Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Wait, I can't recall. Which political office did Carville run for? Oh right, he's a consultant for politicians. So, this is meaningful how?
Wait, I can't recall. Which political office did Carville run for? Oh right, he's a consultant for politicians. So, this is meaningful how?
Not really talking about you, why does this have to be about you?. I'm refuting your endless postings with the mindless and factually incorrect trope about liberals. Its backasswards dude. Many more right wingers (not conservative, they aren't conserving anything) receive federal assistance than liberals. Also many more liberals have better education than right wingers.First, you make the classic mistake of thinking republicans are Conservative, most aren't, which is why I'm not a republican.
Second, I will happily compare IQ's and financial success with virtually any lib on this forum. There may be one or two doing better, but I doubt it.
You might want to take a look at the democrat base, they make the republican base look like rocket scientists.
Tomato, potato. You were mocking the poor for voting a Republican. They don't. Now you're saying some county in Mississippi with 8,000 relatively poor individuals sucks up more aid per capita than, say, Cook County (Chicago). That's true, and totally irrelevant.95 of 100 poorest counties in the country are in red States- fact
9 out of the ten poorest states in the country are red- fact ...THEY PAY LESS IN TAXES THAN WHAT THEY RECEIVED- fact
I've fucked a few republicans, never fucked a flag though. Seems kind of weird but whatever. The girls that were democrats were more fun.Fuck democrats Fuck Republicans Fuck all flags.....oh sorry wrong thread...
"ignorance is bliss"I've fucked a few republicans, never fucked a flag though. Seems kind of weird but whatever. The girls that were democrats were more fun.
Tomato, potato. You were mocking the poor for voting a Republican. They don't. Now you're saying some county in Mississippi with 8,000 relatively poor individuals sucks up more aid per capita than, say, Cook County (Chicago). That's true, and totally irrelevant.
If you stop massaging your statistics you'll see that the majority of aid, in absolute terms, not per capita, goes to Blue cities. How could it not? That's where the majority of poor live. There's nothing wrong with that. Cities have rich folk to offset their poor. Rural areas don't.
I'm mocking some RIU resident conservatives for their ignorance regarding who collects aid and are ignorant. This trope about those on assistance being liberal and dumb is not entirely wrong, no political group has the monopoly on dumb and lazy. They selectively forget the fact that most red states accept more federal aid dollars than they return in taxes. Blue states by and large do the opposite. Also, those that self identify as republican are in general less well educated than those that identify themselves as democrats.Tomato, potato. You were mocking the poor for voting a Republican. They don't. Now you're saying some county in Mississippi with 8,000 relatively poor individuals sucks up more aid per capita than, say, Cook County (Chicago). That's true, and totally irrelevant.
If you stop massaging your statistics you'll see that the majority of aid, in absolute terms, not per capita, goes to Blue cities. How could it not? That's where the majority of poor live. There's nothing wrong with that. Cities have rich folk to offset their poor. Rural areas don't.
So, do you go out on a date with that flag or do you just treat it as a whore?"ignorance is bliss"
-somebody-
Read my post again - 9 of the ten poorest states are red... They are taking more than they pay from the government.. Isn't that your guys thing? Taking? @spandy
Did I take something? Do tell.
Cost of living from one state to the next isn't considered.
How many of those red states have democratic governors?
It only accounts for those that voted. What of the non-voters, who statistically would be more likely to receive benefits. We just dont talk about them or something?
How old is that data again? Are all the red/blue states then still red/blue states now?
Not really talking about you, why does this have to be about you?. I'm refuting your endless postings with the mindless and factually incorrect trope about liberals. Its backasswards dude. Many more right wingers (not conservative, they aren't conserving anything) receive federal assistance than liberals. Also many more liberals have better education than right wingers.
Read my post again - 9 of the ten poorest states are red... They are taking more than they pay from the government.. Isn't that your guys thing? Taking? @spandy
How about this: "If a state is red, the poor probably didn't vote." There, I fixed it for you. I spoon fed you the damn research and you still cling to this trope you've got in your head that the poor are voting Republican. If they vote, they vote Democrat by a large margin. Fact.If the state is red and it is on the top ten poorest..it is poor people voting Republican. There are nine out of the top ten are poor shit kicking hillbillies voting republican and taking more than what they pay..that is just a fact, it can not be debated.
The way you get poor uneducated shitkickers to continue to vote like that is mislead them..you quote scripture and scare em with gay marriage and Isis.
"God is dead"So, do you go out on a date with that flag or do you just treat it as a whore?
Politics are fun to argue....what "color" is the state with the lowest high school graduation rate?
Which party candidate for Kentucky governor, backed MMJ?
Welfare is when the government gives money to support someone. What you are talking about is tax breaks.Not self hatred, easily manipulated and misled.
I still haven't seen one righty here admit that corporate welfare and agricultural welfare even exist.. They are too brainwashed and cry and moan about a single mom with a job getting wic.