Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You have little idea of how intelligence works. Also so far they haven't been liked to Daesh or al-Qaeda. Jump to conclusions much?
You have little idea of how intelligence works. Also so far they haven't been liked to Daesh or al-Qaeda. Jump to conclusions much?
all muslims agree to sharia law in varying degrees. you dont consider shaira law extreme?Real Muslims aren't terrorists.
They bought the weapons they used in the attack legally 4 years ago and they were not on the no-fly list, one was an American citizen born in IllinoisThe Muslim terrorists had recent training in Saudi Arabia. How much you want to bet they were on the terrorist watch list? And if not, that is an even bigger fail.
No they don't, just like not all Christians agree with stoning homosexuals - as permitted by Deuteronomyall muslims agree to sharia law in varying degrees. you dont consider shaira law extreme?
Who ever mentioned ISIS? Jump to conclusions much? Maybe the FBI should start to focus on people who go over seas to become radicalizedThey bought the weapons they used in the attack legally 4 years ago and they were not on the no-fly list, one was an American citizen born in Illinois
So do you have some unannounced information the rest of us don't that ties this attack to ISIS?
The Muslim terrorists had recent training in Saudi Arabia. How much you want to bet they were on the FBI terrorist watch list? And if not, that is an even bigger fail.
If not ISIS, then who were you referring to? Boko Haram? What terrorist cell are they associated with?Who ever mentioned ISIS? Jump to conclusions much? Maybe the FBI should start to focus on people who go over seas to become radicalized
FBI agents discovered a huge arsenal of weapons and pipe bombs at a California home linked to Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik. Agents discovered nearly 5,000 rounds of ammunition, a dozen pipe bombs and hundreds of tools for making improvised explosive devices at the property, law enforcement officials revealed today
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3344350/Devout-Muslim-citizen-Saudi-wife-living-American-Dream-identified-heavily-armed-duo-burst-office-holiday-party-slaughtered-14-leaving-baby-mother.html
They didn't buy the guns. Someone else bought them and gave them to syed.They bought the weapons they used in the attack legally 4 years ago and they were not on the no-fly list, one was an American citizen born in Illinois
So do you have some unannounced information the rest of us don't that ties this attack to ISIS?
Many think men have developed sharia from gods word.all muslims agree to sharia law in varying degrees. you dont consider shaira law extreme?
If you're going to quote the Washington Post, at least give them credit...Between 2004 and 2014, suspected terrorists attempted to purchase guns from American dealers at least 2,233 times. And in 2,043 of those cases — 91 percent of the time — they succeeded.
They were legally bought was what I was getting atThey didn't buy the guns. Someone else bought them and gave them to syed.
Just to clarify.
Between 2004 and 2014, suspected terrorists attempted to purchase guns from American dealers at least 2,233 times. And in 2,043 of those cases — 91 percent of the time — they succeeded.
13% of mass shootings take place in "gun free zones", remember?If you're going to quote the Washington Post, at least give them credit...
I thought Obama's expansion of the Patriot Act was supposed to prevent these things. If your angle is gun control, it won't stop terrorism, only encourage it in more "gun free" zones.
If you're going to quote the Washington Post, at least give them credit...
I thought Obama's expansion of the Patriot Act was supposed to prevent these things. If your angle is gun control, it won't stop terrorism, only encourage it in more "gun free" zones.
Only 13%? Then am I to infer that 87% occur in areas that are NOT gun free zones?13% of mass shootings take place in "gun free zones", remember?
Places that don't allow guns aren't targetted because they don't allow guns
Who runs the background checks? The government. Another fail.Between 2004 and 2014, suspected terrorists attempted to purchase guns from American dealers at least 2,233 times. And in 2,043 of those cases — 91 percent of the time — they succeeded.
Then who should run them? You?Who runs the background checks? The government. Another fail.
They are more or less useless imo.Then who should run them? You?
Maybe, but you didn't answer the question.They are more or less useless imo.
You would be correct, sir;Only 13%? Then am I to infer that 87% occur in areas that are NOT gun free zones?