budlover13
King Tut
Nobody. They are useless.Maybe, but you didn't answer the question.
Nobody. They are useless.Maybe, but you didn't answer the question.
That just can't be true. With all of the pro gun rhetoric that is spewed in here, how is this possible? I am completely flabbergasted.You would be correct, sir;
"“Gun-free” Zones
Ninety-one of the 133 incidents (68%) took place wholly in private residences. Of the 37 incidents in public spaces, at least 21 took place wholly or in part where concealed guns could be lawfully carried. All told, no more than 17 of the shootings (13%) took place entirely in public spaces that were so-called “gun-free zones.”"
http://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/
So no background checks?Nobody. They are useless.
I'm pretty ok with that. There are people that shouldn't have guns imo. But our government has proven itself inept in enough areas that I don't believe they can reliably perform most any task. Except collecting taxes, fines, etc.So no background checks?
And open/concealed carry at will.So no background checks?
You're comfortable with literally anybody who wants one can buy a gun?I'm pretty ok with that. There are people that shouldn't have guns imo. But our government has proven itself inept in enough areas that I don't believe they can reliably perform most any task. Except collecting taxes, fines, etc.
Wow. Not sure that I could be a part of that.And open/concealed carry at will.
I find it interesting how you prefer everytownresearch (nobody has ever heard of), over the report from the CPRCYou would be correct, sir;
"“Gun-free” Zones
Ninety-one of the 133 incidents (68%) took place wholly in private residences. Of the 37 incidents in public spaces, at least 21 took place wholly or in part where concealed guns could be lawfully carried. All told, no more than 17 of the shootings (13%) took place entirely in public spaces that were so-called “gun-free zones.”"
http://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/
Show your work, cite your sourcesI find it interesting how you prefer everytownresearch (nobody has ever heard of), over the report from the CPRC
Everytown’s recent analysis of mass shootings is riddled with errors. Mistakes are made on the number
of mass shootings as well as the extent of mental illness, the killers’ ages, and even where the attacks
occurred. Those errors occurred because they did not do a complete news search on each case.
Pretty much. As long as I can have mine. It's a dog eat dog world out there.You're comfortable with literally anybody who wants one can buy a gun?
Not according to the CPRC. Which is a more credible source than your pathetic everytownreseachOnly 13%? Then am I to infer that 87% occur in areas that are NOT gun free zones?
The report is a .pdf fileShow your work, cite your sources
You're kidding me! The dude who wrote the book "More Guns Less Crime" disagrees with the verifiable fact that 13% of mass shootings took place in "gun-free zones"?Not according to the CPRC. Which is a more credible source than your pathetic everytownreseach
Everytown For Gun Safety is a far left group that is one year old. Co-Chairman Michael Bloomberg (former mayor of new york) is a long time activist against the second amendment,... and soft drinks over the size of 16 ounces. He eventually wants to ban guns, soda pop, and Rush LimbaughYou're kidding me! The dude who wrote the book "More Guns Less Crime" disagrees with the verifiable fact that 13% of mass shootings took place in "gun-free zones"?
Bud, for future reference, I will ask you for a citation of every single claim you make. You should just provide them at the end of your post so I can verify them myself instead of having to ask you to provide them every time.Everytown For Gun Safety is a far left group that is one year old. Co-Chairman Michael Bloomberg (former mayor of new york) is a long time activist against the second amendment,... and soft drinks over the size of 16 ounces. He eventually wants to ban guns, soda pop, and Rush Limbaugh
Don't get sassy with me sister. If a couple of liberal sissies can't handle the heat, then what would the kitchen look like?Bud, for future reference, I will ask you for a citation of every single claim you make. You should just provide them at the end of your post so I can verify them myself instead of having to ask you to provide them every time.
Padwan has a special kind of retardation that prevents his ability to google anything he disagrees with. You have to lead him to water, drown him in it and he will still deny it is wet.Don't get sassy with me sister. If a couple of liberal sissies can't handle the heat, then what would the kitchen look like?
That's pretty funny considering I'm the only one in this thread asking for people to provide sourcesPadwan has a special kind of retardation that prevents his ability to google anything he disagrees with. You have to lead him to water, drown him in it and he will still deny it is wet.