Verbal Diarrhea live

Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Corso312 said:
Everyone I talked to loved it year one..but the young people didn't sign up, so many of the doctors fled. If the young n healthy sign up it will work much better.
Click to expand...
So if more people pay into it it who don't draw anything out, it will work better? Durrrr
 
Corso312

Corso312

Well-Known Member
Yeah dummy, that's how it was designed.. The young and healthy pay in and use less than the older people who use more than what they are paying. Its a cycle.
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
The ACA is sorta like SS (FICA) we all been paying into FICA since we started as young teenagers and got your working papers (does that shit even exist anymore?), yet you don't reap the rewards until 5 decades later...if you're still around that is. Yet you can't bow out of paying that.

But the difference is that no matter what, you can use the ACA anytime that you pay into it.

B4L
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Corso312 said:
Agreed.. Obama wanted that, the ACA was like consolation prize.
Click to expand...
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
The ACA is sorta like SS (FICA) we all been paying into FICA since we started as young teenagers and got your working papers (does that shit even exist anymore?), yet you don't reap the rewards until 5 decades later...if you're still around that is. Yet you can't bow out of paying that.

But the difference is that no matter what, you can use the ACA anytime that you pay into it.

B4L
Click to expand...
You are fundamentally incorrect. The SS (FICA) system was where you had an INDIVIDUAL account that you paid into. Benefits are based solely on what you put into the system.

ACA is socialized medicine where the more wealthy are expected to pay higher premiums to subsidize lower income people. It is not a 1-1 basis and it is redistribution of wealth through social programming.

The only thing about them that is the same is you have absolutely no choice whether to pay or not.
 
Blunted 4 lyfe

Blunted 4 lyfe

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
You are fundamentally incorrect. The SS (FICA) system was where you had an INDIVIDUAL account that you paid into. Benefits are based solely on what you put into the system.

ACA is socialized medicine where the more wealthy are expected to pay higher premiums to subsidize lower income people. It is not a 1-1 basis and it is redistribution of wealth through social programming.

The only thing about them that is the same is you have absolutely no choice whether to pay or not.
Click to expand...
Hence the term "sorta" there are similarities in both, yes you do pay into individual accounts in fica but at the end of the day they're both socialist programs to help PEOPLE.

SS was tweaked many times to get it right yet the folks on the right refuse to help tweak the ACA because a black man stole away the idea from a right wing think tank.

And please don't give me the "redistribution of wealth" garbage, the righties never have a problem redistributing the wealth of the 99%ers to the 1%ers in the form of tax breaks, it wasn't that long ago that we finally got out of Bushs' tax cuts to the 1%ers, because you know, they create jobs, which is a lot of BS because it's the 99%ers who create the jobs. We have created 74 months of private sector jobs not the 1%ers. We are the ones who spend our cash and drive the economy and create more jobs, the 1%ers hoard the money or offshore that shit, us 99%ers don't know shit about offshoring or hoarding our wealth, we spend the shit.

BTW wasn't it the righties who always bitched about creating private sector jobs?

B4L
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
Hence the term "sorta" there are similarities in both, yes you do pay into individual accounts in fica but at the end of the day they're both socialist programs to help PEOPLE.

SS was tweaked many times to get it right yet the folks on the right refuse to help tweak the ACA because a black man stole away the idea from a right wing think tank.

And please don't give me the "redistribution of wealth" garbage, the righties never have a problem redistributing the wealth of the 99%ers to the 1%ers in the form of tax breaks, it wasn't that long ago that we finally got out of Bushs' tax cuts to the 1%ers, because you know, they create jobs, which is a lot of BS because it's the 99%ers who create the jobs. We have created 74 months of private sector jobs not the 1%ers. We are the ones who spend our cash and drive the economy and create more jobs, the 1%ers hoard the money or offshore that shit, us 99%ers don't know shit about offshoring or hoarding our wealth, we spend the shit.

BTW wasn't it the righties who always bitched about creating private sector jobs?

B4L
Click to expand...
Tax breaks do not redistribute wealth they keep it in the hands of those who made it...

I dont care which side bitched about anything, I am not on either side anymore. I figured out the game they were playing.

By the way, it is politicians that hand out tax breaks. Be mad at them...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top