the truest words ever spoken in american politics

are you upset?

  • yes

    Votes: 3 60.0%

  • yes

    Votes: 4 80.0%
  • Total voters
    5
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Because I'm glad we have laws against statutory rape, you feel I'm experiencing Stockholm Syndrome. I guess you wish we didn't have laws against statutory rape. Why do you continue to defend pedophiles and object to laws against pedophiles ?
Click to expand...
I'm no longer interested in addressing your pedo questions, but will address issues of consent in a generic way. Sorry to disappoint you.

I view legal statutes as arbitrary, because they are. Sometimes a statute will coincide with a good thing, but many times they don't and rather than protecting a person, they often deprive people of self ownership / determination.

For instance, it used to be legal to own other people 100%. Now, people are under the illusion that because that kind of slavery doesn't exist anymore in the USA that they are free, but that's not the case. The only thing that has occurred is the severity of peoples enslavement has lessened in some situations, but that doesn't mean people are free.

Perhaps you've heard that there are people in prison for the crime of acting like they own themselves?

Obviously if a person HAS the wherewithal to consent to something and that something doesn't create a harm to another person, a law which limits that persons ability to self determine isn't a law which protects, rather it is a law which offends.

Who owns you ? Do you think you do?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm no longer interested in addressing your pedo questions, but will address issues of consent in a generic way. Sorry to disappoint you.

I view legal statutes as arbitrary, because they are. Sometimes a statute will coincide with a good thing, but many times they don't and rather than protecting a person, they often deprive people of self ownership / determination.

For instance, it used to be legal to own other people 100%. Now, people are under the illusion that because that kind of slavery doesn't exist anymore in the USA that they are free, but that's not the case. The only thing that has occurred is the severity of peoples enslavement has lessened in some situations, but that doesn't mean people are free.

Perhaps you've heard that there are people in prison for the crime of acting like they own themselves?

Obviously if a person HAS the wherewithal to consent to something and that something doesn't create a harm to another person, a law which limits that persons ability to self determine isn't a law which protects, rather it is a law which offends.

Who owns you ? Do you think you do?
Click to expand...
TLDR....stop with the bullshit words. Getting old
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
its not the length of the words. Its the spin you try as a wordsmith. Why take the time to read someones logic trying to justify sex with minors. Like I said it gets old.
Click to expand...
I'm not trying to justify anything but the idea that people own themselves, but they don't own other people. Your argument runs opposite of that.

You favor laws which prohibit a person with the wherewithal to run their own life, FROM running their own life. You will not address that point, because you can't rebut it.

Yes, it gets old. Have a good evening, slave.
 
Moses Mobetta

Moses Mobetta

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm no longer interested in addressing your pedo questions, but will address issues of consent in a generic way. Sorry to disappoint you.

I view legal statutes as arbitrary, because they are. Sometimes a statute will coincide with a good thing, but many times they don't and rather than protecting a person, they often deprive people of self ownership / determination.

For instance, it used to be legal to own other people 100%. Now, people are under the illusion that because that kind of slavery doesn't exist anymore in the USA that they are free, but that's not the case. The only thing that has occurred is the severity of peoples enslavement has lessened in some situations, but that doesn't mean people are free.

Perhaps you've heard that there are people in prison for the crime of acting like they own themselves?

Obviously if a person HAS the wherewithal to consent to something and that something doesn't create a harm to another person, a law which limits that persons ability to self determine isn't a law which protects, rather it is a law which offends.

Who owns you ? Do you think you do?
Click to expand...
A lot of truth in there, plenty in prison today for smoking pot here in the usa
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm not trying to justify anything but the idea that people own themselves, but they don't own other people. Your argument runs opposite of that.

You favor laws which prohibit a person with the wherewithal to run their own life, FROM running their own life. You will not address that point, because you can't rebut it.

Yes, it gets old. Have a good evening, slave.
Click to expand...
Yeah you let me know when you ready to post that social security number the government gave you. I bet you still use it to this day. See you in the field slave
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Did you mean to prevent that interaction sir ?
Click to expand...
The prevention of the crime is not the law, the act of doing, in itself is the violation of the law. With the exception of "conspiracy" laws, which I think are silly as fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top