Flowki
Well-Known Member
Unless somebody has factual research to suggest otherwise it would certainly seem a horrible idea feeding a bad industry to use kelp on the ''chance'' a certain type ''may'' benefit.How do you know that, because some sucker ad said so? Had it tested at a lab? Does the plant need supplemental hormones and if available would they interfere with its own natural hormonal processes or actually help?
You drank the cannabis rocket fuels kool-aid. It's human nature to see what you expect or want to see to justify your approach.
Here's the skinny on kelp for those who seek a sound professional approach: https://puyallup.wsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/403/2015/03/seaweed-extracts.pdf
You're also contributing to screwing up a fragile eco system.
5) Marketing: “Manufacturers’ claims for the benefits of these products go beyond what is
substantiated by the research.” “The number of products now on the market seems to outnumber the
published papers.”
These researchers’ conclusions say it all – seaweed extracts are aggressively marketed with little regard
for objective, scientific research. There is a final concern never addressed, which is the justification for
large-scale removal of vegetation from one ecosystem (the marine kelp “forests”) for application to
another (terrestrial landscapes). The ecological impacts of increased seaweed harvesting are currently
under investigation and the possibility of significant ecosystem damage is real. There is no argument that
seaweed products are useful and valuable to humans for the reasons discussed earlier. However, given
that there are few documented benefits from applying seaweed extracts to plants, this is not a justifiable
nor sustainable practice. The marketing of such products as “earth friendly” in this context should be
repugnant to environmentally conscious consumers.
Regardless of who is right. Is their any type of foliage feeding you would recommend UB?.