Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Does this make HIM stupid? Or does it show what he thinks about his target demographic?
I think it says something about both
USA Today is retarded. They don't have a single Republican candidate above 9th grade speaking level. It's the most stupidest thing that anybody could ever take seriously. Rubbing each other's dicks won't make a genie pop out. Time to try a new stradegy
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I guess this means you've run out of arguments. Karl Marx must have left out the part about liberal nut rags like USA Today in his handbook
"Most stupidest" makes no fuckin' sense dummy, "most" qualifies the already qualified portion of the word 'stupid' -"est" already means "most"

That 4th grade Trump speak is for dummies just like you, no wonder you love him
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
"Most stupidest" makes no fuckin' sense dummy, "most" qualifies the already qualified portion of the word 'stupid' -"est" already means "most"
I already know. It's not something a person would normally get corrected on. It was just to put emphasis on"stupidest" Stop trying so hard. It makes you look like a whiny, arrogant, Marxist.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I already know. It's not something a person would normally get corrected on. It was just to put emphasis on"stupidest" Stop trying so hard. It makes you look like a whiny, arrogant, Marxist.
Yeah bro, sure it does, because Karl Marx was all about that grammatically correct sentence structure

Bringing economic theory into a conversation completely absent of it makes you look like an unoriginal doofus. What, you couldn't think of something else to criticize than a fuckin' quote in my sig?

Again, your brain operates on such a low frequency, no wonder that 4th grade Trump speak get's you going! Things like economic policy and foreign policy are far too nuanced for republicans to understand.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
-if a 91% income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans is bad for the economy, then why did the GDP grow at an average of 7% throughout the 1950s?
-because of the military
-if that's true, then shouldn't military expenditures mirror GDP growth? (note: it doesn't, GDP and defense spending fluctuates without significant correlation indicating military spending does not affect overall economic growth)
-incoherent rambling bullshit

Try again, sport
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Awww did you not have a son? Maybe your dna just doesnt produce much testosterone? Or as me and my black friends say, "bitch made"
I asked you why a 91% income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans is bad because when we had it, the economy was good

The top marginal income tax rate has decreased since then, from 91% to 39%, shifting the burden of financing government expenditures onto the poor and middle-class

Ever since then, we've seen a steady decline in economic growth outside of financial bubbles because with such burdens, the poor and middle-class don't have enough money to finance a consumer economy. When poor people don't have money to spend, they don't spend money..


Avoid these facts all you want, with every absent substantive reply you strengthen my position
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
"Most stupidest" makes no fuckin' sense dummy, "most" qualifies the already qualified portion of the word 'stupid' -"est" already means "most"

That 4th grade Trump speak is for dummies just like you, no wonder you love him

That is the most stupidest thing I read all day paddy. It makes plenty of sense. You do realize that Politics 101 is to speak up above the other half. When half your audience can`t speak English well or at all,...throw prestige out the window and more ears will listen.

Stuck-up snob ...........
 
Last edited:

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
I asked you why a 91% income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans is bad because when we had it, the economy was good

The top marginal income tax rate has decreased since then, from 91% to 39%, shifting the burden of financing government expenditures onto the poor and middle-class

Ever since then, we've seen a steady decline in economic growth outside of financial bubbles because with such burdens, the poor and middle-class don't have enough money to finance a consumer economy. When poor people don't have money to spend, they don't spend money..

Avoid these facts all you want, with every absent substantive reply you strengthen my position
you typed a lot just to say "avoid these facts" you've avoided my things too. get bent, loser.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top