2015 statistics on death by cop.
- Thread starter b4ds33d
- Start date
b4ds33d
Well-Known Member
I live not far from a semi sketchy area and I live in a cul-de-sac. In the cup-de-sac there are a couple black families and a couple Hispanic families and a couple white families. In a two week span every house was broken into, some more than once, except mine. Sometimes it's nice to be known as the crazy white guy with guns and dobermans.
It did however increase the fact that cops were a little dickish when you interact with them. I've always worked nights, and it's pretty common for me to be walking my dogs at 3am, and have done so since I moved into that house in 07. Then these guys would roll up on my and hop the curb and act all hands on guns and shit to the guy with the flashlight, 3 Doberman, and a fucking ball throwing stick, and feel the need to call in 2 more cars.
I do bite and hunt training with my dogs, and 2 of them were military war dogs, they were worried about me when all I had to do was order the dog loose and they have been fucked lol. i was like c'mon man you've seen me out here multiple times a night for years. And I loved the "psychology" they flounder to employ in those situations. They'd call in a female officer and play good cop-bad cop. I think at the most those situations if they felt they needed to interact with me would have been rolling up, chatting me from inside their vehicle, and rolling the fuck on.
It did however increase the fact that cops were a little dickish when you interact with them. I've always worked nights, and it's pretty common for me to be walking my dogs at 3am, and have done so since I moved into that house in 07. Then these guys would roll up on my and hop the curb and act all hands on guns and shit to the guy with the flashlight, 3 Doberman, and a fucking ball throwing stick, and feel the need to call in 2 more cars.
I do bite and hunt training with my dogs, and 2 of them were military war dogs, they were worried about me when all I had to do was order the dog loose and they have been fucked lol. i was like c'mon man you've seen me out here multiple times a night for years. And I loved the "psychology" they flounder to employ in those situations. They'd call in a female officer and play good cop-bad cop. I think at the most those situations if they felt they needed to interact with me would have been rolling up, chatting me from inside their vehicle, and rolling the fuck on.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i see a racist sock puppet and a white supremacist talking. certainly not any adults though. just some petulant, hateful, racist little children.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
awwww, poor racist white guy is being harassed by the cops and doesn't like it. let me cry a few tears for you, dickbreath.
see4
Well-Known Member
You clearly did not read the statistics that I provided, cited by fbi.gov. That's ok, your narrow one track mind can only focus on one thing at a time.
bravedave
Well-Known Member
You clearly have no idea what makes a statistic relevant. Now rub my feet. Lol.
see4
Well-Known Member
What? You don't make any sense. Like I said, you're not able to refute the facts I presented to you. So you resort to childish rhetoric in the hopes the conversation either ends or you distract from the fact you're a useless sack of shit that talks out his ass.
I'm betting it's both.
Either refute the facts I presented to you, cited by fbi.gov or go make me sandwich. You're my bitch.
Last edited:
choomer
Well-Known Member
I've often thought a procedure like this should be used for politicians but 24/7/365 of their tenure for exactly the same reasons.
Those that want power should know what it is to be watched all the time since they're already doing it to us and it might make both of those "public servants" think twice before doing something stupid.
Bucky, volumes could be written about the difference between what you see, and what the facts are, otherwise folks just use the word delusional.
I've proven this multiple times.
When you refute that I have, I ask for evidence, which is never presented by you and the next post from you is sure to have either racist or penis as it's main subject.
C'mon man, you've proven a few posts ago that you trawl for content people posted in threads you did not even participate in. Quoting proof of your assertions in threads we both have contributed to should be easy, even for you.
I've noticed you can't be bothered to use regular grammar rules like capitalization.
Is it to save time in your troll job or is it because you missed that day at school while practicing your future occupation as a "handyman"?
...and I didn't even say anything about police killing an unarmed 4% (according to the 2016 WaPo sourced infographic I posted) of total police fatalities and making you look like a failure of trolldom.
Oops!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he huffed and he puffed and he posted a TLDR.I've often thought a procedure like this should be used for politicians but 24/7/365 of their tenure for exactly the same reasons.
Those that want power should know what it is to be watched all the time since they're already doing it to us and it might make both of those "public servants" think twice before doing something stupid.
Bucky, volumes could be written about the difference between what you see, and what the facts are, otherwise folks just use the word delusional.
I've proven this multiple times.
When you refute that I have, I ask for evidence, which is never presented by you and the next post from you is sure to have either racist or penis as it's main subject.
C'mon man, you've proven a few posts ago that you trawl for content people posted in threads you did not even participate in. Quoting proof of your assertions in threads we both have contributed to should be easy, even for you.
I've noticed you can't be bothered to use regular grammar rules like capitalization.
Is it to save time in your troll job or is it because you missed that day at school while practicing your future occupation as a "handyman"?
...and I didn't even say anything about police killing an unarmed 4% (according to the 2016 WaPo sourced infographic I posted) of total police fatalities and making you look like a failure of trolldom.
Oops!
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Most of the time a gun is put to the purpose for which it was made, by the owner, to take his life. I'm OK with you keeping that gun.
Last edited:
choomer
Well-Known Member
No Bucky, I asked you for proof of your assertions on multiple occasions and you run like a scalded hog back to the safety of "Racist!" as most know you are wont to do.
Back up your claims, add it to your sig (like I did your 94K+ compensation for manhood that mysteriously disappeared), and then you get to wear big boy pants.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
did you know that barack obama started the iraq war and is deficit cutting us into fiscal insolvency?
Bugeye
Well-Known Member
Nice to know I have your blessing, not that I need it. I can think of many ways to off myself without a gun, but yeah, I have that option! Lol
bravedave
Well-Known Member
Ok retard, I tried to let you slither away with the knowledge that I had you pegged but instead you try to double down behind your meaningless bullshit. Not surprising, your reluctance to explain your mythical positive takeaways. But...now I think that maybe you actually think the data you present is actually mathematically favorable to your point of view. If that is the case I apologize for picking on someone who obviously has some brain damage. Originally, I read your "fact" filled post, laughed at its silliness and moved on, but to keep you from bursting a vein in your forehead I will point out your shortcomings...tired though so I will just address your first little leap
Bottom line is for your warped point to have legs you would have to be include the premise that the police are going out of their way to shoot blacks. Is that what you are trying to say? Sorry, thats not happening and as we move foreword through the rest of your illogic we will show that too. Speaking of rest, goodnight..
First please remember as we move foreword that here you try to use the total populations as tools for your point. Here your invention (and this is assuming your numbers are not fabricated) is that cops kill blacks at a higher rate than whites as a % to the total population. Your claim comes smothered in weak sauce. The numbers do not tell a story of racism by cop but is more an indictment of blacks more often putting themselves in a position to get shot by police. Lol. It could just as easily be construed from this data that white people lead more law-abiding lives.
Bottom line is for your warped point to have legs you would have to be include the premise that the police are going out of their way to shoot blacks. Is that what you are trying to say? Sorry, thats not happening and as we move foreword through the rest of your illogic we will show that too. Speaking of rest, goodnight..
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
well, you finally made a true statement. surprising. let's see how you follow this up.
yep, straight into white supremacy-ville. no surprise there.
Can the deaf phonetically spell?
b4ds33d
Well-Known Member
i'll have to wait to hear back from one. however i'm blind so let's see.
bravedave
Well-Known Member
Do the dumb read with their lips moving?
Did you as you typed that? Wow you multitask in stupidity.
Way to comprehend bro.
See b4ds33d. He got it.
bravedave
Well-Known Member
Next...oh my goodness, Retard. Seriously, when I put your logic next to your math I wonder if I am arguing with an 8 year old. What clouds your abilities? Crack baby?So anyway to your "facts"...
First, I find it a bit strange that fbi.gov would portray numbers this way. Why would they include hispanics in both columns? Maybe an idiot would fathom that it effectively eliminates the question as to where they should be put...how about in their own column? I personally can only imagine that its done for optics as I assume th numbers cause the white % to rise above 60% and the black total to fall below 40%. Just saying that if you even had a point to begin with (you don't) 59-41 looks like less of a disparity than 61-39. Nice try, but here again you seem to think that "proportionally" this is in your favor. Using your own 13% of the population value...should we not see the final tally be closer to that number. Of course we should, but instead you try to portray this like the populations are even. They are not. So what this really shows is that blacks are committing violent crime at a rate, at least, 3x higher than their population should portend. Looking at a couple of your statistics...
10093 murders "proportionally" should show us 1300 or so murders by blacks and yet it shows they actually commit, not 13%, but 51% of the murders. And this somehow is backing for your point that they whites commit "proportionally" more crime??? Ummmm... No, it doesn't. Just the opposite, Retard. Even if I take your numbers for assault, which on the surface seem disproportionate, still show blacks exceeding their proportional alottment by over 20%.
The only thing funnier than you presenting these numbers as if its a defense of black criminality is seeing the idiots who believe your post does that. Hard to imagine that much stupidity exists in one group arguing in one thread. You have a chart for that? Lol.
Off to work...have a great day.