Big smo
Well-Known Member
Now that's a trick question.g'day Cobby,
Whats the driver current run at to get the CLU058 1825 @ 50w for 60% eff?
VG
Now that's a trick question.g'day Cobby,
Whats the driver current run at to get the CLU058 1825 @ 50w for 60% eff?
VG
Thanks Cobbyat 50W an 1825 uses about 1000 mA
Thanks Cobby,at 50W an 1825 uses about 1000 mA
look at the CLU058 3618 - that is the beast COB at the moment, but you pay a premium price for them.Thanks Cobby
Thanks Cobby,
Is there any COBs that run better then 60% eff & have higher wattage then 50watts?
Also do u drill & screw to mount the 1825 COBs to a HS?
cheers
is the 3618 50v?ding ding, twist beat me to it.
assuming you need more than one cob 3 1825s are more efficient than 2 3618s at the same price. its like 50% more for 30% more performance... but if you want the best and have to have it.....
Thx but i prefer eff over bigger wattage & a less heavier DIY light.hlg 240h-2100 and hlg320h-2800 best single driver options if you want to max them out (or cut those currents in half for 2 cobs per driver, eg 240h-1050 and 320h-1400)
is the 3618 50v?
Would the 1825 @ 50w run on a smaller 105 x 60mm pin HS?
https://northerngrowlights.com/collections/diy/products/sst105passive-heatsink-kit
at 50W you would be well under 25W of heat.Thx but i prefer eff over bigger wattage & a less heavier DIY light.
If the light ever fell it could take out all the plants in 1 hit.
So wats the smallest passive pin HS can be used for 1825's since u have them in stock?
You rockHLG-320H-C1750B back in stock
FWIW i did a test last night and pulled a separate cxb3590 out of inventory to make sure the one i had wasnt bunk. the old chip looked ok, all the dies lit up. new chip beat it by 5-6% across the board. same batch of chips. i remounted old chip with paste instead of pad to see if that was the difference, nope, it was a dog.You damn well better believe that Cree's lm/w #s on the data sheet is the reality , NO inflating===== legal department would have a shit-fit. They have enough problems with t8 retrofit bulbs being recalled twice in a row
possible that Citi is underrating to stay within their specs/ no binning
Also possible your tests aren't dead accurate
Is DB just the highest bin? You might see more swing than usual if they are just shooting above 13000 lumens and sky is the limit.FWIW i did a test last night and pulled a separate cxb3590 out of inventory to make sure the one i had wasnt bunk. the old chip looked ok, all the dies lit up. new chip beat it by 5-6% across the board. same batch of chips. i remounted old chip with paste instead of pad to see if that was the difference, nope, it was a dog.
so that said i was surprised to see such variations in chips from same bin same lot. i guess 5-6% could be within DB bin but its definitely at the extremes. in any case the average of the two chips fell right on top of the clu048-1818 curve in the 40-70W range (with clu pulling away above 70W) so my conclusion is the same, that 1818 is a 'match' for CXB at low currents despite the fact that it was slightly 'beating' it on that last run of tests. when youre +/- a few % you are in teh range of chip variation as has been discussed earlier.
in any case thats still a70 cri cxb vs 80 cri everything else, so theres a little handicap built in there as well