Because ALL Black People Look Alike?

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Finding a criminal in a cop outfit is not surprising. I know several. It seems like every coke-dealing bouncer I knew took up popo work. It is not surprising to find a spy in an intelligence agency - that's where they go!

What is unconscionable is how the police protect them when they know they are bad. Intel agencies will resist coming to the conclusion of a spy in their midst but when they figure it out, they do something about it. In my opinion the police generally don't.

The police are a public utility. They are not a private club. They are not an institution to change or impede society's ability to change.

Society needs a police force. Kids go missing. People hurt each other.

The drug war has destroyed the relationship between the police and society. Police have pulled people over for minor infractions as a way of trolling for serious infractions (like possession of 6.25 grams of weed) for years and that mentality has to be destroyed.
 
Last edited:

abe supercro

Well-Known Member
Long story, about 2 years ago we were asked by someone in our church to help this homeless man, and we agreed and brought him into our home for a week. He was a creep and we asked him to leave after one week. Apparently he was using his phone to connect to our internet to send kiddy porn to people. Only happened for a week and we kicked him out and it stopped, well from our home anyhow. 8 months latter we had a swat team at our home breaking in our doors, they held a semi auto rifle at my head, then roughed my husband up and through him up against a door in our home with a deadbolt and he sustained a bad head injury which has caused hin to have a seizure disorder...it was a nightmare...then they carted his ass to jail because of the weed they found in his office. He since had to quit his job he was a truck driver. He has medical issues, then PTSD, and also can no longer drive trucks because of this, it has been devestating... they confiscated all our electrics...
Damn, now I know what you meant by protecting your ip. Sounds like the popo became jurors too, with the head smash, based on how things first appeared.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I will say in anyone's defense, about 2 years ago my husband and I helped a homeless man, let him into our home for a week, a friend from our church asked and we said okay. Well, this guy ended up being a real creep. 8 months after letting him into our home we had a SWAT team ramming down our doors, and I had a semi pointed at my head. This guy had used our internet to send some child pornagraphy picture's. It showed up on our IP address. They raided our home, took all electronics and kept them for 6 months, and carted my husband off to jail for the weed they found in his office. Eventually, the charges were dismissed for the weed, they found nothing on the electronics we had because we did nothing, no charges on that, they arrested this other guy about 4 months after the raid. We are still dealing with the Attorney General's office to get them to compensate us for the injury, time, money, doc fee's etc that we incurred in regards to this. You can fight, but sometimes in the situation you can't while it is happening..
I call bullshit. This is a made up story.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Too late Andrew I already copied where you illegally changed what I posted that's fraud and you can't change somebody's words and now you've done it 3 times it's all going to the appropriate authorities I'm done with you
LOL!

tell me how it goes with the internet police.
 

StevieBevie

Well-Known Member
nothing about this is illegal.

you were arrested for child pornography. you are a pedophile.

don't have a meltdown you rancid racist pedo.
Keep it up Andrew no one was arrested in my family not myself or my husband for anything that had to do with child pornography, they knew the guy they were looking for and we had kicked him out eight months earlier after helping him, a homeless man for a week with food and shelter the only thing my husband was arrested for was some pot in his office and the charges were dropped what you've done is illegal here and it's harassment and it's fraud and it's defamation of character keep it up I love that you keep posting this stuff.
 

StevieBevie

Well-Known Member
LOL!

tell me how it goes with the internet police.
Your so ignorant and childish , I'm not sending the internet police after you, I know your name I know your last name, I know where you live and I know what your business is that's enough to make your life pretty miserable legally I don't have to do anything but tell the right people and while I'm at it I think I'm going to sue you your so ignorant you messed with the wrong person.
 

StevieBevie

Well-Known Member
You're off ignore Andrew I am in the process of copying everything that you've ever said to me since the very beginning you have a great day
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
That's YOUR fault. You had a right to ask. The police aren't supposed to just be allowed to handcuff you "just because". They didn't even know who this young man was. Why is that OK?


Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest. “Citizens may resist unlawful arrestto the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
If you read the case the arresting officer did not state he was placing the suspect under arrest. The cop did not follow proper procedure. This does not give you carte blache to fight the police whenever you feel like it.

Cops can handcuff you for their own safety, they dont have to arrest you to do it.
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
That's YOUR fault. You had a right to ask. The police aren't supposed to just be allowed to handcuff you "just because". They didn't even know who this young man was. Why is that OK?


Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest. “Citizens may resist unlawful arrestto the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
I wish Bad Elk v. U.S. was still valid and could be cited as precedent. Unfortunately it seems that this is a bit of a misconception. As Wikipedia puts it: "This case has been widely cited on the internet, but is no longer considered good law in a growing number of jurisdictions.[1] Most states have, either by statute or by case law, removed the unlawful arrest defense for resisting arrest. The case also received negative treatment in 532U.S. 318 (2001) [2] holding that an arrest without a warrant, even for a misdemeanor, is lawful."
and
"Modern sources citing Plummer and Bad Elk have tended to discuss the issue as defense against unlawful force; under contemporary law in most jurisdictions, a person may not use force to resist an unlawful arrest.[44] The Plummer quote has been noted to be a fabrication, not appearing in the text of the opinion.[45]"
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
but is no longer considered good law in a growing number of jurisdictions.[1] Most states have, either by statute or by case law, removed the unlawful arrest defense for resisting arrest.[45]"
Pretty hard to enforce a "police state" with that law in place. Gotta be able to keep "the coloreds" under control.
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
Pretty hard to enforce a "police state" with that law in place. Gotta be able to keep "the coloreds" under control.
Probably. Also because they know how many rednecks have guns, and if they give them even an inkling that they can start shooting to defend themselves from cops it will be the wild west all over again. I mean jesus, look how much a fuss they made over Waco and Ruby Ridge even WITHOUT that law on the books.
 
Top