DIY design build throwdown

HydroRed

Well-Known Member
I still think the temperature based dimming circuit is a good idea and not redundant.

What if the fans quit and the COBs are still running?

What if temps around your passive setup spiked for any of a thousand reasons?

It's cheap insurance.
This exactly. But the use of it as a fail safe "shutoff" rather than a temp contoled dimmer unit is a great idea & im sure would help some diy'ers sleep a little better at night.
 

SSGrower

Well-Known Member
Alright, so staying in line with the whole managing of a microclimate and as @PurpleBuz wishes for us to use our brains.......



Rabbits hole here I come.....

Sunrise and Sunset by automated control via systems similar to those available from Titan are for certain the route to go in a professional, commercial, production oriented setting, which if I have not made clear by now is nowhere near here (see above reference to rabbits hole)

PWM pulses a signal in the millisecond or less frequency range, this signal then is used to "switch on and off" so fewer photons are generated vs. a straight reduction in current supplied to the cob which will still dim but as I understand can shift the color some.

It is certainly possible Titan or others have this very device but here is the kicker I desire to make it something that goes on the driver(s) I have (wtf you expect me to do with them throw them away?) that will automatically gradually increase either current or change the pulse to allow a gradual increase of light when the unit is first powered then when the light shuts off for the night a gradual decrease in current or change of pulse will dim it down. Since there is such little current draw (comparative to hps or mh) even if just one cob was set up this way temporarily driven by a ups of sorts would it atleast do a fair job of the simulation?



/...... Coming back out of the hole.....
 

fjbudboy

Well-Known Member
The forward facing set up of the PCB under those diffusers is used much more efficiently if you take them off. Me and @BOBBY_G can both attest.
I have those same type bulbs. Ime the diffuser was gel coated glass and the pcb radial. Not trying to say you are wrong as my floodlight type bulbs were as you say and most other could be that way as well.

ok, and doing it by dimming the cob? I can see that. What consideration have you made for pwm vs current control for dimming?
I was thinking about this temp vs dimming pwm idea the other day myself. Using a raspberry pi with a temp probe to control pwm seems like you could do all sorts of stuff. Things like soft start, temp dimming, timer and ?. I dunno how though, but I'm pretty sure its possible.
 

SSGrower

Well-Known Member
I have those same type bulbs. Ime the diffuser was gel coated glass and the pcb radial. Not trying to say you are wrong as my floodlight type bulbs were as you say and most other could be that way as well.



I was thinking about this temp vs dimming pwm idea the other day myself. Using a raspberry pi with a temp probe to control pwm seems like you could do all sorts of stuff. Things like soft start, temp dimming, timer and ?. I dunno how though, but I'm pretty sure its possible.
not knowing jack about arduinos or raspberry pi id say I think its proven they can but I know the raspberry pi cant handle an abrupt shutdown without risk of corrupting the OS
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I have those same type bulbs. Ime the diffuser was gel coated glass and the pcb radial. Not trying to say you are wrong as my floodlight type bulbs were as you say and most other could be that way as well.



I was thinking about this temp vs dimming pwm idea the other day myself. Using a raspberry pi with a temp probe to control pwm seems like you could do all sorts of stuff. Things like soft start, temp dimming, timer and ?. I dunno how though, but I'm pretty sure its possible.
Yes it could be done, without a doubt.

I think it can also be done with the dimming leads, a thermal sensor and a few other parts at minimal expense. No need to over complicate a thermal dimming circuit.
 

Abiqua

Well-Known Member
PWM color shift in some white led's is less than 3 steps of the MacAdam elipse...look at my post in the end of that thread...the color shift would be imperceptible to the naked eye....and dimming does NOT seem to create a color shift outside of the datasheet specs and maybe even less...both imperceptible to the naked eye. Now mono colors might have some shift .......green [iridium]......... red [Tj heat]....:peace:

Pwm is just pulsed light so quick that the human eye just thinks it is dimmer, but to the plant it may/may not be different...
 

SSGrower

Well-Known Member
PWM color shift in some white led's is less than 3 steps of the MacAdam elipse...look at my post in the end of that thread...the color shift would be imperceptible to the naked eye....and dimming does NOT seem to create a color shift outside of the datasheet specs and maybe even less...both imperceptible to the naked eye. Now mono colors might have some shift .......green [iridium]......... red [Tj heat]....:peace:

Pwm is just pulsed light so quick that the human eye just thinks it is dimmer, but to the plant it may/may not be different...
I gotta think if I were living under a strobe light I'd be even more special...:eyesmoke:

I though 1 step on the McAdams was what is humanly perceptible. Much more info for me to absorb on this aspect, as seems more and more things in life
 

SSGrower

Well-Known Member
Not to get sidetracked on color shift as i consider it would be easily compensated for or even negligible as it seems 4 step led bining is common, Chuck out the change for tighter tolerance and as with higher cri I not convinced of the value.
 

BOBBY_G

Well-Known Member
admittedly out of the loop on the current state of this thread, but is dimming even worth it considering the following:

-trend is to increase number of cobs and run them softer
-that results in less heat, in some cases so much less that its taking the plants out of the ideal temp range
-any array of N cobs can be dimmed in increments of 1/N by simple switching using cheapo temperature switches
 

Airwalker16

Well-Known Member
Not to get sidetracked on color shift as i consider it would be easily compensated for or even negligible as it seems 4 step led bining is common, Chuck out the change for tighter tolerance and as with higher cri I not convinced of the value.
What is this 1 step, 2 step, 3 step, 4 step, 5 step binning I see on Cree's website? It seems that the only difference is the Letter in the part # at the end? What is it exactly?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
admittedly out of the loop on the current state of this thread, but is dimming even worth it considering the following:

-trend is to increase number of cobs and run them softer
-that results in less heat, in some cases so much less that its taking the plants out of the ideal temp range
-any array of N cobs can be dimmed in increments of 1/N by simple switching using cheapo temperature switches
Please elaborate?
 

BOBBY_G

Well-Known Member
in order of those above

1. obvious fact
2. is heat really so much of a problem that we need to overthink it (i.e controlling it via dimming?)
3. when i say switch off 1/N of the cobs, probably 1/N of the drivers would be more appropriate (well easier, at least)

lets say you have a space of 8 bars with 6 cobs each, each bar on its own 200W driver. at appropriate distance to canopy so that light is relatively uniform (no lenses)

at 85 degrees one of the drivers kicks off with a simple thermostatic switch, and you 'dimmed' from 1600W to 1400W

at 87 degrees you drop another driver and youre at 1200W, etc

as an extension of this build a simple circuit on a B version of the meanwell that uses a few fixed resistors in parallel, some of the relays are triggered by relays to change from 100% to 70% current.

the 'logic' in this case could be as simple as a cheap bimetal wall thermostat
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
in order of those above

1. obvious fact
2. is heat really so much of a problem that we need to overthink it (i.e controlling it via dimming?)
3. when i say switch off 1/N of the cobs, probably 1/N of the drivers would be more appropriate (well easier, at least)

lets say you have a space of 8 bars with 6 cobs each, each bar on its own 200W driver. at appropriate distance to canopy so that light is relatively uniform (no lenses)

at 85 degrees one of the drivers kicks off with a simple thermostatic switch, and you 'dimmed' from 1600W to 1400W

at 87 degrees you drop another driver and youre at 1200W, etc

as an extension of this build a simple circuit on a B version of the meanwell that uses a few fixed resistors in parallel, some of the relays are triggered by relays to change from 100% to 70% current.

the 'logic' in this case could be as simple as a cheap bimetal wall thermostat
I think we're talking about two different overheating situations. I'm being very specific about my desire to control excessive heat buildup in the fixture, at the COB itself, with the aim of protecting the equipment from overheating itself.

This can be the result of various causes, including the space overheating, but I'm looking for a way to control or eliminate the heat generated by the fixture by dimming it or shutting it down as needed, preferably automatically, without the need for a logic circuit.

Therefore, shutting down a chip at a time isn't a viable solution if they're all overheating; the ones left on will continue to overheat.

Dealing with overheating in a space is old hat; there are any number of thermal protection devices for spaces already on the market, just look up 'Chernobyl switch'. They work by being on a trigger cord and using a thermostat, shutting down the trigger cord if temps exceed a given limit.
 
Top