calliandra
Well-Known Member
How did you reach this conclusion?So you need 1600-2000 micromoles per m2
How did you reach this conclusion?So you need 1600-2000 micromoles per m2
off the subject but we are totally similar in our reluctance to kill plants...How did you reach this conclusion?
I actually like this idea Bob..That's the problem with several hours of darkness in a cycle, stretching. But what about say 7/1 repeating? How much stretching could 1 hour of dark at a time cause? Here's an experiment to try, one plant on 21/3 and another on 7/1.
Well i have plenty of empirical evidence this is false, I've grown many ounces with much less than that.How did you reach this conclusion?
It was in the abstract you linked. @Resinhound, you don't HAVE to use 2000 umol, you just CAN if you so choose. Apparently more than that would be a waste of light. Not that many people would try to use more than 1000-1200w of HPS per m2 anyway, due to heat. You can DL the full article here for free btw.How did you reach this conclusion?
Abstract
The effect of different levels of photon flux densities (000, 400, 800, 1200, 1600 and 2000 μmol m−2 s−1) on gas and water vapor characteristics of four high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) yielding drug type varieties (HPM, K2, MX and W1) of Cannabis sativa was studied. Plants of each variety were grown from seeds. On flowering, male plants were removed and vegetatively propagated clones of selected female plants were used for gas and water vapor studies at different photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFDs). Our data show an increasing trend in photosynthesis (PN), transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gCO2) with increase in PPFD up to 2000 μmol m−2 s−1 in all varieties at optimum growth temperature (25 ± 3 °C). However, the magnitude of increase and maximum rate of PN (PN max) varied considerably with the varieties. Highest PN was observed in W1 followed by MX, K2 and HPM. Water use efficiency (WUE) in W1, MX and HPM increased with PPFDs up to the highest level tested, whereas, in K2 the highest WUE was observed at 1600 μmol m−2 s−1. Our results suggest that this species is able to use high level of PPFDs for its PN and therefore, may be cultivated in sun exposed areas in the field or under high PPFDs using indoor grow lights for the optimum growth. Strict control of other environmental factors, however, needs to be maintained while growing the plants indoor.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214786115000078
Aw thanks, that means alot to me! - and thanks to everyone who is making this thread as rich as it is with their contributions and questions!off the subject but we are totally similar in our reluctance to kill plants...
I don't think I've EVER seen a companion plant like that badass tomato plant..
I admit, even me, woulda given that tomato a good pruning once it was shadowing the whole plant..
kudo's to you
and kudo's to a good thread
haven't read a grow-thread as interesting as this one in a LONG time.
carry on
Do share pleaseWell i have plenty of empirical evidence this is false, I've grown many ounces with much less than that.
Ah but no. What they are doing in that experiment is checking how the plants do under different light intensities (and yes I'd really like to read the whole thing but wasn't finding how -- too bad that link doesn't work for me waaah!).It was in the abstract you linked. @Resinhound, you don't HAVE to use 2000 umol, you just CAN if you so choose. Apparently more than that would be a waste of light. Not that many people would try to use more than 1000-1200w of HPS per m2 anyway, due to heat. You can DL the full article here for free btw.
Nah, I'm getting a "not found" message from the serverTo get the article, you just go to the linked page, check "I'm not a robot" and click the download button.
Genuinely one of the funniest posts I've read on this forumthis is the slow part of a grow thes is where patients wears thin & I've made most of my mistakes the other boo- boo's mainly come from supercropping after the 4 th. beer
what zoom microscope do you use?So I went out this weekend to try and source some (worm)compost - I do know of a place in a town nearby where they have some, but as I was short on time I made do - for starts - with what I found in the stores nearby. "Gardener's Compost", they call it, from Compo.
When I opened the bag, sheer blackness. Uhoh. Bad sign.
View attachment 3764105
Checking it out under the microscope, I found the microbiology to be less diverse than the really bad soil I've been recovering in the garden outside.
View attachment 3764107
A diverse bacterial population, and an occasional shred of a beneficial fungus, that was it. not a single "higher" critter about.
So I brewed up a tea, just in case they were dormant and/or my inexperienced eye just wasn't seeing them.
I checked it after about 26hrs and a dire sight it was. Not a decent flagellate in sight. Not a single testate amoeba, which I can recognize well (I was beginning to doubt myself for not finding anyone in there.. lmao). Forget nematodes.
Instead, I saw growing lactobacillus populations, actinomyces, and a single "fishie" - which I'm pretty sure, tho not certain yet, are ciliates. A clump of lactobacilli:
View attachment 3764131
There was no one hiding in that compost, there just wasn't anyone there.
Seeing the tea contained lots of "biology starters", all those facultative creatures can still be useful: I transplanted some hydrangeas into planters this weekend - which had been half-filled with really bad, oh, dirt lol
So I added the waste-reduced-organic matter I had bought as "compost" to it, and then gave them the tea. Those guys can get the environment started, better microbial innoculation pending!
But back indoors!
So Lefty is doing her thing, but not exploding. Yeah, I need some compost tea for her
Thing is, with all this change in mindset that is involved with going soil food web, I don't have a plan B.
So I'll probably be taking that trip towards end of the week, tho it feels too late for the Pineapple Express.
Autos sure are stressy!
Here she is, at day 20:
View attachment 3764133 View attachment 3764134
I was going to chop the BerryBomb, but when I checked the trichs they're still half ways clear. So giving her a few more days too.
View attachment 3764132
There was some chopping on that side of the closet anyways: I've trimmed the tomato down to the height of the lights so she doesn't eat any more of my precious soil than is necessary haha.
Oh and the tomatoes are beginning to ripen
Pineapple Express #1 has gone into cure. I overdried her a bit, hopefully not too much - Humidity went to 58% when I bottled the buds up. Added a bovar 62% the next day.
For those interested in yields: she actually threw 14g dry haha
A very uplifting and activating smoke, the terpenes aren't much developped - just a whiff of pineapple, but that's certainly to do with the chinese lights. My NL#5xhaze still amazes with her complexity
that nematode!!!!!!! ahhhh i love this. that song makes this so entertainingHere it is - stalking a flagellate through living soil and all the sights to be seen there - accompanied by one of my alltime favorite bands
This one: http://www.microscopenet.com/40x400x-binocular-compound-siedentopf-microscope-with-builtin-digital-camera-soil-p-9814.htmlwhat zoom microscope do you use?
Haha thanks, glad you enjoyed it! Yeah those nematodes are crazy when they're on the huntthat nematode!!!!!!! ahhhh i love this. that song makes this so entertaining
Haha thanks Stick!Well done on the harvest Calli, nearly triple than what you expected!
I wish I could contribute more to this thread, but I'm just a DWC grower and not as smart as you proper soil growers, jesus, you guys use some long words!! PMSL