Forget Terrorism, Republicans Are America’s Greatest Existential Threat

[UncleBuck]

A does not = C when C is to redivert a massive amount of wealth from developed countries to non-developed countries.

there's that invocation of david duke conspiracy theories again.

Not only would Global Warming be used to extort money from big corporations; some liberals wanted to pay Third World nations for all the pollution caused by the industrialized world –a sort of Global welfare system. Once again White people were going to be punished and compelled to feel guilty about having a more advanced lifestyle than billions of Third World poor.

Like the seizure of the American health care system by the Democrats, global warming (or “climate change” as it is now called to avoid the embarrassingly obvious fact that the earth is by no means warming) gives the world Marxist establishment a chance to do by stealth what they have never been able to do by force and violence–impose socialism on the developed world and create what amounts to a global welfare state where the prosperous White nations will be forced to support the underdeveloped and primitive black and brown nations forever.

 

[NLXSK1]

Here is a website where OVER 31,000 SCIENTISTS DISAGREE THAT HUMANS ARE CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING including over 9000 PHD's....

How many scientists have to say there is global warming to make this 3%????

Math sucks!!!

 

[UncleBuck]

caps lock meltdown, no link. unhinged.

 

[Padawanbater2]

No, 97% of scientists didnt agree on anything.

A paper was taken out of context and a sub-set sample of people, some who barely could be considered scientists were tabulated to be 97% of scientists.

It is a lie, it has been proven as a lie and yet you continue to spout it as if it was the truth. Furthermore, you use consensus on a 'Theory' as proof of the theory despite conflicting results.

Science is the study of phenomenon to come up with explanations. It uses the scientific method. I have explained how the scientific method cannot be applied to global warming as you do not have a control group. Yes land temperatures are rising, yes CO2 is rising but A does not = C when C is to redivert a massive amount of wealth from developed countries to non-developed countries.

But hey, you want to save the planet using someone elses cash... I get it, I just dont agree with it.

Then what's preventing you from accepting the bet that's been issued to climate change deniers across this site? Name your own terms, if 2016 is not the hottest year on record at the end of the year, you win. If it is, I win.

If you're so sure of yourself, why don't you put some of your own skin in the game and put this to rest once and for all?

 

[bearkat42]

Here is a website where OVER 31,000 SCIENTISTS DISAGREE THAT HUMANS ARE CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING including over 9000 PHD's....

How many scientists have to say there is global warming to make this 3%????

Math sucks!!!

No way Fox News' payroll is that big.

 

[NLXSK1]

Then what's preventing you from accepting the bet that's been issued to climate change deniers across this site? Name your own terms, if 2016 is not the hottest year on record at the end of the year, you win. If it is, I win.

If you're so sure of yourself, why don't you put some of your own skin in the game and put this to rest once and for all?

Because 2016 being hotter than any previous recorded year in the last 200 years proves absolutely nothing except that the surface temperature is warmer than we have ever recorded it before. That is all it means. It is simply a point of data.

I have shown you geological data spanning hundreds of thousands of years indicating that at numerous times in this planets existence it has been hotter than it is now. And all of those times were before humans so you cant blame us.

So yes, according to some data it is getting warmer but it has been warmer in the past and colder in the past.

And I have repeatedly explained to you that if it gets cooler we end up in an ice age which is arguably much more dire than 3" of water level rise over a hundred years.

 

[Ace Yonder]

So if 97% of scientists decided that gravity was non-existant we would be floating around right? Or would that take 100% of them?

My opinion is based on the same facts that you have. The interpretation of those 'facts', the manipulation of those 'facts' and the resulting political agenda is what I am discussing.

Name one other thing that 97% of Current scientists believe in that is false. Name one fucking thing. Your opinion is worse than worthless, it has negative worth. Your opinion makes the world worse. I hope to god your stupidity already led to your sterilization, because your kids would be the WORST.

 

[NLXSK1]

Name one other thing that 97% of Current scientists believe in that is false. Name one fucking thing. Your opinion is worse than worthless, it has negative worth. Your opinion makes the world worse. I hope to god your stupidity already led to your sterilization, because your kids would be the WORST.

The 97% is a bullshit number. It is a piece of propaganda included in an opinion paper about opinion papers.

My opinion is that the earth gets hotter and cooler... Until you can demonstrate some steady state it has supposedly had then you are the one arguing with facts, not me.

 

[Ace Yonder]

Here is a website where OVER 31,000 SCIENTISTS DISAGREE THAT HUMANS ARE CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING including over 9000 PHD's....

How many scientists have to say there is global warming to make this 3%????

Math sucks!!!

Math doesn't suck, you're just terrible at it. "According to figures from the US Department of Education Digest of Education Statistics: 2008, 10.6 million science graduates have gained qualifications consistent with the OISM polling criteria since the 1970-71 school year. 32,000 out of 10 million is not a very compelling figure, but a tiny minority - approximately 0.3 per cent."

 

[NLXSK1]

Math doesn't suck, you're just terrible at it. "According to figures from the US Department of Education Digest of Education Statistics: 2008, 10.6 million science graduates have gained qualifications consistent with the OISM polling criteria since the 1970-71 school year. 32,000 out of 10 million is not a very compelling figure, but a tiny minority - approximately 0.3 per cent."

So 8 million scientists are looking at unemployment if global warming is not real... No bias there :]

THE STUDY STATING 97% DIDNT ASK 10 MILLION SCIENTISTS!!! FFS!!!

 

[Ace Yonder]

The 97% is a bullshit number. It is a piece of propaganda included in an opinion paper about opinion papers.

My opinion is that the earth gets hotter and cooler... Until you can demonstrate some steady state it has supposedly had then you are the one arguing with facts, not me.

I already said, your opinion doesn't matter and is invalid due to your excessive stupidity clouding your ability to think rationally. No one is arguing the climate was ever in a "steady state". Climate DOES go up and down. But now we are causing it to go up much much too fast. How is that logic hard to grasp? You are, quite literally, as dumb as a sack of bricks.

 

[Ace Yonder]

So 8 million scientists are looking at unemployment if global warming is not real... No bias there :]

THE STUDY STATING 97% DIDNT ASK 10 MILLION SCIENTISTS!!! FFS!!!

Keep telling yourself that. You go ahead and trust the 0.3%, that seems like the logical choice. Fucking dullard.

 

[NLXSK1]

I already said, your opinion doesn't matter and is invalid due to your excessive stupidity clouding your ability to think rationally. No one is arguing the climate was ever in a "steady state". Climate DOES go up and down. But now we are causing it to go up much much too fast. How is that logic hard to grasp? You are, quite literally, as dumb as a sack of bricks.

You are assuming it is us, you are assuming it is going up too fast and you are assuming we can do something about Russia, China and India which are the primary contributors to those evil gasses your pot plants need to survive!!!

I agree that humans have an impact on global warming so I would have been in the 97%. I say we dont have enough data to go off on a kneejerk reaction to spend trillions of dollars before further study. So, if I am in the 97% then the 97% number would arguably be bullshit right???

 

[NLXSK1]

Keep telling yourself that. You go ahead and trust the 0.3%, that seems like the logical choice. Fucking dullard.

Keep insulting me and thinking that it makes your argument better...

And I am the dullard?

 

[UncleBuck]

So 8 million scientists are looking at unemployment if global warming is not real... No bias there :]

THE STUDY STATING 97% DIDNT ASK 10 MILLION SCIENTISTS!!! FFS!!!

another caps lock meltdown.

 

[Ace Yonder]

You are assuming it is us, you are assuming it is going up too fast and you are assuming we can do something about Russia, China and India which are the primary contributors to those evil gasses your pot plants need to survive!!!

I agree that humans have an impact on global warming so I would have been in the 97%. I say we dont have enough data to go off on a kneejerk reaction to spend trillions of dollars before further study. So, if I am in the 97% then the 97% number would arguably be bullshit right???

You're NOT in the 97% because YOU'RE NOT A FUCKING SCIENTIST. You don't understand ANYTHING about the science, you don't know ANYTHING about the climate or what affects it, and you don't know ANYTHING about how to fix it. Unlike you, I am not ASSUMING anything, and neither are the scientists who are NEARLY UNANIMOUS IN AGREEMENT ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING. See? we can all use caps.

 

[UncleBuck]

I am the dullard?

oh yeah. not even in question.

 

[Ace Yonder]

Keep insulting me and thinking that it makes your argument better...

And I am the dullard?

Yes, you are the dullard. You are a mentally limited, irrational, uncomprehending ideologue who understands neither science nor math. My argument has all the evidence behind it, yours has nothing but an idiot's assertions.

 

[NLXSK1]

You're NOT in the 97% because YOU'RE NOT A FUCKING SCIENTIST. You don't understand ANYTHING about the science, you don't know ANYTHING about the climate or what affects it, and you don't know ANYTHING about how to fix it. Unlike you, I am not ASSUMING anything, and neither are the scientists who are NEARLY UNANIMOUS IN AGREEMENT ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING. See? we can all use caps.

97% of the scientists agreed that mankind had an effect on warming. That was where the agreement ended.

I also agree that mankind has an effect on warming. That is where my agreement apparently ends with you as well.

I have made this post as simple as possible so you can comprehend it.

 

[UncleBuck]

I also agree that mankind has an effect on warming.

so it'a not a hoax to distribute money to the third world anymore? you were pushing that retarded conspiracy theory a few hours ago.