Assange doesn't have shit.

Ace Yonder

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
You didn't make a point, you just spewed a bunch of worn out BS that isn't true. No, it is exactly as I said, I just don't respond to it because it is BS.
Click to expand...
Which parts did you feel were inaccurate? Any actual evidence to contradict anything I said would be welcomed, upon request I can easily cite sources for every claim I made.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Ace Yonder said:
Which parts did you feel were inaccurate? Any actual evidence to contradict anything I said would be welcomed, upon request I can easily cite sources for every claim I made.
Click to expand...
Deciphering...

"Please respond to my list of BS..."

There was no truth in any of it. Every single statement you made to support your assertion that she hates science was categorically false and intentional disinfo. Also, she taught medicine at Harvard for like a really long time, just an fyi.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Let's see, there's Robert Byrd, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and Henry Kissinger just off the top of my head for starters. She surrounds herself with ruthless career politicians and war-hawks, speaks praise of them and even calls them personal friends. Ok, in the case of Donald Trump, that has changed and she is now his sworn adversary but these are all despicable shit hills that she's so chummy with.
 
Rizlared

Rizlared

Well-Known Member
No one should support Clinton, she is corrupt to the core.

No one should support trump, he's a clown playing up to idiotic right wingers.

Different faces, different colour ties, same overlords. Your 'democracy' is an illusion...and yet you cite it as you try and bomb other nations inti being democratic
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
He has a 20k reward for info on the death of Seth Rich.
Click to expand...
The more i ponder this, the more inclined i am to call bullshit on it. I figure Assange sees it as a low risk ploy to hide the fact that the source was the Russians. He won't be offering any evidence of Rich leaking the info despite just blowing the guy's cover.

I also think the lowball number for the reward is so low that it is not going to entice anybody into giving him information even if it was some street criminal type murder. He figures if somebody does rat somebody out, he can afford yhe 20k and still claim Rich was his leaker.
 
Last edited:
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Rizlared said:
No one should support Clinton, she is corrupt to the core.

No one should support trump, he's a clown playing up to idiotic right wingers.

Different faces, different colour ties, same overlords. Your 'democracy' is an illusion...and yet you cite it as you try and bomb other nations inti being democratic
Click to expand...
So who you gonna vote for?

Nobody?
 
Rizlared

Rizlared

Well-Known Member
No one's opinion is of any use to you.

You just spout shit then insult.

A one trick pony. Well as long as it makes you happy I guess
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Let's see, there's Robert Byrd, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and Henry Kissinger just off the top of my head for starters. She surrounds herself with ruthless career politicians and war-hawks, speaks praise of them and even calls them personal friends. Ok, in the case of Donald Trump, that has changed and she is now his sworn adversary but these are all despicable shit hills that she's so chummy with.
Click to expand...
Well, you have me there. Hillary should never have accepted advice from those people. I mean, there is no way she could have listened and still made up her own mind.
 
Ace Yonder

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
The more i ponder this, the more inclined i am to call bullshit on it. I figure Assange sees it as a low risk ploy to hide the fact that the source was the Russians. He won't be offering any evidence of Rich leaking the info despite just blowing the guy's cover.

I also think the lowball number for the reward is so low that it is not going to entice anybody into giving him information even if it was some street criminal type murder. He figures if somebody does rat somebody out, he can afford yhe 20k and still claim Rich was his leaker.
Click to expand...
Not to mention the fact that if he actually cared about figuring out who did it, he wouldn't have offered a reward that is LESS that the reward that is already offered by D.C.
Why would anyone take $20,000 and give the info to Assange when they could get $25,000 by going through standard channels? It actually seems like the move of someone who wants to SAY they care, but wants to make damn sure no one takes them up on their offer. Just more ways for him to cast aspersions.

New Bitmap Image.jpg
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
socalcoolmx said:
I love posting video of Mike Malloy because it makes unclebuck pissed that he Mike malloy is a real progressive and most progressives agree with him


Click to expand...
That was uninformative. He didn't spend much time on the US role in all this. Assuming you really are living in that shit hole called Los Angeles, your focus on Israel makes your bias suspect when the only affect you can have is on what the US does. Nonetheless, it's possible to be against US military support for Israel and at the same time not be antisemitic.

The thing is, you come across as just another shallow unjustifiably confident idiot, so it's my guess you are just another bigot. Tell me, do you deny the holocaust too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top