UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
notice how your source says "quotas" and not quotas?Really! looks like you're about as intelligent as you think everyone else is.
I don't usually communicate with people who have a total lack of decorum, such as yourself, but I'm only going to reply to show how much of a liar you are, or ignorant, you can pick which it is. You really seem to be the one no one likes, and I can see why.
The Bakke case in 1978 outlawed quotas. So there were indeed quotas in my lifetime.
"In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (197, the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances. The case involved the admissions practices of the Medical School of the University of California at Davis. The medical school reserved 16 out of 100 seats in its entering class for minorities, including "Blacks," "Chicanos," "Asians," and "American Indians."
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_regents.html
I'm curious to see what your next move will be. To discredit PBS (yes the Public Broadcast System) as a bastion of white supremacy and right wing propaganda?
Or to try to redefine the use of the term quota. I'm curious what your meaning for the term quota is if reserving a specific number of seats for a particular class doesn't meet the meaning of that term in your eyes?
If you're going to say that I implied that quotas were in use for decades that simply isn't the case. I just know that indeed they were at one point used. It took the high court until very recently to strike down point based systems where minorities were given a lot of points for not being white. I'm actually fine with extra points, but they're illegal now too.
*drops mic*
that's your first hint, you sock puppet retard.
