Big smo
Well-Known Member
Now that's a trick question.g'day Cobby,
Whats the driver current run at to get the CLU058 1825 @ 50w for 60% eff?
VG
![]()
Now that's a trick question.g'day Cobby,
Whats the driver current run at to get the CLU058 1825 @ 50w for 60% eff?
VG
![]()
Thanks Cobbyat 50W an 1825 uses about 1000 mA
Thanks Cobby,at 50W an 1825 uses about 1000 mA
look at the CLU058 3618 - that is the beast COB at the moment, but you pay a premium price for them.Thanks Cobby
Thanks Cobby,
Is there any COBs that run better then 60% eff & have higher wattage then 50watts?
Also do u drill & screw to mount the 1825 COBs to a HS?
cheers![]()
is the 3618 50v?ding ding, twist beat me to it.
assuming you need more than one cob 3 1825s are more efficient than 2 3618s at the same price. its like 50% more for 30% more performance... but if you want the best and have to have it.....
Thx but i prefer eff over bigger wattage & a less heavier DIY light.hlg 240h-2100 and hlg320h-2800 best single driver options if you want to max them out (or cut those currents in half for 2 cobs per driver, eg 240h-1050 and 320h-1400)
is the 3618 50v?
Would the 1825 @ 50w run on a smaller 105 x 60mm pin HS?
https://northerngrowlights.com/collections/diy/products/sst105passive-heatsink-kit
at 50W you would be well under 25W of heat.Thx but i prefer eff over bigger wattage & a less heavier DIY light.
If the light ever fell it could take out all the plants in 1 hit.
So wats the smallest passive pin HS can be used for 1825's since u have them in stock?
HLG-320H-C1750B back in stock
You damn well better believe that Cree's lm/w #s on the data sheet is the reality , NO inflating===== legal department would have a shit-fit. They have enough problems with t8 retrofit bulbs being recalled twice in a row
possible that Citi is underrating to stay within their specs/ no binning
Also possible your tests aren't dead accurate
FWIW i did a test last night and pulled a separate cxb3590 out of inventory to make sure the one i had wasnt bunk. the old chip looked ok, all the dies lit up. new chip beat it by 5-6% across the board. same batch of chips. i remounted old chip with paste instead of pad to see if that was the difference, nope, it was a dog.
so that said i was surprised to see such variations in chips from same bin same lot. i guess 5-6% could be within DB bin but its definitely at the extremes. in any case the average of the two chips fell right on top of the clu048-1818 curve in the 40-70W range (with clu pulling away above 70W) so my conclusion is the same, that 1818 is a 'match' for CXB at low currents despite the fact that it was slightly 'beating' it on that last run of tests. when youre +/- a few % you are in teh range of chip variation as has been discussed earlier.
in any case thats still a70 cri cxb vs 80 cri everything else, so theres a little handicap built in there as well