Where am I
Well-Known Member
Nope...1.is victor the same" light house hydro" victor
2.is the power supply efficient?
3. nice light!
Nope...1.is victor the same" light house hydro" victor
2.is the power supply efficient?
3. nice light!
I saw that data, its PPFD, intensity at different distances, used to determine footprint and hanging height.Here you go. Hope this helps!
PAR(ppfd):
SolarSpec100: 1007umol@12", 496umol@24", 240umol@36"
SolarSystem400 (4 x SS-100): 1315umol@12", 855umol@24", 522umol@36"
Solarspec150: 1378umol@12", 628umol@24", 396umol@36"
SolarSystem 600(4 x SS-150): 1735umol@12", 1236umol@24", 810umol@36"
SolarSpec260: 1849UMOL@12", 1168umol@24", 685umol@36"
SolarSystem1040 (4 x SS-260): 1730umol@24", 981umol@36"
SolarEclipse250: 1046umol@24", 560umol@36", 410umol@48" (no lenses)
1600umol@24", 870umol@36", 503umol@48" (w/lenses)
SolarEclipse450UVB: 1980umol@12", 1207umol@24", 770umol@36", 546umol@48" (no lenses)
3000umol+@12, 2238umol@24", 1523umol@36", 974umol@48" (w/lenses)
SolarPro900/Pro9: 3000umol+@12", 1962umol@24", 1345umol@36", 878umol@48" (no lenses)
3000umol+@12", 2558umol@24", 1854umol@36", 1678umol@48" (w/lenses)
(Please note the lenses on the COB models are designed for high-bay applications that need a minimum of 48" for the overlapping to maximize coverage and intensity within the recommended footprint.)
People come here bash the shit out of things and ask for specs for what reason? You don't seem to care for the lights so why ask?no I never got an answer, stop claiming that I did.
Whats the umol/joules or PPF / watt for the amare?
i'm not bashing, i'm looking for info. have always appreciated amares design for a wide/fat spectrum,People come here bash the shit out of things and ask for specs for what reason? You don't seem to care for the lights so why ask?
At a minimum the se450 produces the same as go green 6 cob lights. A minimum! Go bash them
It's how they are driven that's what makes them different. When ran hard lowers efficiency. The higher the efficiency the higher the price.So go green, pacific, tasty won't be recommended either? I'm new to cobs so I'm learning. I assumed top bin Cree 3070 were all the same regardless of the name plate.
Thank you for being civil. Thanks for telling me about that This I do not have. I seen this once before but I really didn't look at that deep into it as my space is small and not some big warehouse.Abiqua might be in a pissy mood but he's right.
Ppf/w , umol/j is what counts on a grow fixture........tell Victor to break out that info.
If he actually has tested them in an integrating sphere as stated earlier, he has the #s.....No fighting necessary!
47% efficiency @~50w per COB(500w from wall)It's how they are driven that's what makes them different. When ran hard lowers efficiency. The higher the efficiency the higher the price.
I was following a few using this, they are really nice design on them. I almost bought 2 of them to fill some gaps on the sided of my lights. Just very easy to put in with other square units.Have no issues with my tasty led lights. New growth within 45 minutes of install
so what you said was???Nope...
Have no issues with my tasty led lights. New growth within 45 minutes of install
Haha1.is victor the same" light house hydro" victor
2.is the power supply efficient?
3. nice light!
so what you said was???
nope1. not same victor
nope2. power supply is not efficient
nope3. its not a nice light
i think you have an over defensive problem......
That's what I understood, they should all be very similar. If one is 2-3 % less efficient I couldn't care less if it suited my needs better. This is how it all started btw. I realized Victor wasn't a salesman looking for my money either. He offered assistance and did it with a smile. In my situation I would purchase his lights no matter the cost. Which I do believe are priced very well. After th 4/20 sale I beat the price of all the other companies offering similar lights. The best coverage, customer service and warranty. Then add in all the other features like top bin cree monochromes and uv.
What's fucked up is my order is large and delayed a little. I just offered him more money to divide the shipments and send it out partially. I was willing to pay double the shipping. His reply " it's not about the money" the next hour I got a shipping notification. What ever he strings he pulled he did it to help.
Case settled. I'm thrilled to death
Depends on the unit you are asking about. Their current 450 models are using LSD:i read that thanks ...my comment was mostly humour..sorry
i have my own cob lights..
$$/w is not what i look at.....
2."is the power supply efficient?"<---------------
3.nice lights..!
None of the cob fixture manufacturers have tested in a sphere yet? not that I'm aware of or they are not telling ..........It is expensiveThank you for being civil. Thanks for telling me about that This I do not have. I seen this once before but I really didn't look at that deep into it as my space is small and not some big warehouse.
Does every company use this? If they are using the same high end cree lights and more or less same driver wouldnt they all be near the same besides at what efficiencity that they are being ran at?
47% efficiency @~50w per COB(500w from wall)
I was following a few using this, they are really nice design on them. I almost bought 2 of them to fill some gaps on the sided of my lights. Just very easy to put in with other square units.
the variance in efficiency from gogreen, tasty, plc, amare and fluence can be quite large, potentially as high as 40% deviation. Different bins, different drivers, different currents and different cooling systems each alone can easily lead to a 10% deviation. so if I am a greedy cost cutting mfg, I can choose the lowest bin (-10%), use a cheap driver (-10%), run at a high current (-10%) and skimp on heatsinks (-10%).That's what I understood, they should all be very similar. If one is 2-3 % less efficient I couldn't care less if it suited my needs better.
I would expect this from other companies but not Amarethe variance in efficiency from gogreen, tasty, plc, amare and fluence can be quite large, potentially as high as 40% deviation. Different bins, different drivers, different currents and different cooling systems each alone can easily lead to a 10% deviation. so if I am a greedy cost cutting mfg, I can choose the lowest bin (-10%), use a cheap driver (-10%), run at a high current (-10%) and skimp on heatsinks (-10%).
Yeah I read the price before to make that thing... That's gotta be some mad coin to test in a unit like that.None of the cob fixture manufacturers have tested in a sphere yet? not that I'm aware of or they are not telling ..........It is expensive
The Swiss made leo led top bin cxb 3070 (3500/5000k)panel claims 2.5ppf/w, which is very good and the "math" backs it up. BUT i want proof and emailed them with no answer yet(month ago) if the #s came from a sphere or flat plane avg. bullshit?
http://www.leoledgrow.us/en/models
secondary lenses!/reflectors/diffusers/drivers/cooling! used will have an impact on the #s ,apart from the same top bin diodes.
fluence spyder x, nextlight mega have been tested properly and are just over 2umol/j...
You ever compare it to your HPS? During winter I will do a vs of my 600 HPS (Dont have a 1k) vs the amare 450 unit. I also plan to vs it against SS880(more or less). I know they are a bit old, but I do like to see how they compare. I think others may find it interesting, if not I sure as hell willquote
Also what light are you using atm?
i have 3@ 200w 4 cree 3590 3500k active cooled bars,
i really like being able to position each cob directly over a plant
of course i have hps too..ididn't start growing yesterday
i have used blackstar 220's[another victor..lol] for veg for years..great until half the circuit board goes
i have 2 @250 w 6 bridgelux high bays cobn lights each powered at 42 w each..they veg like crazy
i bought a spectrumking early lastyear ..i just took the reflector off it
its actually making decent looking buds..we will see..too [expensive]
i like tasty, and plc..riu homies!