CO2 Queztion???

[warren kirk]

you are a donkey, you won't read and learn and accept FACTS. Keep living in denial jackass. I tried to teach you something.

Why don't u do experiment, then U want sound like an Donkey! I'll show U what CO2 does Donkey but, when my box comes on. I'm going put U on UR ass. I Told U experiments wait till after 5 my time. Pictures speak louder than words. Now that's a FACT! RIGHT DONKEY, u threw the first word! Just wait!

 

[hotrodharley]

“For each carbon dioxide molecule that is incorporated into plants through photosynthesis, plants lose about 200 hundred molecules of water through their stomata,” explains Julian Schroeder, a professor of biology who headed the research effort. “Because elevated CO2 reduces the density of stomatal pores in leaves, this is, at first sight beneficial for plants as they would lose less water. However, the reduction in the numbers of stomatal pores decreases the ability of plants to cool their leaves during a heat wave via water evaporation. Less evaporation adds to heat stress in plants, which ultimately affects crop yield.”

http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/discovery_provides_insights_on_how_plants_respond_to_elevated_co2_levels

 

[harris hawk]

co2 level 1500 ppm

 

[warren kirk]

“For each carbon dioxide molecule that is incorporated into plants through photosynthesis, plants lose about 200 hundred molecules of water through their stomata,” explains Julian Schroeder, a professor of biology who headed the research effort. “Because elevated CO2 reduces the density of stomatal pores in leaves, this is, at first sight beneficial for plants as they would lose less water. However, the reduction in the numbers of stomatal pores decreases the ability of plants to cool their leaves during a heat wave via water evaporation. Less evaporation adds to heat stress in plants, which ultimately affects crop yield.”

http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/discovery_provides_insights_on_how_plants_respond_to_elevated_co2_levels

It regulates for high heat so plants can grow. That's I've been saying. WTF

 

[hotrodharley]

you should read it and try and UNDERSTAND it. cause you obviously don't

"Because elevated CO2 reduces the density of stomatal pores in leaves, this is, at first sight beneficial for plants as they would lose less water. However,"

There is the clue for the educated reader. You are correct. The link is there for all to read.UC- Davis is an excellent source for growing anything.

 

[hotrodharley]

Not arguing warren's plants look good or not. I would like to see pics.

 

[chuck estevez]

Because looking good will tell you if the can of yeast is doing a damn thing,lol

 

[a mongo frog]

Listen. Here asshole, yeast home-made co2, works, quit being so close minded. Oh, ur the know it all, I get it. Sad.

Dude stop. Stop being rude to everyone. All you have to do is post your co2 levels so everyone can see them, via your controller or a syringe test kit picture.

 

[chuck estevez]

if you want to learn something watch this video on REAL grow room design. show me where a yeast bottle comes in

 

[chuck estevez]

but i know you won't watch it, you'll just make another stupid comment

 

[warren kirk]

if you want to learn something watch this video on REAL grow room design. show me where a yeast bottle comes in

Like said, experience, is fact, get over it.

 

[chuck estevez]

thanks for proving my point.Donkey

 

[warren kirk]

but i know you won't watch it, you'll just make another stupid comment

I've watched it, and. So ur setup is Gospel. No other thing works, even chemistry is not fact. That what ur saying.

 

[chuck estevez]

I've watched it, and. So ur setup is Gospel. No other thing works, even chemistry is not fact. That what ur saying.

no, what I am saying is UNLESS you keep a constant PPM of co2 and match your temp and humidity in a sealed environment, you are just wasting your time. and to do that, you need the proper equipment.

 

[warren kirk]

no, what I am saying is UNLESS you keep a constant PPM of co2 and match your temp and humidity in a sealed environment, you are just wasting your time. and to do that, you need the proper equipment.

What make U think I don't!

 

[chuck estevez]

OMG,LMFAO, you just burned yourself

 

[warren kirk]

OMG,LMFAO, you just burned yourself

Yep, I'm on FIRE. If u want 2 lean something instead of flapping ur gums, go ahead an ask the Forum, How many people use home made co2 an Works. Try ur fate. If u have the balls. If u do, witch not. Then u will know it works! Go head, ask see what u get. Then U can give apology. Scared.

 

[bravedave]

So u say, If not hot enough heat CO2 want work, Dude plants use all threw grow, Except NIGHT! So on the outside grow, Lol, plant don't use CO2, because there not hit enough outside. PLEASE.

My grow room is built in an unheated pole barn. It is not technichally a sealed room, but every seam is caulked inside and out...So, unless I create air flow via my exhaust running and pulling fresh air in via my 6" intake, there is close to zero air exchange.
I was worried about the tradeoff between pumping freezing air in and having enough CO2. After tapping the smart guys (and gals) around here, I went with no exhausting at all during veg, or at lights out during flower. When lights were on during flower, I ran the exhaust 4 times for 15 minutes over the 12 hours.
So the only CO2 my plants got was when I opened the door during veg and when I opened the door or during the limited exhausting during flower and guess what??? My plants stayed green and my goal of increasing yields every grow was met.
Bottom line, I concluded that adding CO2 to an unsealed room would be a waste of time and unecessary as the need is actually small and fufilled pretty much by opening the door.

 

[warren kirk]

My grow room is built in an unheated pole barn. It is not technichally a sealed room, but every seam is caulked inside and out...So, unless I create air flow via my exhaust running and pulling fresh air in via my 6" intake, there is close to zero air exchange.
I was worried about the tradeoff between pumping freezing air in and having enough CO2. After tapping the smart guys (and gals) around here, I went with no exhausting at all during veg, or at lights out during flower. When lights were on during flower, I ran the exhaust 4 times for 15 minutes over the 12 hours.
So the only CO2 my plants got was when I opened the door during veg and when I opened the door or during the limited exhausting during flower and guess what??? My plants stayed green and my goal of increasing yields every grow was met.
Bottom line, I concluded that adding CO2 to an unsealed room would be a waste of time and unecessary as the need is actually small and fufilled pretty much by opening the door.

U got it. My grow is sealed, green dense buds. U can even sit in ur grow an Breath co2.

 

[warren kirk]

I already know there is a bunch of idiots like you on this site, But i bet the REAL growers would agree with me, so YOU go ahead and start a thread, you already look stupid, so you got nothing to lose.

Yep U scared, I don't have to prove. U do, u said ur set up right, mine wrong, burden of proof is on U. Bamb.