Obviously, if you had read the thread thoroughly, you would have seen that it would be professionals like doctors, law enforcement, Nurses, Utility workers, Federal Employees!, nutritionists, scientists etc. etc. ..... alongside anyone else that would be willing to contribute that small part of their lives to do an Huge amount of good! This is about the 1,000,000 arrests per year for marijuana!! and the millions of people that are going through hard times simply because of the prejudice against pot that is held in places like work, school, etc. etc. .... and again to those of you that posted that you don't care if its legal or not.... I'd rather it be you that get locked up for it, because you would deserve it more than I, I at least am trying to stop that from happening... Decriminalization would only stop jail time from occurring, it would not stop the other negative ramifications of it not being completely legal... like fines, classes, etc. that are Forced upon you.The status quo is in effect because the average citizen has been deceived through propaganda. Grungy, unemployed, protesters conducting hunger strikes will not change anyone's opinion. Education will. When the average rational person is presented with the facts, they usually admit the War on Drugs is a failure and should be eliminated.
Facts include:
The racist origins of cannabis prohibition.
The industrial concerns (Dow Chemicals & William Randolph Hearst) using cannabis prohibition as a means of eliminating industrial hemp.
The amount of money wasted on the failed War on Drugs.
The amount of tax revenue promised by way of re-legalization of cannabis.
The economic, environmental, and agricultural potential of industrial hemp.
Mankind has used cannabis for at least 6,000 years, well into prehistory. It's only been prohibited in the last century.
The simple fact that so many people use it now, regardless of prohibition. Should not public policy reflect this reality rather than deny it?
Cartels, very bad men, are getting rich off prohibition. That existing black market activity should be legitimized; regulated and taxed.
These facts presented respectfully, can open the minds of those closed through government lies.
Patronizing tone aside, I did read the thread thoroughly.Obviously, if you had read the thread thoroughly, you would have seen that it would be professionals like doctors, law enforcement, Nurses, Utility workers, Federal Employees!, nutritionists, scientists etc. etc. ..... alongside anyone else that would be willing to contribute that small part of their lives to do an Huge amount of good! This is about the 1,000,000 arrests per year for marijuana!! and the millions of people that are going through hard times simply because of the prejudice against pot that is held in places like work, school, etc. etc. .... and again to those of you that posted that you don't care if its legal or not.... I'd rather it be you that get locked up for it, because you would deserve it more than I, I at least am trying to stop that from happening... Decriminalization would only stop jail time from occurring, it would not stop the other negative ramifications of it not being completely legal... like fines, classes, etc. that are Forced upon you.
It won't work because it is a ludicrous concept. My method has already changed more minds than yours ever will. Organized anarchy is a contradiction in terms.That, is where we disagree. and thanks for doing your part to try and make it not work. And if you had read the thread thoroughly than you would have noticed the part about professional people being involved, and wouldn't have posted what you did... And Trying to get people to Organize this is definitely Anarchy... I'm sorry you took offense to my inference, but it happens a lot that I will post things and make sure to put certain things into the posts, and people will read it, and then go on posting like they didn't...
That is what separates California from a lot of other States, we Stood up for what we believed in, banned together, and made Something happen. It fell far short of nationwide legalization... but we used the method you described to do it... and I am not going to wait 20 years (and maybe spend 5-10 in prison) for it to be legalized, while millions of people have their lives tainted or ruined by the current legislature, especially when the numbers are there, the Facts support the cause, and the only thing that is lacking is for a few million "stoners/professionals" to grow some freakin balls and do something for the greater good! There are tons and tons of activists that will jump on board enthusiastically when they hear about this, put in a lot of hard work, and rally people together to get it done... and when we hit the streets, feel free to sit in your house and hope that some one is out there educating people properly about pot, when the current educational system and government doesn't, won't, and instead demonize it to the best of their ability.
And, the King of England thought that the idea of America was a pipe dream as well... smoked up by those hippy stoner founding fathers of ours...
Which is ironic because you wrote something absurdly stupid using a patronizing tone.When I was a kid my mom would always use patronizing tones with me when I had said something absurdly stupid...
Simple. By educating our friends and neighbors in a non-combative and respectful way. The opposite of your puerile method of persuasion.oh yeah, and who is it you were planning on presenting the facts to exactly? And who is going to be presenting the facts? And when will they have time for that? And how will they support themselves while they dedicate themselves to do the arduous task? And how is this entities propaganda going to compete with the might and media in the corner of the GOV? Especially when we Allow people to go to jail and prison for mere possession every day... the same people that would be well informed voters.... that lose their jobs and families and friends and houses and whole lives to the stupid legislature that is enforced....
Ludicrous... lol... your method changed more minds... lol... the sixties used methods such as mine, and is also the most famous decade for Open Cannabis use, and has influenced every generation to come to have softer feelings for it, and associate it with peace. I am not trying to organize anarchy whatsoever. I am trying to get people together to organize a well planned out form of public education and protest that will demand the immediate legalization in 2010! I will repeat that 2010! So where the hell did you get that overnight crap? I would appreciate it if you would stop trying to put down things like they came from me, when they came from you (anarchy, overnight, etc. etc.) Apparently, enough people do care about relegalization... or things wouldn't be happening as they are in almost 30 States! People are already sick and tired of being persecuted, and as they saw Prop 215 work in California, they discovered the medicinal use was the easiest fastest foot in the door to legal protection from prosecution, and decided to go that route... only now a decade later, California's medical marijuana laws are a mess of confusion, sucking up tax payers dollars, being trumped in some federal courts, causing problems between states and the White House, causing more and more of a negative image for Cannabis users... I would say that for as much good as Prop 215 does, there certainly a lot of complex problems that have arisen from it, and Proposition 215 did come about through methods you suggested, but not without the bulk of my ideas coming into play as well... What I am suggesting includes your methods as well... it just also goes a lot farther than that...It won't work because it is a ludicrous concept. My method has already changed more minds than yours ever will. Organized anarchy is a contradiction in terms.
Political change, even revolution, takes time. Political movements do not spring up overnight. They originate organically over time as a result of one person explaining to another person why change makes sense, and why it is so vital to change.
And people don't care enough about cannabis re-legalization to revolt over it.
I will not repeat myself for your benefit. You are such an expert in reading comprehension skill as to cast aspersions on mine. Re-read my responses.so posting:
That it is obvious that if you had read something thoroughly and in its entirety, than you would have understood it well, and would not have replied to it claiming that it was supposed to be taken to mean something completely different then what was plainly written.
Is absurdly stupid? Please do explain that one?
I'll quote you.Ludicrous... lol... your method changed more minds... lol... the sixties used methods such as mine, and is also the most famous decade for Open Cannabis use, and has influenced every generation to come to have softer feelings for it, and associate it with peace. I am not trying to organize anarchy whatsoever.
And Trying to get people to Organize this is definitely Anarchy...
It is September 2008. Your proposal is for 2010. Barely a year away. In public policy terms, that is overnight, Junior.I am trying to get people together to organize a well planned out form of public education and protest that will demand the immediate legalization in 2010! I will repeat that 2010! So where the hell did you get that overnight crap?
They did come from you.I would appreciate it if you would stop trying to put down things like they came from me, when they came from you (anarchy, overnight, etc. etc.)
The sixties happened. It's true, but it's equally true the 70's followed close behind. The War on Drugs was a product of the Nixon Administration. Then the 80's and "Just Say 'No'." The situation worsened after the popular uprising of the sixties because normal folks just saw a bunch of smelly hippies smoking grass.Apparently, enough people do care about relegalization... or things wouldn't be happening as they are in almost 30 States! People are already sick and tired of being persecuted, and as they saw Prop 215 work in California, they discovered the medicinal use was the easiest fastest foot in the door to legal protection from prosecution, and decided to go that route... only now a decade later, California's medical marijuana laws are a mess of confusion, sucking up tax payers dollars, being trumped in some federal courts, causing problems between states and the White House, causing more and more of a negative image for Cannabis users... I would say that for as much good as Prop 215 does, there certainly a lot of complex problems that have arisen from it, and Proposition 215 did come about through methods you suggested, but not without the bulk of my ideas coming into play as well... What I am suggesting includes your methods as well... it just also goes a lot farther than that...
I think the majority of those Americans that wouldn't run that risk are just like you in what you said about hopping on the train as it goes by and showing support when you see it actually happening, because risking it all alone is a very scary thought... otherwise I would be trying to do all those things on my own and would fail horribly at it...i think when it comes right down to it there arent enough Americans in the US that are willing to put there lives as well as the lives of there family, credit, house, cars, etc. on the line for the sake of making marijuana legal.
dont get me wrong if i saw a charter in my town that was calling the masses to meet and march towards something great i would be all for it. if i saw something that said "come together and meet in the largest city in your area and bring fellow advocates", i would be all for it.
dont forget that after the 60s penalties for narcotics was well as marijuana continued to get worse and worse. we have come all this way and now in a dozen or so states medical marijuana is legal or tolerated(depending on how you look at it) to the point that dispensaries are open. do you really want to possibly put those in jeopardy?
i just wanna say that im all for what your doing and i support it but im not the kind of man to walk alone.
what you are suggesting we do would, imo, only be possible in an Obama headed presidency. so if you are really into doing this vote hope for him