bearkat42
Well-Known Member
No they don't. Not for killing black people anyway. If I'm not mistaken, I believe that they get away with it over 99% of the time.That's illegal and even cops go to jail for it.
No they don't. Not for killing black people anyway. If I'm not mistaken, I believe that they get away with it over 99% of the time.That's illegal and even cops go to jail for it.
What a bigoted statement. Why do you assume that? Is it because he is a man? Is it because he is of latin american descent?Your husband is un-educated.....
No they don't. Not for killing black people anyway. If I'm not mistaken, I believe that they get away with it over 99% of the time.
What a bigoted statement. Why do you assume that? Is it because he is a man? Is it because he is of latin american descent?
When does a person become educated? Does a bachelors degree count or do you need a phd to be considered educated?
If may be nap time homie. You're starting to ramble.Except when they dont get away with it then they get caught 100% of the time!!!
How did you and your husband wind up on food stamps ?What a bigoted statement. Why do you assume that? Is it because he is a man? Is it because he is of latin american descent?
When does a person become educated? Does a bachelors degree count or do you need a phd to be considered educated?
If may be nap time homie. You're starting to ramble.
Everyone knows about police shootings. They're on the news seemingly weekly.I was joking about your nonsensical assertion.
If someone gets away with something then nobody knows about it. Therefore your statistics are laughable...
Everyone knows about police shootings. They're on the news seemingly weekly.
So killing unarmed citizens isn't wrong? That's interesting.And if the cop is wrong they get prosecuted. Their prosecutions are on the news too!!
When was the last one you saw on the news that didnt get prosecuted because the 'Cop got away with it'....
So killing unarmed citizens isn't wrong? That's interesting.
So killing unarmed citizens isn't wrong? That's interesting.
Nothing that would require deadly force, unless maybe they were all ninjas.It depends on what those unarmed citizens are doing at the time of their killing.
It's all good in his world, dude - Just pump some shots into their backs as they are fleeing for their lives or club them to death, they'll be out of 'jail' in a few months...
This fucking thing, as example, should be tortured/burned to death in full view of thousands of his 'fellow officers'....die in martyrdom, might get the message across...
Nothing that would require deadly force, unless maybe they were all ninjas.
Eric Garner too?Michael Brown required deadly force and he wasnt armed with anything but stupidity.