ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Irrelevant.If racism is learned, who was the first racist?
Who will be the last? THAT'S a much better question.
Irrelevant.If racism is learned, who was the first racist?
It will never end. Race is just a classification as much as wealthy/poor are classifications. People will always group each other and hate on the ones not like 'them'.Irrelevant.
Who will be the last? THAT'S a much better question.
Irrelevant to what?Irrelevant.
Who will be the last? THAT'S a much better question.
nope, just learned. not innate.Maybe a little of both.
in groups and out groups are very different from the vile type of racism you are known for.People will always group each other and hate on the ones not like 'them'.
your whole rhetorical douchebagerry is irrelevant.Irrelevant to what?
your whole rhetorical douchebagerry is irrelevant.
racism is learned. all scientific studies prove this to be true.
if you have something that proves otherwise, david, then present it.
you won't though, because it does not exist.
there is no excuse for racism like yours.
It was nice way of saying you asked a really stupid question.Irrelevant to what?
It was nice way of saying you asked a really stupid question.
On RIU, I believe it was you.Who was the first racist?
It's a rather simple question.
On RIU, I believe it was you.
Did that answer your question?
But if you are wanting to actually engage in an intelligent debate about the origin of racism, I'd be happy to discuss. You let me know.
It is for the purposes of this discussion.Suddenly it's not so irrelevant?
It is for the purposes of this discussion.
But your question is more metaphorical and poses a much bigger question, which is, who was the first for much of anything? Who was the first gay person? Who was the first person to control fire? Who sneezed first? Who was the first racist.
As stated earlier, completely irrelevant.
Thanks for stopping by.
a quick google search will also show that racism is learned, not innate.A quick Google search will shed some light on your confusion.
You can thank me later.
a quick google search will also show that racism is learned, not innate.
I don't think there is a first racist as much as groups of people discriminating against other groups of people, generally for profit, i.e. the brutal 17th century slave trade through early 20th century immigrant worker influx...and the unenlightened intolerance of people from different cultures who weren't born here, or whose descendants didn't originally come over on the Mayflower. You got a single 1st racist name? Who?Who was the first racist?
Why y'all having such a hard time answering a simple question?
Maybe if the government ever stops being racist we can hope for an end to it. But I doubt it. There is too much advantage for the government to exploit racism that exists and even doesnt exist.I'm still much more interested in the LAST racist.
You are dying to tell us. Who was the first racist? Was it Scalia? Or perhaps The Donald's dad? We all know he was an active KKK member. Perhaps it was David Duke? You know the guy, he supports Trump. Maybe it was one of our founding fathers? Good ole GW?Who was the first racist?
Why y'all having such a hard time answering a simple question?
So your one face says racism doesn't exist but only in the minds of the oppressed, and your other face blames it on Obama.Maybe if the government ever stops being racist we can hope for an end to it. But I doubt it. There is too much advantage for the government to exploit racism that exists and even doesnt exist.