Uncle Ben
Well-Known Member
Said to have a name not unlike rotpoast aka 'pollie'.Anybody pick up any news on the 3rd suspect?
Last edited:
Said to have a name not unlike rotpoast aka 'pollie'.Anybody pick up any news on the 3rd suspect?
There's laws against shooting people and terrorism.What's the difference between the argument that gun control laws didn't prevent the attack in San Bernardino from happening, therefore, gun control laws don't work so we should get rid of them and the argument that homicide laws don't prevent homicide, but we should still keep it to prevent people from committing homicide?
Law's, very clearly are not ONLY to be meant as a deterrent, but also as a defined consequence for committing said crime. We don't make laws to prevent people from committing crimes, we make laws so that when people do commit those crimes, they're held accountable for them.
Can you explain how enacting stronger gun control legislation circumvents any constitutional amendments?There's laws against shooting people and terrorism.
Should we ban automobiles on the basis that they have the potential for abuse ?
I bet I could kill you quicker with a pickaxe, Ban Pickaxes 2015.
Once you start picking and choosing what constitutional rights to allow, you've undone the whole thing.
Those 4 magic words...Can you explain how enacting stronger gun control legislation circumvents any constitutional amendments?
Nobody is talking about banning anything, let alone for the reason of "because they have the potential for abuse". If that was the case, you'd see people supporting banning forks because hey, "there's a potential for abuse!". Sane people are talking about enacting regulations that make it harder for crazy fucks with a history of violence or religious extremists to obtain weapons - holy shit, such a revolutionary idea!
Conflating "stronger gun control regulations" with "BAN ALL GUNS!!!!!!" intellectually weakens your argument
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."Those 4 magic words...
"Shall not be infringed"
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
How is my right to "keep and bear Arms" infringed upon by enacting gun control legislation?
Infringed means breaching the contract - like I said before, you're totally welcome to keep and bear Arms - as the Constitution permits - so how does ensuring people with a history of mental illness or violence can't legally obtain firearms obstruct the 2nd amendment?
Nothing is being infringed, nothing is being breached
Do they not have the same inalienable rights?"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
How is my right to "keep and bear Arms" infringed upon by enacting gun control legislation?
Infringed means breaching the contract - like I said before, you're totally welcome to keep and bear Arms - as the Constitution permits - so how does ensuring people with a history of mental illness or violence can't legally obtain firearms obstruct the 2nd amendment?
Nothing is being infringed, nothing is being breached
There are also laws against poisoning people and strangling them, "should we ban ropes for their potential of abuse?"There's laws against shooting people and terrorism.
"Your rights end where mine begin"Do they not have the same inalienable rights?
Are they stopped from owning steak knives and SUVs too?"Your rights end where mine begin"
Absofuckinglutely not, crazy fucks with a history of violence do not have the same rights as me. They fucked up, so they deal with the consequences. What happened to people taking responsibility for their actions? Isn't that supposed to be one of the main tenets of conservatism?
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
How is my right to "keep and bear Arms" infringed upon by enacting gun control legislation?
Infringed means breaching the contract - like I said before, you're totally welcome to keep and bear Arms - as the Constitution permits - so how does ensuring people with a history of mental illness or violence can't legally obtain firearms obstruct the 2nd amendment?
Nothing is being infringed, nothing is being breached
Are they stopped from owning steak knives and SUVs too?
Killers gonna kill...The chances of someone killing a theater with a steak knife or SUV are not very good at all. I stand a very good chance against someone with a steak knife or SUV.
Killers gonna kill...
The tool they use is whatever is at hand, at least if a citizen is confronted by a nut and can defend themselves it's better than having a situation like a few days ago where a nut job with a knife was able to get a tube station closed in London cos noone could defend themselves.
One guy got stabbed in the neck.
You're missing the point, as usual.The hand gun allows you to creep and stalk, then shoot at distance. Waiting for the chance to use a knife or SUV is not the same as waiting to use your gun.
Infidels."Bombs left at a Southern California social services facility by the gun-wielding radical Muslim couple who killed 14 and wounded 21 were set to go off when first responders arrived, a vicious strategy often seen in the Middle East. "
Obama is still convinced that this was workplace violence. I think he is the only one...
Double InfidelsISIS doesn't like it when you call them Daeshbags. Or douchebags. Check out the hash tag on twitter
That kneeling retard has a nice rack.
It is gay to motorboat a fat man?That kneeling retard has a nice rack.