ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Climate change another frank luntz term
Look it up. He invented the term because global warming sounded too scary.
And you stupid fucktards lap it up
Seriously Google climate change Frank luntz
Donald Trump
- Thread starter MrStickyScissors
- Start date
- Status
Look it up. He invented the term because global warming sounded too scary.
And you stupid fucktards lap it up
Seriously Google climate change Frank luntz
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
It is probably mostly red boxers. If you look closely you see a smaaaaall streak of pink.
Haha, funny Chesus --- That's the best you got?
Seriously, as Hildog would say, "what difference does it make"?.
Call it what you want, how does that explain the nutty professor's delusional outlook on the world?
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Is that buck`s ?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
The phrase "global warming" should be abandoned in favour of "climate change", Mr Luntz says, and the party should describe its policies as "conservationist" instead of "environmentalist", because "most people" think environmentalists are "extremists" who indulge in "some pretty bizarre behaviour... that turns off many voters
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/mar/04/usnews.climatechange
You really are one of the dumbest posters here. You lap up Republican crap like a shit eating dog
Chesusie, you goofball, you gotta up your game. Apparently the magic man thinks Luntz is correct.
You should google your messiah's name along with climate change ----
Btw, none of this diversionary crap explains your nutty professor's delusional world. But you carry on, he needs the gullible .
awhaha
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
What's with your hard-on for Obama and Climate Change tonight? Spreading the same bullshit all over the boards. You pissed the Paris meeting was a success and the leading party of the country is moving us forward in the right direction in regards to climate change regardless of the GOPs kicking and screaming not to?
Well, maybe when you guys get your act together, Americans will vote your representative into office and we can take it from there... But from where I sit, running a retard like Trump or Cruz (leading GOP contenders) won't cut it. So, to the back of the bus you go. Pipe down back there now, ya hear!?
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Who`s he gonna write the check to ?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
R&D for renewable energy just like we subsidize oil & gas - something every American should support
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
There`s that R&D thing again. Non refundable payment too, like most. Somebody has to tell the Democrats that when W talked to god,...He didn`t mean the Sun is more dangerous than ISIS, he meant the Son is more dangerous than ISIS. It`ll make sense to them after.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Did Obama happen to mention How we would convince the world to comply ? That`s the thing you do after the expensive R&D.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
With force like we always do
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Basic R&D needs to be done by Govt and then can be expanded upon by the private sector, this is shown to be historically true with the Space Programme being one of the most obvious.
Most if not all of our technological advancements in the last 50 years were due to the basic research done by Govts trying to be the first ones in space.
I'm not saying we wouldn't have the stuff we have now eventually, but we most definately wouldn't have it yet.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
In todays cases it dictates who gets to do the job. the bidding happens but the contractor is already set. If you know the causes of climate change, you don`t need to research much at all, you need to stop the causes.
The US Navy suffered dearly because of R&D related intel. R&D was expected to cost X, when it was calculated to a 500 million dollar Destroyer called the Zumwalt Class. Experts sold Congress on many technology ideas and new systems. Turned a 500 million at cost ship to 2.5 billion with the assurance that the next would be cheaper and the next cheaper than that one because 32 of them were to be ordered. They escort LCD and troops going ashore in battle, escort fleet ships and can break away and fight independently shore bombardment.
They spent overwhelmingly huge amounts of cash on R&D for a hull that I sank dead with a MBT on the beach. A designer of it was bragging on a site and wanting to know why me and several Navy Ranks were discussing it and it`s flaws and why he thought it was compatible and more effective than a Burke Class.
Long story short, the R&D was done regardless of the major flaws like 2" thick hull, 45 or so crew, and inability to mix electricity with seawater safely. Those Brass were on the verge of acting and went straight to it when I chased that designer away after he gave a strategy and lost all three to my MBT on the beach, if they got that one, there were thirty left to take over,...a main Battle Tank should never be able to chase a combat direct fire gunship back over the horizon and keep it there or sink it.
R&D for Climate Change will do the same, supply a hole to throw money into, and all of Congress has invested in stocks for companies that magically win Contracts.
Obama`s last money grab is all it is. We already know how to stop air pollution and it should be done first before funding fuel substitute studies.
If I knew they were spending large sums on a failure, they did too, and that`s my whole point, this will happen with Climate Change now.
The Skipper of the Burke knew better than to come over the horizon with a howitzer on the beach.
They Skipper of the CAG and DDG, didn`t care about howitzers and the BB skipper challenged all thirty tanks at point blank range, laughing.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Look online, you`ll find the Zumwalt orders went from 32 to 20 to 3. one is now complete and is being advertised as the deadliest ship on the seas today on news sites. I know better. So why are the reporting that ? to justify what they done.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
There are national academies of science in nearly every nation on the planet whose purpose is to do primary research.
A process/science is considered mature when predictions can be made with accuracy and precision. That is not the current state of the art when it comes to climate change. To arrogantly base economic policy on a immature science runs the risk of harming those that can least afford the fiscal disruption in their lives. But regardless, politicians have bought into the narrative for well, political reasons and future personal payoffs. It's sold as a human investment. As always, it's about the greater good of those at the top who will eventually capitalize and are immune to the fiscal development cost.
The gullible never realize these things until it's too late.
The gullible never realize these things until it's too late.
- Status