Why Has No One Killed George Zimmerman?

T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so then make the case that slavery is moral you witless pedo.
Click to expand...
I already have. I defined what a positive moral act and a negative moral act.

I said it's possible to have slaves and not violate morality. But one does not have to have slaves to be moral. Having slaves, in other words, is not sufficient to make someone moral or imoral.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
I already have. I defined what a positive moral act and a negative moral act.

I said it's possible to have slaves and not violate morality. But one does not have to have slaves to be moral. Having slaves, in other words, is not sufficient to make someone moral or imoral.
Click to expand...
have you thought about possibly advancing your career by dancing on the street with a sign, instead of doing whatever you do now?

it would be a huge advance for someone like you.
 
T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
but you think it is OK to have sex with some 10 year old kids. wow.

scumbag.
Click to expand...
In a place dramatically different than modern world. Yeah.

I say it's ok because a large number of people think Mohammad was the most perfect moral man who ever lived. He fucked a 9 year old.

Since morality is a human construct, and many humans consider Mohammad moral, then yes.

Its a complex argument. A reactionary like you isnt used to complex thinking. So im sure you dont get it.
 
Michael Huntherz

Michael Huntherz

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
In a place dramatically different than modern world. Yeah.

I say it's ok because a large number of people think Mohammad was the most perfect moral man who ever lived. He fucked a 9 year old.

Since morality is a human construct, and many humans consider Mohammad moral, then yes.

Its a complex argument. A reactionary like you isnt used to complex thinking. So im sure you dont get it.
Click to expand...
Right-wingers are reactionaries, I think Uncle Buck is a left-wing radical, and I think this may be indicative of your level of understanding. Also, fuck Mohammed with a whole kennel full of dog dicks for that move. 9 and 10 isn't even a viably sexually mature female in almost every case, trying to make a case for that is fairly disgusting, despite your supposedly academic reasons for trying. If you had said some thirteen year olds were sexually mature and in a different moral climate we'd let 40 year old men bang them, well maybe you'd have some ground on which to stand, physiologically. Instead I'd say you're just twisted and trying to rationalize it.
 
Last edited:
T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
Michael Huntherz said:
Right-wingers are reactionaries, I think Uncle Buck is a left-wing radical, and I think this may be indicative of your level of understanding. Also, fuck Mohammed with a whole kennel full of dog dicks for that move. 9 and 10 isn't even a viably sexually mature female in almost every case, trying to make a case for that is fairly disgusting, despite your supposedly academic reasons for trying. If you had said some thirteen year olds were sexually mature and in a different moral climate we'd let 40 year old men bang them, well maybe you'd have some ground on which to stand, physiologically. Instead I'd say you're just twisted and trying to rationalize it.
Click to expand...
That's basically where this debate started. With young teens. I took it to the absurd extreme. I know of no society that has ever viewed sex with young children as ok. But a modern culture of 2 billion people reveres a man who fucked a 9 year old as the most moral man to ever live.

Why are our morals more valid than theirs?

Buck is a reactionary because he only reacts. Until I see otherwise.... He will continue to just be a reactionary force of left wing nonsense.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
That's basically where this debate started. With young teens. I took it to the absurd extreme. I know of no society that has ever viewed sex with young children as ok. But a modern culture of 2 billion people reveres a man who fucked a 9 year old as the most moral man to ever live.

Why are our morals more valid than theirs?

Buck is a reactionary because he only reacts. Until I see otherwise.... He will continue to just be a reactionary force of left wing nonsense.
Click to expand...
Jesus killed a classmate just because he could
 
Michael Huntherz

Michael Huntherz

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
That's basically where this debate started. With young teens. I took it to the absurd extreme. I know of no society that has ever viewed sex with young children as ok. But a modern culture of 2 billion people reveres a man who fucked a 9 year old as the most moral man to ever live.

Why are our morals more valid than theirs?

Buck is a reactionary because he only reacts. Until I see otherwise.... He will continue to just be a reactionary force of left wing nonsense.
Click to expand...
Our morals are more valid than theirs because we're making a humanistic attempt to minimize that sort of victimization of under-developed youths. You're not a monster, but I can't agree with you, either.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
Jesus never killed anyone because he is a myth and never existed.
Click to expand...
In one of the Jesus fairy tale books they eliminated He killed a classmate then resurrected him
Oh and this
Another time Jesus went forth into the street, and a boy running by, rushed upon his shoulder;

8 At which Jesus being angry, said to him, thou shalt go no farther.

9 And he instantly fell down dead:

10 Which when some persons saw, they said, Where was this boy born, that everything which he says presently cometh to pass?

11 Then the parents of the dead buy going to Joseph complained, saying, You are not fit to live with us, in our city, having such a boy as that:

12 Either teach him that he bless and not curse, or else depart hence with him, for he kills our children.

13 ¶ Then Joseph calling the boy Jesus by himself, instructed him saying, Why doest thou such things to injure the people so, that they hate us and prosecute us?

14 But Jesus replied, I know that what thou sayest is not of thyself, but for thy sake I will say nothing;

15 But they who have said these things to thee, shall suffer everlasting punishment.

16 And immediately they who had accused him became blind.
 
T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
In one of the Jesus fairy tale books they eliminated He killed a classmate then resurrected him
Oh and this
Another time Jesus went forth into the street, and a boy running by, rushed upon his shoulder;

8 At which Jesus being angry, said to him, thou shalt go no farther.

9 And he instantly fell down dead:

10 Which when some persons saw, they said, Where was this boy born, that everything which he says presently cometh to pass?

11 Then the parents of the dead buy going to Joseph complained, saying, You are not fit to live with us, in our city, having such a boy as that:

12 Either teach him that he bless and not curse, or else depart hence with him, for he kills our children.

13 ¶ Then Joseph calling the boy Jesus by himself, instructed him saying, Why doest thou such things to injure the people so, that they hate us and prosecute us?

14 But Jesus replied, I know that what thou sayest is not of thyself, but for thy sake I will say nothing;

15 But they who have said these things to thee, shall suffer everlasting punishment.

16 And immediately they who had accused him became blind.
Click to expand...
Do you think you're talking to someone who has any respect for those fairy tales?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top