The ignore is RIUs best software feature..its as if the offending parasite never existedBully. Name caller.
If that's your best argument then I don't need to listen to more.
The ignore is RIUs best software feature..its as if the offending parasite never existedBully. Name caller.
If that's your best argument then I don't need to listen to more.
Damn...and so as I sat shivering waiting for your next retort, you actually had me on ignore. Damn.n'awwwwwwwww and I just cleared my list..I even took @bravedave out of solitary.
Back you go @ChesusRice and @londonfog (for hanging out with CR).
Sweetie you and I both know you are much to noisy to put us on ignore. You will only use one of your sock puppet accounts to respond to us or you will just peek using Sky.n'awwwwwwwww and I just cleared my list..I even took @bravedave out of solitary.
Back you go @ChesusRice and @londonfog (for hanging out with CR).
Welcome back!Damn...and so as I sat shivering waiting for your next retort, you actually had me on ignore. Damn.
If only we could make those polls turn into votes. We cannot, so it looks like Bernie will not win.Sanders Crushes Trump at Polls:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-brasunas/sanders-crushing-trump-in_b_9862708.html
Wow, the table with election results compared to approval/disapproval ratings show some weird shit is going down this year. Going back to 1980, we've never seen such poor ratings on both candidates for the major parties. Hillary's supporters would like to think Trump is such a poor choice as candidate that even Hillary will win but this is new territory as far voter sentiment is concerned. I'd prefer to have Bernie as Trump's opponent. With Hillary as candidate, it looks like Trump has a pretty good chance. Or at least a better one.Sanders Crushes Trump at Polls:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-brasunas/sanders-crushing-trump-in_b_9862708.html
Maybe and maybe not.If only we could make those polls turn into votes. We cannot, so it looks like Bernie will not win.
So very true, seeing as he faces an insurmountable lead held by Clinton with the super delegates committed to her. So sorry, but not really, seeing if that noble Cicero, keeps fighting a noble fight.forever, we might see another McGovern, which would not be a good thing for the US in my opinion.If only we could make those polls turn into votes. We cannot, so it looks like Bernie will not win.
There is a reason for this.Wow, the table with election results compared to approval/disapproval ratings show some weird shit is going down this year. Going back to 1980, we've never seen such poor ratings on both candidates for the major parties. Hillary's supporters would like to think Trump is such a poor choice as candidate that even Hillary will win but this is new territory as far voter sentiment is concerned. I'd prefer to have Bernie as Trump's opponent. With Hillary as candidate, it looks like Trump has a pretty good chance. Or at least a better one.
who is to say that those in NY would not have voted Hillary. She is the Senator from New York as well. Hillary would have gotten 1.7 of those votes.There is a reason for this.
Bernie has better numbers all around because he's the people's choice.
This is why his national numbers are higher..included in the polling, are those who didn't get to vote.
Hillary appears to be the winner based upon her 2M voter lead..but ask yourself what would it be, if those disenfranchised Independents got to vote. NY alone had 3.2M independents who were not allowed to vote.
Her lead therefore is false, because the numbers are not representative of ALL voters.
Just like Mitt and his false numbers..boy did he learn a lesson.
THE GENERAL ELECTION WILL INCLUDE ALL VOTERS..Hillary is fooling herself.
There's a very clear conflict of interest when Clinton says she will regulate Wall St. (the same thing you seem to believe is a fairy tale if Sanders tries it) then receives over $2 million for giving speeches to the same industry she says she's going to regulate..You know what amazes me also about the supposed ties to Wall St and Big Business by Clinton, is that Hillary has for merely giving speeches, as if they are a problem, and shes a lying demon from hell? Why is it a problem to speak (and makes some cash,for election) to those motherfuckers? To simply not communicate? Seriously, she aint's exactly giving head to the CEO of Goldman Sachs.
And Sanders is doing acid if he thinks that in 4 years he will pass enough bills to really affect Wall St.
He is really just now a nuisance, leading a cult that wants to gain Utopia in 4 short years, and if he doesn't, he's out on his ass, and the Republican party, will be back, in a heartbeat with Trump leading the charge.
Reality sucks, but Sander is just a pain in the ass right now, where Clinton should be using her measly millions, against Trumps billions, instead of on this gnat.
So tell us what did she do for Wall St. after taking the money for speeches or are you speculating.There's a very clear conflict of interest when Clinton says she will regulate Wall St. (the same thing you seem to believe is a fairy tale if Sanders tries it) then receives over $2 million for giving speeches to the same industry she says she's going to regulate..
If you have to ask "What's the big deal?", you're not the least bit informed about this issue
There are a lot of strong arguments for Mr Sanders' candidacy in this analysis. Most of the reasons I think he's the right choice are listed plus a few new gems- cleanest record of any presidential candidate in the last century, vs a very possible indictment, anyone?Sanders Crushes Trump at Polls:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-brasunas/sanders-crushing-trump-in_b_9862708.html
Wasserman is preparing to be out on her ass, progressives in Florida are positioning to oust her from congress next cycle because of the way she handled the process. Keep an eye out for Tim Canova in that district, the results of that election should be a good indicator of where the party goes in the future.There are a lot of strong arguments for Mr Sanders' candidacy in this analysis. Most of the reasons I think he's the right choice are listed plus a few new gems- cleanest record of any presidential candidate in the last century, vs a very possible indictment, anyone?
The groundswell of popular support for Bernie is undeniable, even the most biased 'news' outlets can't hide it.
I think that if the democratic party fucks up somehow and DOESN'T nominate him, it will be a career ending mistake for a lot of 'liberal' apparatchiks... while they watch the Chump cruise to victory.
No conflict at all. politicians will take money from anyoneThere's a very clear conflict of interest when Clinton says she will regulate Wall St. (the same thing you seem to believe is a fairy tale if Sanders tries it) then receives over $2 million for giving speeches to the same industry she says she's going to regulate..
If you have to ask "What's the big deal?", you're not the least bit informed about this issue