Are you one who feels the bern really bad?

[ttystikk]

Just one?
It's the most obvious, but the fact that she is not republican

DINO; Democrat In Name Only.

Her policies are republican, her track record is republican, the same republicans are pouring huge 'contributions'- read, multimillion dollar bribes by corporations- into her campaign.

What about that isn't republican, other than a name?

And why do you cling to the notion that she will give any more fucks about average citizens here than she did about them anywhere else when she was SecState?

Don't be suckered by the label.

 

[schuylaar]

Good idea, I'll probably do that instead

He is on the ballot as Bernie Sanders.

 

[UncleBuck]

Her policies are republican, her track record is republican

and bernie votes with her 90% of the time.

so you are rooting for a 90% republican.

 

[ttystikk]

and bernie votes with her 90% of the time.

so you are rooting for a 90% republican.

Since there's no one with a lower republican quotient, that's the guy we're stuck with if we want anything besides more of the same.

Better than 99% like Shillary.

 

[BustinScales510]

Since there's no one with a lower republican quotient, that's the guy we're stuck with if we want anything besides more of the same.

Better than 99% like Shillary.

So lesser of two evils is ok when deciding between democrats in the primary, but not between the democrat and republican in the general?

 

[ChesusRice]

I wonder when the GOP will start funding Sanders 3rd party run?

 

[ttystikk]

He is on the ballot as Bernie Sanders.

Are you certain about that? You've been wrong one or twice before, and his given name is Bernard Sanders.

This is exactly the kind of shit the establishment will pounce on to get its way over the will of the People.

 

[ttystikk]

So lesser of two evils is ok when deciding between democrats in the primary, but not between the democrat and republican in the general?

You mischaracterized my statement completely.

I'm FOR Mr Sanders, I think his position in the political landscape is perfectly acceptable.

Funny how you didn't mention how often Mrs Clinton's policies match with those of republicans.

 

[ttystikk]

I wonder when the GOP will start funding Sanders 3rd party run?

Lol that would be the dumbest mistake they ever made, in a long line of increasingly boneheaded moves.

 

[BustinScales510]

You mischaracterized my statement completely.

I'm FOR Mr Sanders, I think his position in the political landscape is perfectly acceptable.

Funny how you didn't mention how often Mrs Clinton's policies match with those of republicans.

I didnt mischaracterize it at all, youre just dodging and deflecting. I didnt bring up your talking point about clinton being a republican because I dont believe it.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I didnt mischaracterize it at all, youre just dodging and deflecting. I didnt bring up your talking point about clinton being a republican because I dont believe it.

She's an establishment politician

What's your opinion about all the money she's taken from financial institutions for speeches?

 

[BustinScales510]

She's an establishment politician

What's your opinion about all the money she's taken from financial institutions for speeches?

I dont think it is great but it doesnt bother me enough to not vote for her in the general against whatever climate change denying socially conservative candidate the gop has on the *actual* republican ticket.

I dont say this to excuse how she raises money, but I think she is slow to adapt. She is running a campaign the way past successful campaigns were by sucking up as much money as she could, assuming that everyone else would be too and not knowing that she would be running against a candidate that didnt.

Whoever wins it will be interesting to see what impact the outcome will have on future elections.

 

[ttystikk]

I didnt mischaracterize it at all, youre just dodging and deflecting. I didnt bring up your talking point about clinton being a republican because I dont believe it.

I'm speaking plainly. Your inability to accept what I'm saying at face value is what seems to be the problem.

So once again, please explain which of Mrs Clinton's stated policy positions isn't straight from the Republican playbook?

 

[BustinScales510]

I'm speaking plainly. Your inability to accept what I'm saying at face value is what seems to be the problem.

So once again, please explain which of Mrs Clinton's stated policy positions isn't straight from the Republican playbook?

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/climate/

There are plenty of others but youll have to take the time and do your own research, if youre able.

 

[londonfog]

I'm speaking plainly. Your inability to accept what I'm saying at face value is what seems to be the problem.

So once again, please explain which of Mrs Clinton's stated policy positions isn't straight from the Republican playbook?

Pro Choice for the win

 

[ChesusRice]

Lol that would be the dumbest mistake they ever made, in a long line of increasingly boneheaded moves.

They funded Nader in 2004.

 

[ChesusRice]

Pro Choice for the win

Universal Healthcare
She will push for it again once she is elected

 

[ChesusRice]

Now instead of memes, give me some good reasons to vote FOR Mrs Clinton.

Because Sanders will not be the nominee?

 

[tangerinegreen555]

I'm speaking plainly. Your inability to accept what I'm saying at face value is what seems to be the problem.

So once again, please explain which of Mrs Clinton's stated policy positions isn't straight from the Republican playbook?

Think Supreme Court. Think about the last 30 years. Think how much MORE impact that will have on things than a 4 or 8 year president. Think about another Scalia. Think! You' re voting for more than just the candidate...

 

[ttystikk]

They funded Nader in 2004.

With any luck, they're funding him again.