

No, I have never mishandled classified, national security information. Besides that, I think it is ridiculous to imply that if somebody pirated a Kanye West CD then he ought to forgive a massive, intentional exposure of the most sensitive classified information possible.

How can you be so dumb as to overlook this monumental lack of judgment on the part of somebody who wants to have her finger on the doomsday-button? Hillary knew what she was doing. She put her own paranoid fear of transparency ahead of her duties as SoS, and ahead of the security of everybody in the US.
 
Not GOP

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Does Ronda support Bernie because she can whip his ass into submission, like an old beat down dog?
 
FauxRoux

FauxRoux

Well-Known Member
Not GOP said:
With you, it's just one personal attack after another. Isn't it?
Click to expand...
Whats with your inability to understand simple english or take a question for what it is instead of infwring some other meaning?

schuylaar said:
What if there were an equally good or better choice with no money..should he be precluded from running?
Click to expand...
You question insinuates Trump is a good choice. He is not. Also his buisness experience seems to be at least half the reason people think hes a worthwhile candidate, so again....that question makes little sense.

Most important I dont think ANYONE should be excluded from running. It's a free country and I support that. I'm just not going to agree with an uneducated opinion about how great he is. Probably not an educated one either....but at least I would politely listen to an exchange of ideas with that person.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top